Analysis of Lumbar Joint Movement and Dynamics of Weightlifters.

IF 0.6 4区 计算机科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-10-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/abb/3678401
Li Xiao
{"title":"Analysis of Lumbar Joint Movement and Dynamics of Weightlifters.","authors":"Li Xiao","doi":"10.1155/abb/3678401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the effects of different hard pull actions on lumbar joint movement and dynamics in weightlifting and evaluate their contribution to the risk of lumbar spine injury.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study recruited eight national second level and above weightlifters as volunteers, and conducted detailed kinematic and dynamic analysis of different hard pull actions through exercise experiments and finite element analysis (FEA).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The lumbar flexion angles of traditional hard pull and hexagonal barbell hard pull were 58° and 55°, respectively, while the lumbar flexion angle of straight leg hard pull was 90°. The first peak torque of straight leg hard pull was 893 N∙m, significantly higher than the traditional hard pull of 749 N∙m and the hexagonal barbell hard pull of 640 N∙m. In terms of stress distribution, the peak stress of straight leg hard pull at the L5 vertebral body was 997 MPa, and the peak stress of L5 trabecular bone was 3.3 MPa, both higher than traditional hard pull and hexagonal barbell hard pull. The peak stress of the lumbar intervertebral disc was also highest in straight leg tension, with the peak stress of the L4-5 lumbar intervertebral disc being 45.6 MPa.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Straight leg hard pull causes greater damage to the lumbar spine due to its larger lumbar flexion angle and higher peak stress. The damage to the L5 vertebral body during weightlifting is much higher than that of other lumbar vertebrae. Therefore, it is recommended to reduce straight leg hard pull during weightlifting training and strengthen protective measures for the L5 vertebral body to reduce lumbar spine injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":8029,"journal":{"name":"Applied Bionics and Biomechanics","volume":"2025 ","pages":"3678401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12548840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Bionics and Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/abb/3678401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the effects of different hard pull actions on lumbar joint movement and dynamics in weightlifting and evaluate their contribution to the risk of lumbar spine injury.

Method: The study recruited eight national second level and above weightlifters as volunteers, and conducted detailed kinematic and dynamic analysis of different hard pull actions through exercise experiments and finite element analysis (FEA).

Result: The lumbar flexion angles of traditional hard pull and hexagonal barbell hard pull were 58° and 55°, respectively, while the lumbar flexion angle of straight leg hard pull was 90°. The first peak torque of straight leg hard pull was 893 N∙m, significantly higher than the traditional hard pull of 749 N∙m and the hexagonal barbell hard pull of 640 N∙m. In terms of stress distribution, the peak stress of straight leg hard pull at the L5 vertebral body was 997 MPa, and the peak stress of L5 trabecular bone was 3.3 MPa, both higher than traditional hard pull and hexagonal barbell hard pull. The peak stress of the lumbar intervertebral disc was also highest in straight leg tension, with the peak stress of the L4-5 lumbar intervertebral disc being 45.6 MPa.

Conclusion: Straight leg hard pull causes greater damage to the lumbar spine due to its larger lumbar flexion angle and higher peak stress. The damage to the L5 vertebral body during weightlifting is much higher than that of other lumbar vertebrae. Therefore, it is recommended to reduce straight leg hard pull during weightlifting training and strengthen protective measures for the L5 vertebral body to reduce lumbar spine injury.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

举重运动员腰椎关节运动与动力学分析。
目的:分析举重运动中不同硬拉动作对腰椎关节运动和动力学的影响,并评价其对腰椎损伤风险的影响。方法:招募8名国家二级及以上举重运动员作为志愿者,通过运动实验和有限元分析,对不同的硬拉动作进行详细的运动学和动力学分析。结果:传统硬拉和六角形杠铃硬拉腰椎屈曲角度分别为58°和55°,直腿硬拉腰椎屈曲角度为90°。直腿硬拔的第一个峰值扭矩为893 N∙m,显著高于传统硬拔的749 N∙m和六角形杠铃硬拔的640 N∙m。在应力分布上,L5椎体直腿硬拉的峰值应力为997 MPa, L5小梁骨的峰值应力为3.3 MPa,均高于传统硬拉和六角形杠铃硬拉。直腿张力时腰椎间盘的峰值应力也最高,L4-5腰椎间盘的峰值应力为45.6 MPa。结论:直腿硬拉腰椎屈曲角度较大,峰值应力较高,对腰椎损伤较大。举重对L5椎体的损伤远高于其他腰椎。因此,建议在举重训练中减少直腿硬拉,加强对L5椎体的保护措施,以减少腰椎损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-ROBOTICS
自引率
4.50%
发文量
338
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Bionics and Biomechanics publishes papers that seek to understand the mechanics of biological systems, or that use the functions of living organisms as inspiration for the design new devices. Such systems may be used as artificial replacements, or aids, for their original biological purpose, or be used in a different setting altogether.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书