Lower 3- and 6-month postoperative patient-reported outcome measures are associated with treatment failure 2 years following osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee
Kylee Rucinski, James P. Stannard, Clayton W. Nuelle, Cory R. Crecelius, Renee Stucky, James L. Cook
{"title":"Lower 3- and 6-month postoperative patient-reported outcome measures are associated with treatment failure 2 years following osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee","authors":"Kylee Rucinski, James P. Stannard, Clayton W. Nuelle, Cory R. Crecelius, Renee Stucky, James L. Cook","doi":"10.1002/ksa.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The reliability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as a predictive tool for delayed recovery at 2 years and long-term outcomes following osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCAT) remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to evaluate baseline and 3- to 6-month PROMs for association with 2-year treatment outcomes in primary OCAT patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients were prospectively enrolled in a dedicated OCAT registry at a single institution. Preoperative, 3-, 6-month and annual PROMs for function, pain and global health were analysed for associations with recovery and treatment failure, defined as conversion to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or revision surgery within 2 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Two hundred and seventeen primary OCAT patients were included for analyses; 34 patients experienced treatment failure with 8 undergoing revision and 26 undergoing TKA at a mean timepoint of 15.5 months. Changes in PROMIS Physical Health, PROMIS Physical Function and PROMIS Pain Interference scores from preoperative status were significantly different between 2-year success versus failure cohorts. Absence of mental health history (odds ratio [OR] 2.9, <i>p</i> = 0.033) and lower preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores (<i>p</i> = 0.001) were associated with meeting visual analog scale and IKDC minimal clinically important differences at 1 year. Male sex (<i>p</i> = 0.055), nonadherence (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001, OR: 4.03) and surgery type (tibiofemoral bipolar) (<0.001, OR: 11.3) were significantly associated with increased risk for treatment failure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Preoperative and 3–6 months PROMs may be useful for identifying patients at-risk for delayed recovery or early failure 2 years following OCAT in the knee in combination with other known risk factors. These findings have significant implications for shared decision-making regarding OCAT indications, timing, patient education and expectations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level III, cross-sectional analysis of prospectively collected registry data.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17880,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","volume":"34 10","pages":"3502-3510"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ksa.70105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The reliability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as a predictive tool for delayed recovery at 2 years and long-term outcomes following osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCAT) remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to evaluate baseline and 3- to 6-month PROMs for association with 2-year treatment outcomes in primary OCAT patients.
Methods
Patients were prospectively enrolled in a dedicated OCAT registry at a single institution. Preoperative, 3-, 6-month and annual PROMs for function, pain and global health were analysed for associations with recovery and treatment failure, defined as conversion to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or revision surgery within 2 years.
Results
Two hundred and seventeen primary OCAT patients were included for analyses; 34 patients experienced treatment failure with 8 undergoing revision and 26 undergoing TKA at a mean timepoint of 15.5 months. Changes in PROMIS Physical Health, PROMIS Physical Function and PROMIS Pain Interference scores from preoperative status were significantly different between 2-year success versus failure cohorts. Absence of mental health history (odds ratio [OR] 2.9, p = 0.033) and lower preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores (p = 0.001) were associated with meeting visual analog scale and IKDC minimal clinically important differences at 1 year. Male sex (p = 0.055), nonadherence (p ≤ 0.001, OR: 4.03) and surgery type (tibiofemoral bipolar) (<0.001, OR: 11.3) were significantly associated with increased risk for treatment failure.
Conclusion
Preoperative and 3–6 months PROMs may be useful for identifying patients at-risk for delayed recovery or early failure 2 years following OCAT in the knee in combination with other known risk factors. These findings have significant implications for shared decision-making regarding OCAT indications, timing, patient education and expectations.
Level of Evidence
Level III, cross-sectional analysis of prospectively collected registry data.
期刊介绍:
Few other areas of orthopedic surgery and traumatology have undergone such a dramatic evolution in the last 10 years as knee surgery, arthroscopy and sports traumatology. Ranked among the top 33% of journals in both Orthopedics and Sports Sciences, the goal of this European journal is to publish papers about innovative knee surgery, sports trauma surgery and arthroscopy. Each issue features a series of peer-reviewed articles that deal with diagnosis and management and with basic research. Each issue also contains at least one review article about an important clinical problem. Case presentations or short notes about technical innovations are also accepted for publication.
The articles cover all aspects of knee surgery and all types of sports trauma; in addition, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, and all types of arthroscopy (not only the knee but also the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, ankle, etc.) are addressed. Articles on new diagnostic techniques such as MRI and ultrasound and high-quality articles about the biomechanics of joints, muscles and tendons are included. Although this is largely a clinical journal, it is also open to basic research with clinical relevance.
Because the journal is supported by a distinguished European Editorial Board, assisted by an international Advisory Board, you can be assured that the journal maintains the highest standards.
Official Clinical Journal of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA).