Social movements and the Whitlam-initiated community health movement in Australia.

IF 1.3
Fran Baum, Connie Musolino, Toby Freeman, Denise Fry, Paul Laris, Virginia Lewis, David Legge, Jenny Macmillan, Tony McBride
{"title":"Social movements and the Whitlam-initiated community health movement in Australia.","authors":"Fran Baum, Connie Musolino, Toby Freeman, Denise Fry, Paul Laris, Virginia Lewis, David Legge, Jenny Macmillan, Tony McBride","doi":"10.1071/PY24167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper examines the social movements that influenced the development and implementation of the original Whitlam Government Community Health Program, the community health movement that emerged, and the opportunities it created for people to develop and deliver health programs in new ways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Oral history interviews with 93 people involved in community health in South Australia, Victoria and New South Wales, and 212 community health policy and archival documents were collected as a part of an Australian Research Council study documenting the history of community health services in Australia since the 1970s.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ideas about community health in Australia were influenced by several social movements that had overlapping, but distinctive, contributions: (1) left-wing movements: political parties, workers' health; trade unions, anti-war and anti-establishment; (2) international social medicine and community-oriented primary care; (3) Indigenous rights/Black Power; (4) feminist; and (5) community development/community power. These movements influenced Australian community health to embrace community management, advocacy and community development strategies in addition to multi-disciplinary care. However, these progressive elements were undermined by neo-liberal management reforms and medical opposition to elements of the Community Health Program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The early passion for community health in the 1970s and 1980s was fuelled by social movements, but the inconsistent support from the federal and most state governments limited progressive and innovative community health practice. The window of opportunity for the Community Health Program was supported by progressive social movements, but restricted from the 1990s onwards.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This paper examines the social movements that influenced the development and implementation of the original Whitlam Government Community Health Program, the community health movement that emerged, and the opportunities it created for people to develop and deliver health programs in new ways.

Methods: Oral history interviews with 93 people involved in community health in South Australia, Victoria and New South Wales, and 212 community health policy and archival documents were collected as a part of an Australian Research Council study documenting the history of community health services in Australia since the 1970s.

Results: Ideas about community health in Australia were influenced by several social movements that had overlapping, but distinctive, contributions: (1) left-wing movements: political parties, workers' health; trade unions, anti-war and anti-establishment; (2) international social medicine and community-oriented primary care; (3) Indigenous rights/Black Power; (4) feminist; and (5) community development/community power. These movements influenced Australian community health to embrace community management, advocacy and community development strategies in addition to multi-disciplinary care. However, these progressive elements were undermined by neo-liberal management reforms and medical opposition to elements of the Community Health Program.

Conclusions: The early passion for community health in the 1970s and 1980s was fuelled by social movements, but the inconsistent support from the federal and most state governments limited progressive and innovative community health practice. The window of opportunity for the Community Health Program was supported by progressive social movements, but restricted from the 1990s onwards.

社会运动和惠特拉姆在澳大利亚发起的社区卫生运动。
背景:本文考察了影响最初惠特拉姆政府社区卫生计划发展和实施的社会运动,出现的社区卫生运动,以及它为人们以新的方式发展和提供卫生计划创造的机会。方法:作为澳大利亚研究委员会自20世纪70年代以来记录澳大利亚社区卫生服务历史的研究的一部分,对南澳大利亚、维多利亚州和新南威尔士州参与社区卫生的93人进行了口述历史访谈,并收集了212份社区卫生政策和档案文件。结果:澳大利亚的社区健康观念受到几个社会运动的影响,这些运动有重叠但又有特色:(1)左翼运动:政党、工人健康;工会、反战和反建制;(2)国际社会医学和社区初级保健;(3)土著权利/黑人权力;(4)女权主义;(5)社区发展/社区力量。这些运动影响了澳大利亚社区保健,使其除了多学科护理外,还包括社区管理、宣传和社区发展战略。然而,这些进步的因素被新自由主义的管理改革和医学界对社区卫生计划的反对所破坏。结论:20世纪70年代和80年代对社区卫生的早期热情是由社会运动推动的,但联邦政府和大多数州政府的不一致支持限制了进步和创新的社区卫生实践。社区卫生方案的机会之窗得到了进步社会运动的支持,但从1990年代开始受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书