Meghan E. McDoniel , Catie Connolly , Lily Steyer , Jelena Obradović
{"title":"Preschool dosage, outcomes, and mechanisms: Why are two years better than one?","authors":"Meghan E. McDoniel , Catie Connolly , Lily Steyer , Jelena Obradović","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given recent expansions in preschool programs provided by school districts, there is a need to understand the association between preschool dosage (i.e., the number of years children attend preschool) and school readiness, and to identify factors that mediate these associations in order to maximize the efficacy of preschool for public school students. The current study examined the estimated effects of preschool dosage (one year vs. two years) on school readiness in the San Francisco Unified School District’s targeted preschool programs. Children who attended preschool for one year or two years were matched on race/ethnicity, sex, home language status, IEP status, subsidy status, and age (<em>N</em> = 2,368; Asian/PI=28%; Black=16%; White=14.0%; Latinx=30%; female=48 %; <em>M<sub>age</sub>=</em>4.38). Path analyses tested two mediators: fall skills and attendance in the final year of preschool. Relative to one year, children with two years of preschool had higher cognitive, social-emotional, and literacy skills by the end of preschool. Fall skills and attendance during the final year of preschool mediated the estimated effects of preschool dosage on children’s skills at the end of preschool, with literacy being the most robust mediator among fall skills. Sensitivity analyses found these effects carried over to children’s total score on a school readiness screener administered at kindergarten entry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"74 ","pages":"Pages 242-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200625001024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Given recent expansions in preschool programs provided by school districts, there is a need to understand the association between preschool dosage (i.e., the number of years children attend preschool) and school readiness, and to identify factors that mediate these associations in order to maximize the efficacy of preschool for public school students. The current study examined the estimated effects of preschool dosage (one year vs. two years) on school readiness in the San Francisco Unified School District’s targeted preschool programs. Children who attended preschool for one year or two years were matched on race/ethnicity, sex, home language status, IEP status, subsidy status, and age (N = 2,368; Asian/PI=28%; Black=16%; White=14.0%; Latinx=30%; female=48 %; Mage=4.38). Path analyses tested two mediators: fall skills and attendance in the final year of preschool. Relative to one year, children with two years of preschool had higher cognitive, social-emotional, and literacy skills by the end of preschool. Fall skills and attendance during the final year of preschool mediated the estimated effects of preschool dosage on children’s skills at the end of preschool, with literacy being the most robust mediator among fall skills. Sensitivity analyses found these effects carried over to children’s total score on a school readiness screener administered at kindergarten entry.
期刊介绍:
For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.