Information meetings stimulate older people to talk about their wishes at the end of life.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
MSc Tessa D Bergman, Dr Annicka G M van der Plas, Dr H Roeline W Pasman, Prof Dr Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
{"title":"Information meetings stimulate older people to talk about their wishes at the end of life.","authors":"MSc Tessa D Bergman, Dr Annicka G M van der Plas, Dr H Roeline W Pasman, Prof Dr Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Information meetings aim to inform older people about end-of-life care, and prepare for advance care planning (ACP). Meetings are organized by general practitioners (GPs) inviting their patients or by other organizations targeting older people in general.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether information meetings stimulate ACP (conversations with relatives, healthcare professionals, and documentation), and whether the type of meeting (GP versus other) and attendees' characteristics were associated with having ACP conversations with the GP in response to the meeting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-post interventional study with questionnaires immediately before (T0) and six months after (T2) the information meeting. 98 information meetings were organized (53 by GPs; 45 by other organizations). Older people attended a meeting and filled out questionnaires at T0 (N=1,917) and T2 (N=1,088). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were done.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T2, 26.4% of attendees had had an ACP conversation with their GP in response to the information meeting. Further, more older people had documented (T0: 39%; T2: 53%) and discussed their wishes with relatives (T0: 61%; T2: 84%) at T2. ACP engagement with GPs did not differ between GP or other meetings. Age (OR 1.05), non-Dutch background (OR 2.41), religiosity (OR 0.68) and previously having discussed end-of-life topics with a physician (OR 2.38) were associated with having ACP conversations with GPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Information meetings about end-of-life care stimulate older people to have ACP conversations with GPs and relatives and document wishes. The type of meeting, by GPs or others, does not affect ACP conversations with their GP.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.10.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Information meetings aim to inform older people about end-of-life care, and prepare for advance care planning (ACP). Meetings are organized by general practitioners (GPs) inviting their patients or by other organizations targeting older people in general.

Objectives: To assess whether information meetings stimulate ACP (conversations with relatives, healthcare professionals, and documentation), and whether the type of meeting (GP versus other) and attendees' characteristics were associated with having ACP conversations with the GP in response to the meeting.

Methods: A pre-post interventional study with questionnaires immediately before (T0) and six months after (T2) the information meeting. 98 information meetings were organized (53 by GPs; 45 by other organizations). Older people attended a meeting and filled out questionnaires at T0 (N=1,917) and T2 (N=1,088). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were done.

Results: At T2, 26.4% of attendees had had an ACP conversation with their GP in response to the information meeting. Further, more older people had documented (T0: 39%; T2: 53%) and discussed their wishes with relatives (T0: 61%; T2: 84%) at T2. ACP engagement with GPs did not differ between GP or other meetings. Age (OR 1.05), non-Dutch background (OR 2.41), religiosity (OR 0.68) and previously having discussed end-of-life topics with a physician (OR 2.38) were associated with having ACP conversations with GPs.

Conclusions: Information meetings about end-of-life care stimulate older people to have ACP conversations with GPs and relatives and document wishes. The type of meeting, by GPs or others, does not affect ACP conversations with their GP.

信息会议鼓励老年人谈论他们在生命结束时的愿望。
背景:信息会议的目的是告知老年人关于临终关怀,并为提前护理计划(ACP)做准备。会议由全科医生(gp)邀请他们的病人或其他针对老年人的组织组织。目的:评估信息会议是否刺激ACP(与亲属、医疗保健专业人员和文件的对话),以及会议类型(全科医生与其他)和与会者的特征是否与会议后与全科医生进行ACP对话有关。方法:采用介入前、介入后问卷调查法,于介入前、介入后6个月进行问卷调查。举办了98次新闻会议(53次由普通科医生举行;45次由其他组织举行)。老年人参加会议并在T0 (N=1,917)和T2 (N=1,088)填写问卷。描述性统计和逻辑回归分析。结果:在T2时,26.4%的参与者与他们的GP进行了ACP对话,作为对信息会议的回应。此外,更多的老年人在T2时与亲属记录(T0: 39%; T2: 53%)并讨论他们的愿望(T0: 61%; T2: 84%)。ACP与全科医生的接触在全科医生会议或其他会议之间没有区别。年龄(OR 1.05)、非荷兰背景(OR 2.41)、宗教信仰(OR 0.68)以及之前与医生讨论过临终话题(OR 2.38)与与全科医生进行ACP对话相关。结论:临终关怀信息会促进老年人与全科医生和亲属进行ACP对话,并记录意愿。全科医生或其他人的会议类型不会影响ACP与其全科医生的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信