The Decision Tree approach as a strategy for the global phase out of animal testing for acute and local toxicity for chemicals: recommendations from an expert workshop

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105969
Catherine Willett , Giorgia Pallocca , Annamaria Carusi , Nathalie Alépée , Patience Browne , Marie Darracq-Ghitalla-Ciock , Fabian A. Grimm , Jay Ingram , Laura Holden , Kamel Mansouri , Hans Raabe , Clive Roper , Katherine Santizo , Barbara G. Schmitt , Li Xiang , Thomas A. Ward , Bryan Zhou
{"title":"The Decision Tree approach as a strategy for the global phase out of animal testing for acute and local toxicity for chemicals: recommendations from an expert workshop","authors":"Catherine Willett ,&nbsp;Giorgia Pallocca ,&nbsp;Annamaria Carusi ,&nbsp;Nathalie Alépée ,&nbsp;Patience Browne ,&nbsp;Marie Darracq-Ghitalla-Ciock ,&nbsp;Fabian A. Grimm ,&nbsp;Jay Ingram ,&nbsp;Laura Holden ,&nbsp;Kamel Mansouri ,&nbsp;Hans Raabe ,&nbsp;Clive Roper ,&nbsp;Katherine Santizo ,&nbsp;Barbara G. Schmitt ,&nbsp;Li Xiang ,&nbsp;Thomas A. Ward ,&nbsp;Bryan Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Animal-Free Safety Assessment (AFSA) Collaboration invited a select group of international experts, representing regulatory bodies, industry, method developers, and academia, to a workshop to develop a regulatory strategy implementing non-animal approaches to assess acute toxicity endpoints. The workshop, held in Loch Lomond, Scotland, from 28 April to 1 May, 2025, aimed to develop a decision tree (DT) approach that could support the implementation of non-animal methods and the phased-out use of animal testing for systemic acute and local toxicity.</div><div>This DT approach provides a transparent decision-making workflow that assists users in applying appropriate opportunities for waiving testing, non-animal testing methods (NAMs), and other adaptations consistently across chemical regulations. DTs also serve to increase awareness of the application of non-animal approaches and ensure compliance with the last resort requirement for animal studies. This workshop aimed to review the suitability of the proposed framework, formulate overarching recommendations for its implementation and provide specific feedback and timelines to finalise endpoint-specific DTs for acute oral toxicity, eye irritation and corrosion, skin irritation and corrosion, and skin sensitisation. This report summarises the overarching discussions and findings tackled during the meeting. The individual endpoint-specific DTs will be described in follow-up scientific publications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 105969"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025002016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Animal-Free Safety Assessment (AFSA) Collaboration invited a select group of international experts, representing regulatory bodies, industry, method developers, and academia, to a workshop to develop a regulatory strategy implementing non-animal approaches to assess acute toxicity endpoints. The workshop, held in Loch Lomond, Scotland, from 28 April to 1 May, 2025, aimed to develop a decision tree (DT) approach that could support the implementation of non-animal methods and the phased-out use of animal testing for systemic acute and local toxicity.
This DT approach provides a transparent decision-making workflow that assists users in applying appropriate opportunities for waiving testing, non-animal testing methods (NAMs), and other adaptations consistently across chemical regulations. DTs also serve to increase awareness of the application of non-animal approaches and ensure compliance with the last resort requirement for animal studies. This workshop aimed to review the suitability of the proposed framework, formulate overarching recommendations for its implementation and provide specific feedback and timelines to finalise endpoint-specific DTs for acute oral toxicity, eye irritation and corrosion, skin irritation and corrosion, and skin sensitisation. This report summarises the overarching discussions and findings tackled during the meeting. The individual endpoint-specific DTs will be described in follow-up scientific publications.
决策树方法作为全球逐步淘汰化学品急性毒性和局部毒性动物试验的战略:专家讲习班的建议。
无动物安全评估(AFSA)合作组织邀请了一组精选的国际专家,代表监管机构、工业界、方法开发者和学术界,参加一个研讨会,制定一项实施非动物方法评估急性毒性终点的监管战略。该研讨会于2025年4月28日至5月1日在苏格兰Loch Lomond举行,旨在制定一种决策树(DT)方法,支持实施非动物方法,并逐步淘汰用于全身急性和局部毒性的动物试验。这种DT方法提供了一个透明的决策工作流程,帮助用户应用适当的机会来放弃测试,非动物测试方法(NAMs),以及跨化学品法规一致的其他适应性。DTs还有助于提高对非动物方法应用的认识,并确保遵守动物研究的最后手段要求。本次研讨会旨在审查拟议框架的适用性,为其实施制定总体建议,并提供具体的反馈和时间表,以最终确定急性口服毒性,眼睛刺激和腐蚀,皮肤刺激和腐蚀以及皮肤致敏的终点特异性DTs。本报告总结了会议期间的主要讨论和结果。个别特定终点的DTs将在后续科学出版物中进行描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书