Explaining Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Telehealth Use with Different Levels of English Proficiency: A Decomposition Approach.

IF 1.9 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2025-09-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26924366251379188
Nari Yoo, Yumin Hong, Yoonyoung Choi
{"title":"Explaining Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Telehealth Use with Different Levels of English Proficiency: A Decomposition Approach.","authors":"Nari Yoo, Yumin Hong, Yoonyoung Choi","doi":"10.1177/26924366251379188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examined disparities in telehealth utilization across various health care services among adults in California, with particular focus on racial, ethnic, and linguistic differences. While telehealth has emerged as a potential tool for addressing health care disparities, evidence suggests that utilization patterns may exacerbate existing inequities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the 2021-2022 California Health Interview Survey (n = 45,893) conducted in diverse languages, we employed descriptive statistics and nonlinear Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition to analyze disparities in telehealth utilization. The Blinder-Oaxaca method systematically partitions outcome differences between groups into explained components and unexplained components. We stratified analyses by visit purpose: mental health, primary care, acute care, chronic care, orthopedics, dermatology, and ophthalmology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with non-Hispanic Whites, African Americans used telehealth 4.1% more (<i>p</i> < 0.01), whereas Hispanics/Latinos and Asians used it 5.9% (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and 11.3% (<i>p</i> < 0.01) less, respectively. For Hispanics/Latinos, approximately 14% of the disparity remained unexplained by measured covariates, while for Asians, 92% was unexplained (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP) were 9.6% (<i>p</i> < 0.01) less likely to use telehealth overall, with 38% of this gap unexplained by measured factors (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The disparity was most pronounced in mental health services, where LEP individuals utilized telehealth 4.9% points less than non-LEP individuals (<i>p</i> < 0.01), with this gap entirely unexplained by sociodemographic factors. Subgroup analysis revealed telehealth utilization disparities between LEP and non-LEP individuals across all language groups, with LEP Spanish speakers using telehealth 4.3% points less than non-LEP Spanish speakers (<i>p</i> < 0.01), LEP Asian language speakers using it 7.3% points less than non-LEP Asian language speakers (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and LEP speakers of other languages using it 7.3% points less than their non-LEP counterparts (<i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings reveal significant disparities in telehealth utilization associated with race/ethnicity and English proficiency levels, with linguistic barriers most evident in mental health services. The substantial unexplained components in our decomposition analyses suggest that cultural, structural, and linguistic factors beyond socioeconomic factors significantly influence telehealth utilization. These results underscore the need for efforts to develop linguistically appropriate telehealth services, particularly in mental health care. Addressing these barriers is crucial for harnessing telehealth's potential to promote health equity rather than exacerbating existing health disparities in an increasingly digital health care environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94218,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"268-278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12549173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26924366251379188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study examined disparities in telehealth utilization across various health care services among adults in California, with particular focus on racial, ethnic, and linguistic differences. While telehealth has emerged as a potential tool for addressing health care disparities, evidence suggests that utilization patterns may exacerbate existing inequities.

Methods: Using the 2021-2022 California Health Interview Survey (n = 45,893) conducted in diverse languages, we employed descriptive statistics and nonlinear Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition to analyze disparities in telehealth utilization. The Blinder-Oaxaca method systematically partitions outcome differences between groups into explained components and unexplained components. We stratified analyses by visit purpose: mental health, primary care, acute care, chronic care, orthopedics, dermatology, and ophthalmology.

Results: Compared with non-Hispanic Whites, African Americans used telehealth 4.1% more (p < 0.01), whereas Hispanics/Latinos and Asians used it 5.9% (p < 0.01) and 11.3% (p < 0.01) less, respectively. For Hispanics/Latinos, approximately 14% of the disparity remained unexplained by measured covariates, while for Asians, 92% was unexplained (p < 0.01). Individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP) were 9.6% (p < 0.01) less likely to use telehealth overall, with 38% of this gap unexplained by measured factors (p < 0.01). The disparity was most pronounced in mental health services, where LEP individuals utilized telehealth 4.9% points less than non-LEP individuals (p < 0.01), with this gap entirely unexplained by sociodemographic factors. Subgroup analysis revealed telehealth utilization disparities between LEP and non-LEP individuals across all language groups, with LEP Spanish speakers using telehealth 4.3% points less than non-LEP Spanish speakers (p < 0.01), LEP Asian language speakers using it 7.3% points less than non-LEP Asian language speakers (p < 0.01), and LEP speakers of other languages using it 7.3% points less than their non-LEP counterparts (p < 0.01).

Discussion: Our findings reveal significant disparities in telehealth utilization associated with race/ethnicity and English proficiency levels, with linguistic barriers most evident in mental health services. The substantial unexplained components in our decomposition analyses suggest that cultural, structural, and linguistic factors beyond socioeconomic factors significantly influence telehealth utilization. These results underscore the need for efforts to develop linguistically appropriate telehealth services, particularly in mental health care. Addressing these barriers is crucial for harnessing telehealth's potential to promote health equity rather than exacerbating existing health disparities in an increasingly digital health care environment.

解释不同英语水平的远程医疗使用中的种族/民族差异:一种分解方法。
背景:本研究调查了加州成年人在各种医疗保健服务中远程医疗利用的差异,特别关注种族、民族和语言差异。虽然远程保健已成为解决保健差距的潜在工具,但有证据表明,远程保健的使用模式可能加剧现有的不平等现象。方法:采用不同语言的《2021-2022年加州健康访谈调查》(n = 45,893),采用描述性统计和非线性Blinder-Oaxaca分解分析远程医疗利用的差异。Blinder-Oaxaca方法系统地将各组之间的结果差异划分为可解释成分和未解释成分。我们按访视目的进行分层分析:心理健康、初级保健、急症护理、慢性护理、骨科、皮肤科和眼科。结果:与非西班牙裔白人相比,非洲裔美国人远程医疗使用率高4.1% (p < 0.01),西班牙裔/拉丁裔和亚洲人分别低5.9% (p < 0.01)和11.3% (p < 0.01)。对于西班牙裔/拉丁裔,大约14%的差异仍然无法解释测量的协变量,而对于亚洲人,92%无法解释(p < 0.01)。总体而言,英语水平有限(LEP)的个体使用远程医疗的可能性降低了9.6% (p < 0.01),其中38%的差异无法用测量因素解释(p < 0.01)。这种差异在心理健康服务中最为明显,LEP个体的远程医疗使用率比非LEP个体低4.9% (p < 0.01),这一差距完全无法由社会人口因素解释。亚组分析揭示了LEP和非LEP个体在所有语言群体中的远程医疗利用差异,LEP西班牙语使用者比非LEP西班牙语使用者少4.3% (p < 0.01), LEP亚洲语言使用者比非LEP亚洲语言使用者少7.3% (p < 0.01), LEP其他语言使用者比非LEP人群少7.3% (p < 0.01)。讨论:我们的研究结果揭示了与种族/民族和英语熟练程度相关的远程医疗利用的显著差异,语言障碍在精神卫生服务中最为明显。在我们的分解分析中,大量无法解释的成分表明,除社会经济因素外,文化、结构和语言因素显著影响远程医疗的利用。这些结果强调需要努力发展语言上适当的远程保健服务,特别是在精神保健方面。在日益数字化的卫生保健环境中,消除这些障碍对于利用远程保健的潜力促进卫生公平而不是加剧现有的卫生差距至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书