Mitchell Kiely, Metin Ahiskali, Etienne Borde, Benjamin Bowman, David Bowman, Dirk Van Bruggen, K. C. Cowan, Prithviraj Dasgupta, Erich Devendorf, Ben Edwards, Alex Fitts, Sunny Fugate, Ryan Gabrys, Wayne Gould, H. Howie Huang, Jules Jacobs, Ryan Kerr, Isaiah J. King, Li Li, Luis Martinez, Christopher Moir, Craig Murphy, Olivia Naish, Claire Owens, Miranda Purchase, Ahmad Ridley, Adrian Taylor, Sara Farmer, William John Valentine, Yiyi Zhang
{"title":"CAGE challenge 4: A scalable multi-agent reinforcement learning gym for autonomous cyber defence","authors":"Mitchell Kiely, Metin Ahiskali, Etienne Borde, Benjamin Bowman, David Bowman, Dirk Van Bruggen, K. C. Cowan, Prithviraj Dasgupta, Erich Devendorf, Ben Edwards, Alex Fitts, Sunny Fugate, Ryan Gabrys, Wayne Gould, H. Howie Huang, Jules Jacobs, Ryan Kerr, Isaiah J. King, Li Li, Luis Martinez, Christopher Moir, Craig Murphy, Olivia Naish, Claire Owens, Miranda Purchase, Ahmad Ridley, Adrian Taylor, Sara Farmer, William John Valentine, Yiyi Zhang","doi":"10.1002/aaai.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As cyber threats become increasingly automated and sophisticated, novel solutions must be introduced to improve defense of enterprise networks. Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has demonstrated potential in mitigating these advanced threats. Single DRL agents have proven utility toward execution of autonomous cyber defense. Despite the success of employing single DRL agents, this approach presents significant limitations, especially regarding scalability within large enterprise networks. An attractive alternative to the single-agent approach is the use of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). However, developing MARL agents is costly with few options for examining MARL cyber defense techniques against adversarial agents. This paper presents a MARL network security environment, the fourth iteration of the cyber autonomy gym for experimentation (CAGE) challenges. This challenge was specifically designed to test the efficacy of MARL algorithms in an enterprise network. Our work aims to evaluate the potential of MARL as a robust and scalable solution for autonomous network defense.</p>","PeriodicalId":7854,"journal":{"name":"Ai Magazine","volume":"46 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aaai.70021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ai Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aaai.70021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As cyber threats become increasingly automated and sophisticated, novel solutions must be introduced to improve defense of enterprise networks. Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has demonstrated potential in mitigating these advanced threats. Single DRL agents have proven utility toward execution of autonomous cyber defense. Despite the success of employing single DRL agents, this approach presents significant limitations, especially regarding scalability within large enterprise networks. An attractive alternative to the single-agent approach is the use of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). However, developing MARL agents is costly with few options for examining MARL cyber defense techniques against adversarial agents. This paper presents a MARL network security environment, the fourth iteration of the cyber autonomy gym for experimentation (CAGE) challenges. This challenge was specifically designed to test the efficacy of MARL algorithms in an enterprise network. Our work aims to evaluate the potential of MARL as a robust and scalable solution for autonomous network defense.
期刊介绍:
AI Magazine publishes original articles that are reasonably self-contained and aimed at a broad spectrum of the AI community. Technical content should be kept to a minimum. In general, the magazine does not publish articles that have been published elsewhere in whole or in part. The magazine welcomes the contribution of articles on the theory and practice of AI as well as general survey articles, tutorial articles on timely topics, conference or symposia or workshop reports, and timely columns on topics of interest to AI scientists.