Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Clinical colorectal cancer Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.clcc.2025.09.003
Wenting Chai , Siyue Fan , Yanni Lin , Nengtong Zheng , Yuanfang Xiong , Yuan Chen , Zhaoxia Zhang , Lijuan Chen
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Wenting Chai ,&nbsp;Siyue Fan ,&nbsp;Yanni Lin ,&nbsp;Nengtong Zheng ,&nbsp;Yuanfang Xiong ,&nbsp;Yuan Chen ,&nbsp;Zhaoxia Zhang ,&nbsp;Lijuan Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Through systematic review and meta-analysis, we explored the performance of machine learning (ML) risk prediction models for early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) to enhance model development and application. Following preregistration of the study protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42024606785), we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, VIP, SinoMed, and the CNKI databases for studies on constructing predictive EOCRC based on ML methods. The prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool + Artificial Intelligence (PROBAST + AI) tool was used to evaluate the quality, bias risk, and applicability of the included studies. The Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis + Artificial Intelligence (TRIPOD + AI) reporting standard was applied to assess the reporting quality of these studies. We conducted subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis. This study followed the PRISMA reporting guidelines. A total of 2809 studies were retrieved, and 7 studies were included. The training set size ranged from 987 to 21,700 patients, with an average of 5037 per model. XGBoost was the most frequently used modelling method. Overall TRIPOD + AI compliance was 70.5%. In model development, 5 studies were rated as high-quality concerns (2 unclear), and 5 studies were rated as high adaptability concerns (2 unclear). In model evaluation, 6 studies were rated as high-risk bias (1 unclear), and 5 studies were of concern for high adaptability (2 unclear). The top 5 most common predictors include age, gender, BMI, diabetes and smoking. Meta-analysis showed a pooled AUC of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90; <em>I</em>² = 99.3%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.59-0.86; <em>I</em>² = 94.8%) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.71-0.94; <em>I</em>² = 95.6%), respectively (both <em>P</em> &lt; .001 for heterogeneity). This study demonstrates that ML models show outstanding discriminatory capabilities in predicting the risk of EOCRC, supporting their potential application in identifying high-risk individuals for targeted prevention and monitoring. In the future, prospective design and standardized reporting are needed to enhance reliability and clinical translation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10373,"journal":{"name":"Clinical colorectal cancer","volume":"24 4","pages":"Pages 432-445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical colorectal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002825000775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Through systematic review and meta-analysis, we explored the performance of machine learning (ML) risk prediction models for early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) to enhance model development and application. Following preregistration of the study protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42024606785), we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, VIP, SinoMed, and the CNKI databases for studies on constructing predictive EOCRC based on ML methods. The prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool + Artificial Intelligence (PROBAST + AI) tool was used to evaluate the quality, bias risk, and applicability of the included studies. The Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis + Artificial Intelligence (TRIPOD + AI) reporting standard was applied to assess the reporting quality of these studies. We conducted subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis. This study followed the PRISMA reporting guidelines. A total of 2809 studies were retrieved, and 7 studies were included. The training set size ranged from 987 to 21,700 patients, with an average of 5037 per model. XGBoost was the most frequently used modelling method. Overall TRIPOD + AI compliance was 70.5%. In model development, 5 studies were rated as high-quality concerns (2 unclear), and 5 studies were rated as high adaptability concerns (2 unclear). In model evaluation, 6 studies were rated as high-risk bias (1 unclear), and 5 studies were of concern for high adaptability (2 unclear). The top 5 most common predictors include age, gender, BMI, diabetes and smoking. Meta-analysis showed a pooled AUC of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90; I² = 99.3%, P < .001). Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.59-0.86; I² = 94.8%) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.71-0.94; I² = 95.6%), respectively (both P < .001 for heterogeneity). This study demonstrates that ML models show outstanding discriminatory capabilities in predicting the risk of EOCRC, supporting their potential application in identifying high-risk individuals for targeted prevention and monitoring. In the future, prospective design and standardized reporting are needed to enhance reliability and clinical translation.
基于机器学习的早发性结直肠癌风险预测模型:系统综述和荟萃分析。
通过系统综述和荟萃分析,探讨机器学习(ML)早发性结直肠癌(EOCRC)风险预测模型的性能,以促进模型的开发和应用。在PROSPERO预注册研究方案(CRD42024606785)后,我们检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、万方数据、VIP、中国医学信息网(SinoMed)和CNKI数据库,查找基于ML方法构建预测EOCRC的研究。采用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具+人工智能(PROBAST + AI)工具评估纳入研究的质量、偏倚风险和适用性。采用个体预后或诊断多变量预测模型透明报告+人工智能(TRIPOD + AI)报告标准评估这些研究的报告质量。进行亚组分析和敏感性分析。本研究遵循PRISMA报告指南。共检索2809项研究,纳入7项研究。训练集的大小从987到21,700个患者,平均每个模型为5037个。XGBoost是最常用的建模方法。总体TRIPOD + AI依从性为70.5%。在模型开发中,5项研究被评为高质量关注(2项不清楚),5项研究被评为高适应性关注(2项不清楚)。在模型评价中,6项研究被评为高危偏倚(1项不清楚),5项研究被评为高适应性关注(2项不清楚)。最常见的5个预测因素包括年龄、性别、身体质量指数、糖尿病和吸烟。meta分析显示合并AUC为0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90; I²= 99.3%,P < .001)。合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.75 (95% CI, 0.59-0.86; I²= 94.8%)和0.87 (95% CI, 0.71-0.94; I²= 95.6%)(异质性均P < 0.001)。该研究表明,ML模型在预测EOCRC风险方面表现出出色的区分能力,支持其在识别高风险个体以进行针对性预防和监测方面的潜在应用。在未来,需要前瞻性设计和标准化报告,以提高可靠性和临床翻译。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical colorectal cancer
Clinical colorectal cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
64
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Colorectal Cancer is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of gastrointestinal cancers. Clinical Colorectal Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of colorectal, pancreatic, liver, and other gastrointestinal cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to gastrointestinal cancers. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书