Michelle D Lockwood, Christopher F Hovorka, Molly E Baumann, W Lee Childers
{"title":"Clinical outcome of Two Minute Walk Test after return to run program in IDEO users: a retrospective study.","authors":"Michelle D Lockwood, Christopher F Hovorka, Molly E Baumann, W Lee Childers","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2025.1602110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate clinical improvement in persons with severe musculoskeletal injuries following a 4-week high intensity sports-based return to run rehabilitation therapy program (RTR) combined with use of an Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>41 persons (37 male and 4 female) with lower limb musculoskeletal injuries undergoing treatment and rehabilitation at the Center for the Intrepid were included in the retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of clinical data was used to identify changes in Two Minute Walk Test (2MWT) outcomes in patients with lower limb musculoskeletal injuries without the IDEO, with the IDEO alone and after IDEO + RTR. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to examine differences in distance walked across the three groups (NO IDEO, IDEO alone, and IDEO + RTR). Bonferroni <i>post-hoc</i> analysis was performed, and a level of significance was set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant difference in distance walked between all groups was observed (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients' mean distance walked using the IDEO alone (179 m, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and IDEO + RTR (208 m, <i>p</i> < 0.001) increased significantly compared to NO IDEO (152 m, <i>p</i> < 0.001). These differences surpass the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (37.2 m) and the Minimal Detectable Change (34.3 m) for the 2MWT in the limb loss population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data suggest the potential benefit of the combination of IDEO + RTR improved walking in patients with lower limb musculoskeletal injuries and suggest the 2MWT may be a meaningful, simple measure to detect improvement in function.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"6 ","pages":"1602110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12540400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1602110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate clinical improvement in persons with severe musculoskeletal injuries following a 4-week high intensity sports-based return to run rehabilitation therapy program (RTR) combined with use of an Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO).
Patients: 41 persons (37 male and 4 female) with lower limb musculoskeletal injuries undergoing treatment and rehabilitation at the Center for the Intrepid were included in the retrospective cohort study.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical data was used to identify changes in Two Minute Walk Test (2MWT) outcomes in patients with lower limb musculoskeletal injuries without the IDEO, with the IDEO alone and after IDEO + RTR. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to examine differences in distance walked across the three groups (NO IDEO, IDEO alone, and IDEO + RTR). Bonferroni post-hoc analysis was performed, and a level of significance was set at 0.05.
Results: A statistically significant difference in distance walked between all groups was observed (p < 0.001). Patients' mean distance walked using the IDEO alone (179 m, p < 0.001) and IDEO + RTR (208 m, p < 0.001) increased significantly compared to NO IDEO (152 m, p < 0.001). These differences surpass the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (37.2 m) and the Minimal Detectable Change (34.3 m) for the 2MWT in the limb loss population.
Conclusion: These data suggest the potential benefit of the combination of IDEO + RTR improved walking in patients with lower limb musculoskeletal injuries and suggest the 2MWT may be a meaningful, simple measure to detect improvement in function.
目的:探讨重度肌肉骨骼损伤患者在接受为期4周的高强度运动康复治疗(RTR)并使用Intrepid动态外骨骼矫形器(IDEO)后的临床改善情况。患者:41名下肢肌肉骨骼损伤患者(37名男性,4名女性)在无畏者中心接受治疗和康复,纳入回顾性队列研究。方法:回顾性分析临床数据,以确定两分钟步行试验(2MWT)结果的变化在下肢肌肉骨骼损伤患者没有IDEO,单独使用IDEO和IDEO + RTR后。采用重复测量方差分析(repeated measures ANOVA)检验三组(不使用IDEO、单独使用IDEO和IDEO + RTR)行走距离的差异。进行Bonferroni事后分析,显著性水平设为0.05。结果:两组间行走距离差异有统计学意义(p p p p p)。结论:这些数据提示IDEO + RTR联合改善下肢肌肉骨骼损伤患者行走的潜在益处,提示2MWT可能是一种有意义的、简单的检测功能改善的方法。