Jean-Pierre Vilardaga , Satyaki Saha , Ji Young Lee , Lisa J. Clark , Ivet Bahar
{"title":"Allosteric modulation of Class B1 G protein-coupled receptor activation and signaling location in the cell","authors":"Jean-Pierre Vilardaga , Satyaki Saha , Ji Young Lee , Lisa J. Clark , Ivet Bahar","doi":"10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is now widely accepted that allosteric signaling is beyond signal transmission to, or conformational change triggered at, a distal point within a structure; it also affects different cellular pathways and functions depending on the specific allosteric modulators. A family of signaling molecules that has attracted wide attention in recent years is the Class B1 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In the classic view of GPCR signaling, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production is accepted to be uniquely associated with signaling events at the plasma membrane. However, a growing number of studies over the past decade, especially for the parathyroid hormone type 1 receptor (PTH<sub>1</sub>R), demonstrate that cAMP is also produced at the endosomes through a different pathway after receptor internalization. Recent advances in the structural and computational characterization of this family of allosteric receptors provide new insights into the mechanisms of their activation or inhibition, as well as determinants of differential allosteric signaling. We focus on PTH<sub>1</sub>R as a prototypical member of the family and present our current understanding of the role of selected ligands in acting as positive or negative allosteric modulators and eliciting signaling location biases in the cell.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10887,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in structural biology","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 103170"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in structural biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959440X25001885","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It is now widely accepted that allosteric signaling is beyond signal transmission to, or conformational change triggered at, a distal point within a structure; it also affects different cellular pathways and functions depending on the specific allosteric modulators. A family of signaling molecules that has attracted wide attention in recent years is the Class B1 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In the classic view of GPCR signaling, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production is accepted to be uniquely associated with signaling events at the plasma membrane. However, a growing number of studies over the past decade, especially for the parathyroid hormone type 1 receptor (PTH1R), demonstrate that cAMP is also produced at the endosomes through a different pathway after receptor internalization. Recent advances in the structural and computational characterization of this family of allosteric receptors provide new insights into the mechanisms of their activation or inhibition, as well as determinants of differential allosteric signaling. We focus on PTH1R as a prototypical member of the family and present our current understanding of the role of selected ligands in acting as positive or negative allosteric modulators and eliciting signaling location biases in the cell.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Structural Biology (COSB) aims to stimulate scientifically grounded, interdisciplinary, multi-scale debate and exchange of ideas. It contains polished, concise and timely reviews and opinions, with particular emphasis on those articles published in the past two years. In addition to describing recent trends, the authors are encouraged to give their subjective opinion of the topics discussed.
In COSB, we help the reader by providing in a systematic manner:
1. The views of experts on current advances in their field in a clear and readable form.
2. Evaluations of the most interesting papers, annotated by experts, from the great wealth of original publications.
[...]
The subject of Structural Biology is divided into twelve themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year. Each issue contains two sections, and the amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance.
-Folding and Binding-
Nucleic acids and their protein complexes-
Macromolecular Machines-
Theory and Simulation-
Sequences and Topology-
New constructs and expression of proteins-
Membranes-
Engineering and Design-
Carbohydrate-protein interactions and glycosylation-
Biophysical and molecular biological methods-
Multi-protein assemblies in signalling-
Catalysis and Regulation