Parental Feeding Strategies and Outcomes During Complementary Food Introduction Among Preterm Infants at 12 Months Corrected Age.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Kelsey L Thompson, Jinhee Park, Cara McComish, Suzanne Thoyre, Karen Erickson
{"title":"Parental Feeding Strategies and Outcomes During Complementary Food Introduction Among Preterm Infants at 12 Months Corrected Age.","authors":"Kelsey L Thompson, Jinhee Park, Cara McComish, Suzanne Thoyre, Karen Erickson","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The introduction to complementary food is an important stage, particularly for preterm infants and their parents as they navigate a changing feeding relationship. Parental feeding strategies during this period can influence long-term feeding outcomes, but the influence of specific strategies on later feeding skills and feeding problem symptoms is unknown.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Parents of preterm infants completed surveys about their infant's feeding at regular intervals from 1 to 12 months of age. At each time point, parents reported on their use of feeding strategies and their infants' feeding skills (Child Oral and Motor Proficiency Scale) and feeding problem symptoms (Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool). Patterns of parental strategy use across the early complementary feeding period were examined and associations with feeding skills and problems at 12 months corrected age was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four parents completed the surveys. Frequency and type of strategies used changed over time. Four patterns of parental strategy use emerged: low-moderate, schedule dominant, dual dominant, and modification dominant. Parental use of 2 or more types of strategies at relatively high levels was associated with more feeding problem symptoms at 12 months but not feeding skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parents of preterm infants use different strategies during the complementary feeding period to navigate their infant's feeding, with potential implications for later feeding problems. Future research should explore causal mechanism behind parental strategy use and feeding problem symptoms through longitudinal analyses and investigate how parental perceptions and decision-making regarding mealtime strategy use evolve over the first year of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e247-e253"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The introduction to complementary food is an important stage, particularly for preterm infants and their parents as they navigate a changing feeding relationship. Parental feeding strategies during this period can influence long-term feeding outcomes, but the influence of specific strategies on later feeding skills and feeding problem symptoms is unknown.

Method: Parents of preterm infants completed surveys about their infant's feeding at regular intervals from 1 to 12 months of age. At each time point, parents reported on their use of feeding strategies and their infants' feeding skills (Child Oral and Motor Proficiency Scale) and feeding problem symptoms (Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool). Patterns of parental strategy use across the early complementary feeding period were examined and associations with feeding skills and problems at 12 months corrected age was assessed.

Results: Seventy-four parents completed the surveys. Frequency and type of strategies used changed over time. Four patterns of parental strategy use emerged: low-moderate, schedule dominant, dual dominant, and modification dominant. Parental use of 2 or more types of strategies at relatively high levels was associated with more feeding problem symptoms at 12 months but not feeding skills.

Conclusion: Parents of preterm infants use different strategies during the complementary feeding period to navigate their infant's feeding, with potential implications for later feeding problems. Future research should explore causal mechanism behind parental strategy use and feeding problem symptoms through longitudinal analyses and investigate how parental perceptions and decision-making regarding mealtime strategy use evolve over the first year of life.

在12个月矫正年龄的早产儿中引入辅食的父母喂养策略和结果。
目的:辅食的介绍是一个重要的阶段,特别是早产儿和他们的父母,因为他们导航不断变化的喂养关系。在此期间,父母的喂养策略可以影响长期的喂养结果,但具体策略对后来的喂养技巧和喂养问题症状的影响尚不清楚。方法:对1 ~ 12个月大的早产儿父母进行定期喂养调查。在每个时间点,父母报告了他们对喂养策略的使用和婴儿的喂养技巧(儿童口腔和运动熟练程度量表)和喂养问题症状(儿科饮食评估工具)。研究人员检查了早期补充喂养期间父母策略使用的模式,并评估了12个月矫正年龄时喂养技巧和问题的关系。结果:74名家长完成问卷调查。使用策略的频率和类型随着时间的推移而变化。出现了四种父母策略使用模式:低-中度、计划显性、双重显性和修改显性。父母使用两种或两种以上相对较高水平的策略与12个月时更多的喂养问题症状相关但与喂养技能无关。结论:早产儿的父母在辅食期采用不同的喂养策略来引导婴儿的喂养,这可能对以后的喂养问题产生影响。未来的研究应该通过纵向分析来探索父母策略使用和喂养问题症状背后的因果机制,并调查父母对用餐时间策略使用的看法和决策在出生后的第一年是如何演变的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书