{"title":"On the multiplicity of artifacts: A typology including regulatory artifacts","authors":"Stefano Moroni, Anita De Franco","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2025.101356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There are various studies on specific types of artifacts. Many of them have focused on “technical artifacts” and “cognitive artifacts”; and, more recently, other studies have examined “regulatory artifacts”. However, a general typology is still lacking. This article aims to build such a typological framework based on the identification of three macro-categories of artifacts – i.e. behaviour-supporting, behaviour-engaging, and behaviour-influencing – and on the identification of ten sub-categories within them: (i) descriptive artifacts; (ii) technical artifacts; (iii) cognitive artifacts; (iv) detecting artifacts; (v) ludic artifacts; (vi) artistic artifacts; (vii) status artifacts; (viii) deontic artifacts; (ix) constitutive artifacts; (x) steering artifacts. On the basis of this typology, five points are highlighted. First, the suggested typology illustrates how many human activities are mediated by some kind of artifact; we could say that artifacts have not only been the product of human intelligence but they have also been an active trigger of it. Second, the proposed typology sheds light on the fact that artifacts can perform not only traditionally, widely discussed technical or cognitive functions but also regulatory ones. Third, if regulatory artifacts are also considered, the maker's intentionality is confirmed as being of central importance in defining what artifacts are. Fourth, the proposed typology shows that the different types of artifacts produce their effects in different ways: in certain cases, their performance is for instance mainly based on causal mechanisms, whilst in other cases on mainly symbolic mechanisms. Fifth, the typology illuminates significant differences between humans and animals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50593,"journal":{"name":"Design Studies","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 101356"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Studies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X25000687","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There are various studies on specific types of artifacts. Many of them have focused on “technical artifacts” and “cognitive artifacts”; and, more recently, other studies have examined “regulatory artifacts”. However, a general typology is still lacking. This article aims to build such a typological framework based on the identification of three macro-categories of artifacts – i.e. behaviour-supporting, behaviour-engaging, and behaviour-influencing – and on the identification of ten sub-categories within them: (i) descriptive artifacts; (ii) technical artifacts; (iii) cognitive artifacts; (iv) detecting artifacts; (v) ludic artifacts; (vi) artistic artifacts; (vii) status artifacts; (viii) deontic artifacts; (ix) constitutive artifacts; (x) steering artifacts. On the basis of this typology, five points are highlighted. First, the suggested typology illustrates how many human activities are mediated by some kind of artifact; we could say that artifacts have not only been the product of human intelligence but they have also been an active trigger of it. Second, the proposed typology sheds light on the fact that artifacts can perform not only traditionally, widely discussed technical or cognitive functions but also regulatory ones. Third, if regulatory artifacts are also considered, the maker's intentionality is confirmed as being of central importance in defining what artifacts are. Fourth, the proposed typology shows that the different types of artifacts produce their effects in different ways: in certain cases, their performance is for instance mainly based on causal mechanisms, whilst in other cases on mainly symbolic mechanisms. Fifth, the typology illuminates significant differences between humans and animals.
期刊介绍:
Design Studies is a leading international academic journal focused on developing understanding of design processes. It studies design activity across all domains of application, including engineering and product design, architectural and urban design, computer artefacts and systems design. It therefore provides an interdisciplinary forum for the analysis, development and discussion of fundamental aspects of design activity, from cognition and methodology to values and philosophy.
Design Studies publishes work that is concerned with the process of designing, and is relevant to a broad audience of researchers, teachers and practitioners. We welcome original, scientific and scholarly research papers reporting studies concerned with the process of designing in all its many fields, or furthering the development and application of new knowledge relating to design process. Papers should be written to be intelligible and pertinent to a wide range of readership across different design domains. To be relevant for this journal, a paper has to offer something that gives new insight into or knowledge about the design process, or assists new development of the processes of designing.