Oscar Arturo Benítez-Cárdenas, Néstor Oliver Herrera-Salguero, Elhi Manuel Torres-Hernández, Miguel Angel Noyola-Frías, Ricardo Martínez-Rider, Marlen Vitales-Noyola
{"title":"Three-Dimensional Airway Assessment as Diagnostic Aid in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.","authors":"Oscar Arturo Benítez-Cárdenas, Néstor Oliver Herrera-Salguero, Elhi Manuel Torres-Hernández, Miguel Angel Noyola-Frías, Ricardo Martínez-Rider, Marlen Vitales-Noyola","doi":"10.3390/pathophysiology32040050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) is a prevalent and underdiagnosed condition with significant systemic and quality-of-life impacts. While polysomnography remains the gold standard for diagnosis, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) presents a potential adjunctive imaging tool for anatomical airway evaluation. <b>Objective</b>: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of three-dimensional airway evaluation via CBCT as a complementary diagnostic tool for OSAS. <b>Methods</b>: A diagnostic test study (experimental pilot study) was conducted using CBCT scans of 30 patients, divided into two groups: 15 scans from patients with a confirmed OSAS diagnosis through polysomnography and 15 scans from healthy controls. Five tomographic variables were analyzed: anteroposterior distance, lateral distance, minimum cross-sectional area, airway volume, and airway shape. Statistical analysis was performed comparing both groups. <b>Results</b>: The minimum cross-sectional area and airway volume showed statistically significant differences between the OSAS and control groups (<i>p</i> = 0.038 and <i>p</i> = 0.0055, respectively). Anteroposterior and lateral distances showed trends toward significance but were not statistically significant. <b>Conclusions</b>: CBCT-based airway analysis, particularly focusing on volumetric and cross-sectional area parameters, demonstrates strong potential as a complementary tool in the diagnosis of peripheral-type OSAS. However, it cannot replace polysomnography, especially for central OSAS diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":520741,"journal":{"name":"Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12551104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathophysiology32040050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) is a prevalent and underdiagnosed condition with significant systemic and quality-of-life impacts. While polysomnography remains the gold standard for diagnosis, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) presents a potential adjunctive imaging tool for anatomical airway evaluation. Objective: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of three-dimensional airway evaluation via CBCT as a complementary diagnostic tool for OSAS. Methods: A diagnostic test study (experimental pilot study) was conducted using CBCT scans of 30 patients, divided into two groups: 15 scans from patients with a confirmed OSAS diagnosis through polysomnography and 15 scans from healthy controls. Five tomographic variables were analyzed: anteroposterior distance, lateral distance, minimum cross-sectional area, airway volume, and airway shape. Statistical analysis was performed comparing both groups. Results: The minimum cross-sectional area and airway volume showed statistically significant differences between the OSAS and control groups (p = 0.038 and p = 0.0055, respectively). Anteroposterior and lateral distances showed trends toward significance but were not statistically significant. Conclusions: CBCT-based airway analysis, particularly focusing on volumetric and cross-sectional area parameters, demonstrates strong potential as a complementary tool in the diagnosis of peripheral-type OSAS. However, it cannot replace polysomnography, especially for central OSAS diagnosis.