Forensic Examiner Technology to Enhance Documentation and Data Collection Standardization: A Narrative Review.

IF 0.9
Journal of forensic nursing Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-24 DOI:10.1097/JFN.0000000000000563
Gabrielle O'Keefe, Paige Presler-Jur, Jaclyn Kolnik, Kelsea Albertson, Sarah Philbrick, Peyton Attaway Scalise
{"title":"Forensic Examiner Technology to Enhance Documentation and Data Collection Standardization: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Gabrielle O'Keefe, Paige Presler-Jur, Jaclyn Kolnik, Kelsea Albertson, Sarah Philbrick, Peyton Attaway Scalise","doi":"10.1097/JFN.0000000000000563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interpersonal violence results in adverse individual, interpersonal, community, and societal impacts, including medical and legal burdens. In many cases, interpersonal violence is reported for the first and often only time in a hospital-based setting where injuries are documented by a forensic examiner.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe ways in which technology can enhance the documentation of forensic and medical evidentiary exams and improve information-sharing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative literature review and qualitative synthesis of 35 articles was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relevant trends in applying digital technologies to improve documentation quality and processes, standardization, and de-siloing systems, and to outline resource limitations were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standardization and improved documentation can improve the quality and consistency of exams and provide other benefits to patients, such as improved holistic care. Resource constraints can act as a barrier to implementing standardized documentation practices, information sharing, and deployment of new technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic nursing","volume":" ","pages":"E111-E118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interpersonal violence results in adverse individual, interpersonal, community, and societal impacts, including medical and legal burdens. In many cases, interpersonal violence is reported for the first and often only time in a hospital-based setting where injuries are documented by a forensic examiner.

Aim: To describe ways in which technology can enhance the documentation of forensic and medical evidentiary exams and improve information-sharing.

Methods: A narrative literature review and qualitative synthesis of 35 articles was conducted.

Results: Relevant trends in applying digital technologies to improve documentation quality and processes, standardization, and de-siloing systems, and to outline resource limitations were identified.

Conclusions: Standardization and improved documentation can improve the quality and consistency of exams and provide other benefits to patients, such as improved holistic care. Resource constraints can act as a barrier to implementing standardized documentation practices, information sharing, and deployment of new technologies.

加强文件和数据收集标准化的法医检验技术:叙述性回顾。
背景:人际暴力会对个人、人际、社区和社会造成不利影响,包括医疗和法律负担。在许多情况下,人际暴力是第一次报告,而且往往是在医院的环境中才第一次报告,受伤情况由法医记录在案。目的:描述技术可以增强法医和医学证据检查的文件记录和改进信息共享的方法。方法:对35篇文献进行叙述性文献综述和定性综合。结果:确定了应用数字技术改善文档质量和流程、标准化和去孤岛化系统以及概述资源限制的相关趋势。结论:标准化和改进的文件可以提高检查的质量和一致性,并为患者提供其他好处,如改善整体护理。资源约束可能成为实现标准化文档实践、信息共享和新技术部署的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书