New Onset of Suicidal Ideation in Children With Neurologic, Developmental, and Behavioral Disorders From Longitudinal Universal Suicide Risk Screening.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Allison E Gornik, Benjamin J Schindel, Amanda Kim, Mwuese Ngur, T Andrew Zabel, Carmen Lopez-Arvizu, Suzanne Rybczynski, Paul H Lipkin
{"title":"New Onset of Suicidal Ideation in Children With Neurologic, Developmental, and Behavioral Disorders From Longitudinal Universal Suicide Risk Screening.","authors":"Allison E Gornik, Benjamin J Schindel, Amanda Kim, Mwuese Ngur, T Andrew Zabel, Carmen Lopez-Arvizu, Suzanne Rybczynski, Paul H Lipkin","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This naturalistic, observational study aimed to assess the frequency and timing of new and recent suicidal ideation (SI) in youth with neurologic, developmental, and behavioral disorders (NDBDs) after an initial negative suicide risk screening within medical and behavioral health settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 5030 children aged 8 to 17 years were included, all of whom received at least 2 routine suicide risk screenings between July 2019 and February 2024 as part of their larger clinical care appointments (N = 20,177 total screenings). Screenings were conducted using the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions tool. Analyses examined the interval between an initial negative screening and the emergence of new SI, with stratification by clinic type and age group. Predictors of new onset of SI were also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, a significant proportion of children screened positive for new SI after an initial negative screening (8.4%). Rates were higher in behavioral health clinics (11.3%) compared with medical clinics (5.4%), with a median interval of 5 to 6 months to the first positive screening for both settings. Females were more likely to report new SI, as were those in seen in behavioral health as compared with medical clinics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the importance of repeated suicide risk screening in children with NDBDs as a significant proportion of new SI is reported in the months after an initial negative screening. Screening only annually appears likely to underdetect risk, underscoring the need for more frequent screening particularly within the first year of care to improve early detection and intervention opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e19-e25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13674346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This naturalistic, observational study aimed to assess the frequency and timing of new and recent suicidal ideation (SI) in youth with neurologic, developmental, and behavioral disorders (NDBDs) after an initial negative suicide risk screening within medical and behavioral health settings.

Method: A total of 5030 children aged 8 to 17 years were included, all of whom received at least 2 routine suicide risk screenings between July 2019 and February 2024 as part of their larger clinical care appointments (N = 20,177 total screenings). Screenings were conducted using the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions tool. Analyses examined the interval between an initial negative screening and the emergence of new SI, with stratification by clinic type and age group. Predictors of new onset of SI were also examined.

Results: Overall, a significant proportion of children screened positive for new SI after an initial negative screening (8.4%). Rates were higher in behavioral health clinics (11.3%) compared with medical clinics (5.4%), with a median interval of 5 to 6 months to the first positive screening for both settings. Females were more likely to report new SI, as were those in seen in behavioral health as compared with medical clinics.

Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of repeated suicide risk screening in children with NDBDs as a significant proportion of new SI is reported in the months after an initial negative screening. Screening only annually appears likely to underdetect risk, underscoring the need for more frequent screening particularly within the first year of care to improve early detection and intervention opportunities.

来自纵向普遍自杀风险筛查的神经、发育和行为障碍儿童的新发自杀意念。
目的:这项自然的观察性研究旨在评估在医学和行为健康环境中进行初步阴性自杀风险筛查后,神经、发育和行为障碍(NDBDs)青少年新的和最近的自杀意念(SI)的频率和时间。方法:共纳入5030名8至17岁儿童,所有儿童在2019年7月至2024年2月期间接受了至少2次常规自杀风险筛查,作为其大型临床护理预约的一部分(N = 20177次筛查)。使用“询问自杀筛查问题”工具进行筛查。分析了最初阴性筛查和新SI出现之间的间隔,并按临床类型和年龄组分层。对SI新发的预测因素也进行了研究。结果:总体而言,在最初的阴性筛查后,新SI筛查阳性的儿童比例显著(8.4%)。行为健康诊所的检出率(11.3%)高于医学诊所(5.4%),两种机构首次筛查阳性的中位数间隔为5至6个月。与医学诊所相比,女性更有可能报告新的SI,行为健康方面的情况也是如此。结论:研究结果强调了在ndbd儿童中反复进行自杀风险筛查的重要性,因为在最初的阴性筛查后的几个月内报告了很大比例的新SI。仅每年进行筛查似乎可能未充分发现风险,强调需要更频繁地进行筛查,特别是在治疗的第一年,以改善早期发现和干预机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书