Preschool dosage, outcomes, and mechanisms: Why are two years better than one?

IF 2.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Early Childhood Research Quarterly Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.10.004
Meghan E. McDoniel , Catie Connolly , Lily Steyer , Jelena Obradović
{"title":"Preschool dosage, outcomes, and mechanisms: Why are two years better than one?","authors":"Meghan E. McDoniel ,&nbsp;Catie Connolly ,&nbsp;Lily Steyer ,&nbsp;Jelena Obradović","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given recent expansions in preschool programs provided by school districts, there is a need to understand the association between preschool dosage (i.e., the number of years children attend preschool) and school readiness, and to identify factors that mediate these associations in order to maximize the efficacy of preschool for public school students. The current study examined the estimated effects of preschool dosage (one year vs. two years) on school readiness in the San Francisco Unified School District’s targeted preschool programs. Children who attended preschool for one year or two years were matched on race/ethnicity, sex, home language status, IEP status, subsidy status, and age (<em>N</em> = 2,368; Asian/PI=28%; Black=16%; White=14.0%; Latinx=30%; female=48 %; <em>M<sub>age</sub>=</em>4.38). Path analyses tested two mediators: fall skills and attendance in the final year of preschool. Relative to one year, children with two years of preschool had higher cognitive, social-emotional, and literacy skills by the end of preschool. Fall skills and attendance during the final year of preschool mediated the estimated effects of preschool dosage on children’s skills at the end of preschool, with literacy being the most robust mediator among fall skills. Sensitivity analyses found these effects carried over to children’s total score on a school readiness screener administered at kindergarten entry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"74 ","pages":"Pages 242-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200625001024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given recent expansions in preschool programs provided by school districts, there is a need to understand the association between preschool dosage (i.e., the number of years children attend preschool) and school readiness, and to identify factors that mediate these associations in order to maximize the efficacy of preschool for public school students. The current study examined the estimated effects of preschool dosage (one year vs. two years) on school readiness in the San Francisco Unified School District’s targeted preschool programs. Children who attended preschool for one year or two years were matched on race/ethnicity, sex, home language status, IEP status, subsidy status, and age (N = 2,368; Asian/PI=28%; Black=16%; White=14.0%; Latinx=30%; female=48 %; Mage=4.38). Path analyses tested two mediators: fall skills and attendance in the final year of preschool. Relative to one year, children with two years of preschool had higher cognitive, social-emotional, and literacy skills by the end of preschool. Fall skills and attendance during the final year of preschool mediated the estimated effects of preschool dosage on children’s skills at the end of preschool, with literacy being the most robust mediator among fall skills. Sensitivity analyses found these effects carried over to children’s total score on a school readiness screener administered at kindergarten entry.
学龄前剂量,结果和机制:为什么两年比一年好?
鉴于最近学区提供的学前教育项目的扩展,有必要了解学前教育剂量(即儿童参加学前教育的年数)与入学准备之间的关系,并确定调解这些关系的因素,以便最大限度地提高公立学校学生的学前教育效率。目前的研究调查了在旧金山联合学区的目标学前教育项目中,学龄前剂量(一年vs两年)对入学准备的估计影响。在学前班就读一年或两年的儿童按种族/民族、性别、家庭语言状况、IEP状况、补贴状况和年龄进行匹配(N = 2368;亚洲/PI=28%;黑人=16%;白人=14.0%;拉丁裔=30%;女性= 48%;Mage=4.38)。路径分析测试了两个中介:跌倒技能和学龄前最后一年的出勤率。相对于一年,两年学前班的孩子在学前班结束时具有更高的认知、社会情感和读写技能。学龄前最后一年的跌倒技能和出勤率介导了学龄前剂量对学龄前结束时儿童技能的估计影响,其中识字是跌倒技能中最有效的中介。敏感性分析发现,在幼儿园入学时进行的入学准备筛查中,这些影响会延续到孩子的总分上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书