Venous blood point-of-care testing (POCT) for paramedics in urgent and emergency care: a single-site feasibility study (POCTPara).

Andrew Hodge, Bryan Lightowler, Richard Pilbery, Fiona Bell, Pete Best, Kelly Hird, Beverly Snaith, Alison Walker
{"title":"Venous blood point-of-care testing (POCT) for paramedics in urgent and emergency care: a single-site feasibility study (POCTPara).","authors":"Andrew Hodge, Bryan Lightowler, Richard Pilbery, Fiona Bell, Pete Best, Kelly Hird, Beverly Snaith, Alison Walker","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2025.6.10.1.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Paramedics play an important role in addressing the growing demands in urgent and emergency care. Point-of-care testing (POCT) devices are increasingly portable and may assist with appropriate non-conveyance, but limited research exists to support this. This feasibility study aimed to inform the design of a larger study to determine whether it is practical for paramedics to use blood analysis POCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An eight-month single-site feasibility sequential explanatory mixed-method study was conducted between April and December 2023, with a team of specialist paramedics who were provided with Abbott® <i>i-STAT Alinity</i>™ POCT devices with CHEM8+ and CG4+ cartridges. Using a qualitative evaluation of paramedic participants' experience with a POCT device and a descriptive analysis of case report forms and routine ambulance service data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven specialist paramedics were recruited; 287 patients were screened, of which 252 (88%) were excluded and 35 (12%) were recruited. Lack of mental capacity excluded 76% of cases. The mean age was 82 years; 40% of participants were female and 60% were male. Hospital conveyance rates were four (11%) of the recruited patients. In those recruited and not conveyed, the median time on scene was 120 minutes. The success rate to obtain a test result at the first attempt was 81% (CHEM8+) and 84% (CG4+). Test result failure rates were 13% (CHEM8+) and 3% (CG4+). Focus group data revealed that paramedic participants considered POCT useful for decision making and the device procedures to be acceptable. Paramedics reported that extended time on scene was related to trial procedures and waiting times to discuss test results with healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The POCT devices were acceptable and practical for use by our specialist paramedic participants. The results of this feasibility study should inform the design of a larger study to test the impact of using POCT, to understand challenges in recruitment and retention where POCT is utilised and to determine the clinical presentations where POCT can be applied.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"19-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12543071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2025.6.10.1.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Paramedics play an important role in addressing the growing demands in urgent and emergency care. Point-of-care testing (POCT) devices are increasingly portable and may assist with appropriate non-conveyance, but limited research exists to support this. This feasibility study aimed to inform the design of a larger study to determine whether it is practical for paramedics to use blood analysis POCT.

Methods: An eight-month single-site feasibility sequential explanatory mixed-method study was conducted between April and December 2023, with a team of specialist paramedics who were provided with Abbott® i-STAT Alinity™ POCT devices with CHEM8+ and CG4+ cartridges. Using a qualitative evaluation of paramedic participants' experience with a POCT device and a descriptive analysis of case report forms and routine ambulance service data collection.

Results: Seven specialist paramedics were recruited; 287 patients were screened, of which 252 (88%) were excluded and 35 (12%) were recruited. Lack of mental capacity excluded 76% of cases. The mean age was 82 years; 40% of participants were female and 60% were male. Hospital conveyance rates were four (11%) of the recruited patients. In those recruited and not conveyed, the median time on scene was 120 minutes. The success rate to obtain a test result at the first attempt was 81% (CHEM8+) and 84% (CG4+). Test result failure rates were 13% (CHEM8+) and 3% (CG4+). Focus group data revealed that paramedic participants considered POCT useful for decision making and the device procedures to be acceptable. Paramedics reported that extended time on scene was related to trial procedures and waiting times to discuss test results with healthcare professionals.

Conclusion: The POCT devices were acceptable and practical for use by our specialist paramedic participants. The results of this feasibility study should inform the design of a larger study to test the impact of using POCT, to understand challenges in recruitment and retention where POCT is utilised and to determine the clinical presentations where POCT can be applied.

急诊护理护理人员静脉血即时检测(POCT):单点可行性研究(POCTPara)
导读:护理人员在解决日益增长的紧急护理需求方面发挥着重要作用。即时检测(POCT)设备的便携性越来越高,可能有助于适当的非运输,但目前支持这一点的研究有限。本可行性研究旨在为设计一项更大的研究提供信息,以确定护理人员使用血液分析POCT是否可行。方法:在2023年4月至12月期间进行了一项为期8个月的单站点可行性顺序解释性混合方法研究,由一组专业护理人员提供Abbott®i-STAT Alinity™POCT设备,配备CHEM8+和CG4+卡带。对护理人员使用POCT设备的经验进行定性评估,并对病例报告表格和常规救护车服务数据收集进行描述性分析。结果:招募了7名专科护理人员;筛查287例患者,其中252例(88%)被排除,35例(12%)被招募。76%的病例因精神能力不足而被排除在外。平均年龄82岁;40%的参与者是女性,60%是男性。住院转院率为4(11%)。在那些被招募而没有被转移的人中,在现场的平均时间是120分钟。首次获得检测结果的成功率分别为81% (CHEM8+)和84% (CG4+)。试验结果失败率分别为13% (CHEM8+)和3% (CG4+)。焦点小组数据显示,护理人员参与者认为POCT对决策有用,设备程序是可接受的。护理人员报告说,在现场停留的时间延长与试验程序和与医疗保健专业人员讨论测试结果的等待时间有关。结论:POCT装置是可接受的和实用的我们的专业医护人员的参与者使用。这项可行性研究的结果应该为设计一项更大的研究提供信息,以测试使用POCT的影响,了解在使用POCT的地方招聘和保留的挑战,并确定POCT可以应用的临床表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书