Whose Autonomy Matters? Using Relational Autonomy to Analyze Caregiver Roles in Decision-Making for Cancer Clinical Trials.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-28 DOI:10.1080/23294515.2025.2576829
Eric C Blackstone, Susan R Mazanec, Barbara J Daly, Jennifer A Dorth, Alberto J Montero, Mark P Aulisio, Patricia T Brandt, Sana Loue
{"title":"Whose Autonomy Matters? Using Relational Autonomy to Analyze Caregiver Roles in Decision-Making for Cancer Clinical Trials.","authors":"Eric C Blackstone, Susan R Mazanec, Barbara J Daly, Jennifer A Dorth, Alberto J Montero, Mark P Aulisio, Patricia T Brandt, Sana Loue","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2025.2576829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Participation in a therapeutic clinical trial can be a challenging decision for patients with cancer and their family caregivers. Despite the implications of clinical trials for caregivers, there is little empirical research about how caregivers participate in clinical trial decision-making. This qualitative study sought to identify how caregivers view their role in these decisions and the attitudes and experiences of clinical trial staff regarding inclusion of caregivers in the informed consent process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed four focus groups-two with clinical trial staff and two with caregivers of patients offered a cancer clinical trial-followed by 15 semi-structured interviews with caregivers. Focus group results informed interview guide development. Transcripts were analyzed using an abductive approach to content analysis, incorporating the theory of relational autonomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers viewed their role as enhancing patient autonomy by helping to interpret clinical trial information and acting as a sounding board. They expressed ambivalence regarding the appropriate degree of influence caregivers should have in the final decision and were cautious not to overly sway patients. Clinical trial staff viewed caregivers as highly influential in decision-making and vital to supporting patient adherence to the study protocol. Caregiver relationships with the oncologist and research staff were influential in their perception of the benefits of the clinical trial and comfort with their loved one participating.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregivers' key role in facilitating clinical trial decision-making and protocol adherence merits further attention from bioethicists and researchers. Uncertainty regarding their appropriate decisional role highlights the need for assessment of shared decision-making (SDM) preferences to include caregivers in addition to the traditional patient-physician dyad. Future research should develop and test SDM tools incorporating relational autonomy to identify appropriate decisional roles based on patient-caregiver relationship dynamics and values.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"267-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12721408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2025.2576829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Participation in a therapeutic clinical trial can be a challenging decision for patients with cancer and their family caregivers. Despite the implications of clinical trials for caregivers, there is little empirical research about how caregivers participate in clinical trial decision-making. This qualitative study sought to identify how caregivers view their role in these decisions and the attitudes and experiences of clinical trial staff regarding inclusion of caregivers in the informed consent process.

Methods: We performed four focus groups-two with clinical trial staff and two with caregivers of patients offered a cancer clinical trial-followed by 15 semi-structured interviews with caregivers. Focus group results informed interview guide development. Transcripts were analyzed using an abductive approach to content analysis, incorporating the theory of relational autonomy.

Results: Caregivers viewed their role as enhancing patient autonomy by helping to interpret clinical trial information and acting as a sounding board. They expressed ambivalence regarding the appropriate degree of influence caregivers should have in the final decision and were cautious not to overly sway patients. Clinical trial staff viewed caregivers as highly influential in decision-making and vital to supporting patient adherence to the study protocol. Caregiver relationships with the oncologist and research staff were influential in their perception of the benefits of the clinical trial and comfort with their loved one participating.

Conclusions: Caregivers' key role in facilitating clinical trial decision-making and protocol adherence merits further attention from bioethicists and researchers. Uncertainty regarding their appropriate decisional role highlights the need for assessment of shared decision-making (SDM) preferences to include caregivers in addition to the traditional patient-physician dyad. Future research should develop and test SDM tools incorporating relational autonomy to identify appropriate decisional roles based on patient-caregiver relationship dynamics and values.

谁的自主权重要?利用关系自主分析护理人员在癌症临床试验决策中的作用。
背景:参与治疗性临床试验对癌症患者和他们的家庭照顾者来说是一个具有挑战性的决定。尽管临床试验对护理人员的影响,很少有关于护理人员如何参与临床试验决策的实证研究。本定性研究旨在确定护理人员如何看待他们在这些决定中的作用,以及临床试验人员关于将护理人员纳入知情同意过程的态度和经验。方法:我们进行了四个焦点小组——两个是临床试验人员,两个是提供癌症临床试验的患者的护理人员——随后对护理人员进行了15次半结构化访谈。焦点小组的结果通知了面试指南的发展。使用内容分析的溯因方法分析转录本,结合关系自治理论。结果:护理人员认为他们的角色是通过帮助解释临床试验信息和充当一个声音板来增强患者的自主性。他们对护理人员在最终决定中应有的适当影响程度表示矛盾,并谨慎地不要过度影响患者。临床试验人员认为护理人员在决策方面具有很大的影响力,对支持患者遵守研究方案至关重要。护理人员与肿瘤学家和研究人员的关系影响着他们对临床试验的好处的看法,以及他们所爱的人参与试验的舒适度。结论:护理人员在促进临床试验决策和方案遵守方面的关键作用值得生物伦理学家和研究人员进一步关注。关于他们适当的决策角色的不确定性突出了评估共同决策(SDM)偏好的需要,除了传统的患者-医生二元组之外,还包括护理人员。未来的研究应该开发和测试SDM工具,包括关系自治,以确定基于患者-护理者关系动态和价值观的适当决策角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书