Healing Right Way: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial Aiming to Enhance Quality of Life for Aboriginal Australian Survivors of Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury
Elizabeth Armstrong, Tapan Rai, Judith M. Katzenellenbogen, Sandra J. Thompson, Meaghan McAllister, Natalie Ciccone, Deborah Hersh, Leon Flicker, Dominique A. Cadilhac, Erin Godecke, Graeme J. Hankey, Neil Drew, Colleen Hayward, Deborah Woods, Mel Robinson, Ivan Lin, Sanita Kratina, Jane White, Juli Coffin
{"title":"Healing Right Way: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial Aiming to Enhance Quality of Life for Aboriginal Australian Survivors of Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury","authors":"Elizabeth Armstrong, Tapan Rai, Judith M. Katzenellenbogen, Sandra J. Thompson, Meaghan McAllister, Natalie Ciccone, Deborah Hersh, Leon Flicker, Dominique A. Cadilhac, Erin Godecke, Graeme J. Hankey, Neil Drew, Colleen Hayward, Deborah Woods, Mel Robinson, Ivan Lin, Sanita Kratina, Jane White, Juli Coffin","doi":"10.1111/ajr.70106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the effect of cultural security training (CST) for health professionals and access to an Aboriginal Brain Injury Coordinator (ABIC) for Aboriginal Australians with stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial; the intervention package consisted of CST for hospital professionals and 6-month access to ABICs providing education, support, liaison and advocacy; the commencement order of the intervention phase was randomised.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Four urban and four rural hospitals in Western Australia, 2018–2022.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Aboriginal adults ≥ 18 years hospitalised with stroke or TBI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Primary outcome was quality of life (Euro QOL–5D-3L Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)) score at 26 weeks post-injury. Secondary outcomes were modified Rankin Scale, Functional Independence Measure, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Modified Caregiver Strain Index at 12 and 26 weeks, rehabilitation occasions of service, hospital compliance with minimum processes of care (MPC), acceptability of interventions, feasibility of ABIC role and costs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 108 participants recruited (target 312), 75% rural residents; 26-week outcomes assessment completed for 78% of participants. The adjusted mean QoL showed no significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.83). The MPC outcome favored the intervention group, adjusted difference in means 6.8% at 26 weeks, 95% CI (0.40%, 13.26%). There were no significant differences between control and intervention groups for other secondary outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>CST and implementation of an ABIC were feasible, acceptable and improved care processes for a predominantly rural population. Health outcomes did not differ. The effects of the COVID-19 context are discussed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>ACTRN12618000139279</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":"33 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.70106","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.70106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To determine the effect of cultural security training (CST) for health professionals and access to an Aboriginal Brain Injury Coordinator (ABIC) for Aboriginal Australians with stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Design
A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial; the intervention package consisted of CST for hospital professionals and 6-month access to ABICs providing education, support, liaison and advocacy; the commencement order of the intervention phase was randomised.
Setting
Four urban and four rural hospitals in Western Australia, 2018–2022.
Participants
Aboriginal adults ≥ 18 years hospitalised with stroke or TBI.
Main Outcome Measures
Primary outcome was quality of life (Euro QOL–5D-3L Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)) score at 26 weeks post-injury. Secondary outcomes were modified Rankin Scale, Functional Independence Measure, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Modified Caregiver Strain Index at 12 and 26 weeks, rehabilitation occasions of service, hospital compliance with minimum processes of care (MPC), acceptability of interventions, feasibility of ABIC role and costs.
Results
In total, 108 participants recruited (target 312), 75% rural residents; 26-week outcomes assessment completed for 78% of participants. The adjusted mean QoL showed no significant difference (p = 0.83). The MPC outcome favored the intervention group, adjusted difference in means 6.8% at 26 weeks, 95% CI (0.40%, 13.26%). There were no significant differences between control and intervention groups for other secondary outcomes.
Conclusions
CST and implementation of an ABIC were feasible, acceptable and improved care processes for a predominantly rural population. Health outcomes did not differ. The effects of the COVID-19 context are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.