Healing Right Way: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial Aiming to Enhance Quality of Life for Aboriginal Australian Survivors of Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Elizabeth Armstrong, Tapan Rai, Judith M. Katzenellenbogen, Sandra J. Thompson, Meaghan McAllister, Natalie Ciccone, Deborah Hersh, Leon Flicker, Dominique A. Cadilhac, Erin Godecke, Graeme J. Hankey, Neil Drew, Colleen Hayward, Deborah Woods, Mel Robinson, Ivan Lin, Sanita Kratina, Jane White, Juli Coffin
{"title":"Healing Right Way: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial Aiming to Enhance Quality of Life for Aboriginal Australian Survivors of Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury","authors":"Elizabeth Armstrong,&nbsp;Tapan Rai,&nbsp;Judith M. Katzenellenbogen,&nbsp;Sandra J. Thompson,&nbsp;Meaghan McAllister,&nbsp;Natalie Ciccone,&nbsp;Deborah Hersh,&nbsp;Leon Flicker,&nbsp;Dominique A. Cadilhac,&nbsp;Erin Godecke,&nbsp;Graeme J. Hankey,&nbsp;Neil Drew,&nbsp;Colleen Hayward,&nbsp;Deborah Woods,&nbsp;Mel Robinson,&nbsp;Ivan Lin,&nbsp;Sanita Kratina,&nbsp;Jane White,&nbsp;Juli Coffin","doi":"10.1111/ajr.70106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the effect of cultural security training (CST) for health professionals and access to an Aboriginal Brain Injury Coordinator (ABIC) for Aboriginal Australians with stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial; the intervention package consisted of CST for hospital professionals and 6-month access to ABICs providing education, support, liaison and advocacy; the commencement order of the intervention phase was randomised.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Four urban and four rural hospitals in Western Australia, 2018–2022.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Aboriginal adults ≥ 18 years hospitalised with stroke or TBI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Primary outcome was quality of life (Euro QOL–5D-3L Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)) score at 26 weeks post-injury. Secondary outcomes were modified Rankin Scale, Functional Independence Measure, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Modified Caregiver Strain Index at 12 and 26 weeks, rehabilitation occasions of service, hospital compliance with minimum processes of care (MPC), acceptability of interventions, feasibility of ABIC role and costs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 108 participants recruited (target 312), 75% rural residents; 26-week outcomes assessment completed for 78% of participants. The adjusted mean QoL showed no significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.83). The MPC outcome favored the intervention group, adjusted difference in means 6.8% at 26 weeks, 95% CI (0.40%, 13.26%). There were no significant differences between control and intervention groups for other secondary outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>CST and implementation of an ABIC were feasible, acceptable and improved care processes for a predominantly rural population. Health outcomes did not differ. The effects of the COVID-19 context are discussed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>ACTRN12618000139279</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":"33 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.70106","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.70106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To determine the effect of cultural security training (CST) for health professionals and access to an Aboriginal Brain Injury Coordinator (ABIC) for Aboriginal Australians with stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Design

A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial; the intervention package consisted of CST for hospital professionals and 6-month access to ABICs providing education, support, liaison and advocacy; the commencement order of the intervention phase was randomised.

Setting

Four urban and four rural hospitals in Western Australia, 2018–2022.

Participants

Aboriginal adults ≥ 18 years hospitalised with stroke or TBI.

Main Outcome Measures

Primary outcome was quality of life (Euro QOL–5D-3L Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)) score at 26 weeks post-injury. Secondary outcomes were modified Rankin Scale, Functional Independence Measure, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Modified Caregiver Strain Index at 12 and 26 weeks, rehabilitation occasions of service, hospital compliance with minimum processes of care (MPC), acceptability of interventions, feasibility of ABIC role and costs.

Results

In total, 108 participants recruited (target 312), 75% rural residents; 26-week outcomes assessment completed for 78% of participants. The adjusted mean QoL showed no significant difference (p = 0.83). The MPC outcome favored the intervention group, adjusted difference in means 6.8% at 26 weeks, 95% CI (0.40%, 13.26%). There were no significant differences between control and intervention groups for other secondary outcomes.

Conclusions

CST and implementation of an ABIC were feasible, acceptable and improved care processes for a predominantly rural population. Health outcomes did not differ. The effects of the COVID-19 context are discussed.

Trial Registration

ACTRN12618000139279

Abstract Image

正确的治疗方式:一项旨在提高澳大利亚土著中风和创伤性脑损伤幸存者生活质量的阶梯楔形随机对照试验。
目的:确定文化安全培训(CST)对卫生专业人员的影响,以及对澳大利亚土著中风或创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者获得土著脑损伤协调员(ABIC)的影响。设计:阶梯楔形聚类随机对照试验;一揽子干预措施包括为医院专业人员提供技术支助和6个月的ABICs服务,提供教育、支持、联络和宣传;干预阶段的开始顺序是随机的。设定:2018-2022年,西澳大利亚州的四所城市医院和四所农村医院。参与者:≥18岁因中风或TBI住院的土著成年人。主要结局指标:主要结局指标为损伤后26周的生活质量(欧洲QOL-5D-3L视觉模拟评分(EQ-VAS))评分。次要结局包括改进的Rankin量表、功能独立性量表、医院焦虑和抑郁量表、12周和26周时改进的照顾者压力指数、康复服务次数、医院对最低护理过程(MPC)的依从性、干预措施的可接受性、ABIC作用的可行性和成本。结果:共招募参与者108人(目标312人),75%为农村居民;78%的参与者完成了26周的结果评估。调整后的平均生活质量差异无统计学意义(p = 0.83)。MPC结果偏向干预组,26周时调整后的均值差异为6.8%,95% CI(0.40%, 13.26%)。对照组和干预组在其他次要结果上无显著差异。结论:CST和ABIC的实施对于主要是农村人口是可行的,可接受的和改进的护理过程。健康结果没有差异。讨论了COVID-19背景的影响。试验注册号:ACTRN12618000139279。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Australian Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书