Predictors of Advance Directive Changes in Ontario Nursing Home Residents: A Case-Control Study.

IF 4.5
Hannah J Wong, Hsien Seow, Anastasia Gayowsky, Robert C Wu, Hilda Lim, Rinku Sutradhar
{"title":"Predictors of Advance Directive Changes in Ontario Nursing Home Residents: A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Hannah J Wong, Hsien Seow, Anastasia Gayowsky, Robert C Wu, Hilda Lim, Rinku Sutradhar","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Goals of care (GOC) discussions between the clinical team and nursing home (NH) residents provide the basis for decision-making on advance directives (AD) that include do-not-resuscitate (DNR) and do-not-hospitalize (DNH). Optimal timing and prompts for initiating GOC discussions are unclear. This study investigates recent emergency department (ED) use and clinical and demographic factors associated with subsequent AD changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nested case-control study within a population-based retrospective cohort using linked administrative health care data of individuals admitted to NHs in Ontario, Canada between 2013 and 2017 and then followed up until 2019. Eligible cases and controls were residents with and without an AD change between 2013 and 2019, respectively. Cases and controls were matched 1:1 by sex, composite AD at NH admission, NH admission date (±90 days), and birthdate (±365 days). The primary outcome was incident AD change, and exposures included recent ED use (either ED visits discharged back to NH or ED visits that resulted in hospitalization) and clinical and demographic variables measured at the time of documented AD change. Conditional logistic regression provided adjusted odds ratios for associations between exposures and incident AD change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cases and controls (27,942 residents) had a mean age of 84 years at NH admission and 67.1% were female. 48.3% had a baseline AD of \"DNR Only\" while the remaining were evenly divided between \"Full Code\" and \"DNR+DNH.\" The estimated adjusted odds ratio of AD change was 2.01 (95% CI, 1.83-2.21) in residents with recent hospitalization, 1.89 (95% CI, 1.67-2.13) in those having end-stage disease, and 1.82 (95% CI, 1.56-2.12) in residents who were mostly bedfast.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A recent hospitalization, end-stage disease, or being bedfast are significant predictors of AD change. These important predictors exhibited by NH residents present opportunities to reassess GOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Goals of care (GOC) discussions between the clinical team and nursing home (NH) residents provide the basis for decision-making on advance directives (AD) that include do-not-resuscitate (DNR) and do-not-hospitalize (DNH). Optimal timing and prompts for initiating GOC discussions are unclear. This study investigates recent emergency department (ED) use and clinical and demographic factors associated with subsequent AD changes.

Methods: Nested case-control study within a population-based retrospective cohort using linked administrative health care data of individuals admitted to NHs in Ontario, Canada between 2013 and 2017 and then followed up until 2019. Eligible cases and controls were residents with and without an AD change between 2013 and 2019, respectively. Cases and controls were matched 1:1 by sex, composite AD at NH admission, NH admission date (±90 days), and birthdate (±365 days). The primary outcome was incident AD change, and exposures included recent ED use (either ED visits discharged back to NH or ED visits that resulted in hospitalization) and clinical and demographic variables measured at the time of documented AD change. Conditional logistic regression provided adjusted odds ratios for associations between exposures and incident AD change.

Results: The cases and controls (27,942 residents) had a mean age of 84 years at NH admission and 67.1% were female. 48.3% had a baseline AD of "DNR Only" while the remaining were evenly divided between "Full Code" and "DNR+DNH." The estimated adjusted odds ratio of AD change was 2.01 (95% CI, 1.83-2.21) in residents with recent hospitalization, 1.89 (95% CI, 1.67-2.13) in those having end-stage disease, and 1.82 (95% CI, 1.56-2.12) in residents who were mostly bedfast.

Conclusions: A recent hospitalization, end-stage disease, or being bedfast are significant predictors of AD change. These important predictors exhibited by NH residents present opportunities to reassess GOC.

安大略省养老院居民预先指示改变的预测因素:一项病例对照研究。
背景:临床团队和疗养院(NH)居民之间的护理目标(GOC)讨论为包括不复苏(DNR)和不住院(DNH)在内的预先指示(AD)的决策提供了基础。目前尚不清楚启动GOC讨论的最佳时机和提示。本研究调查了近期急诊科(ED)的使用以及与随后AD变化相关的临床和人口因素。方法:在基于人群的回顾性队列中进行巢式病例对照研究,使用2013年至2017年加拿大安大略省NHs住院患者的相关行政卫生保健数据,然后随访至2019年。符合条件的病例和对照组分别是2013年至2019年期间AD发生变化和未发生AD变化的居民。按性别、NH入院时复合AD、NH入院日期(±90天)和出生日期(±365天)进行1:1匹配。主要结果是偶发性AD改变,暴露包括最近的ED使用(出院回NH的ED访问或导致住院的ED访问)以及在记录的AD改变时测量的临床和人口统计学变量。条件逻辑回归为暴露与AD变化之间的关系提供了调整后的优势比。结果:病例和对照组(27942人)入院时平均年龄84岁,67.1%为女性。48.3%的患者基线AD为“仅DNR”,其余患者平均分为“全码”和“DNR+DNH”。近期住院患者AD变化的校正比值比估计为2.01 (95% CI, 1.83-2.21),终末期疾病患者为1.89 (95% CI, 1.67-2.13),大部分卧床患者为1.82 (95% CI, 1.56-2.12)。结论:近期住院、终末期疾病或卧床是AD改变的重要预测因素。这些重要的预测因子在NH居民中表现出来,为重新评估GOC提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信