Jointly estimating individual and group networks from fMRI data.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Network Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-07-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1162/netn_a_00457
Don van den Bergh, Linda Douw, Zarah van der Pal, Tessa F Blanken, Anouk Schrantee, Maarten Marsman
{"title":"Jointly estimating individual and group networks from fMRI data.","authors":"Don van den Bergh, Linda Douw, Zarah van der Pal, Tessa F Blanken, Anouk Schrantee, Maarten Marsman","doi":"10.1162/netn_a_00457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In fMRI research, graphical models are used to uncover complex patterns of relationships between brain regions. Connectivity-based fMRI studies typically analyze nested data; raw observations, for example, BOLD responses, are nested within participants, which are nested within populations, for example, healthy controls. Often, studies ignore the nested structure and analyze participants either individually or in aggregate. This overlooks the distinction between within-participant and between-participant variance, which can lead to poor generalizability of results because group-level effects do not necessarily reflect effects for each member of the group and, at worst, risk paradoxical results where group-level effects are opposite to individual-level effects (e.g., Kievit, Frankenhuis, Waldorp, & Borsboom, 2013; Robinson, 2009; Simpson, 1951). To address these concerns, we propose a multilevel approach to model the fMRI networks, using a Gaussian graphical model at the individual level and a Curie-Weiss graphical model at the group level. Simulations show that our method outperforms individual or aggregate analysis in edge retrieval. We apply the proposed multilevel approach to resting-state fMRI data of 724 healthy participants, examining both their commonalities and individual differences. We not only recover the seven previously found resting-state networks at the group level but also observe considerable heterogeneity in the individual-level networks. Finally, we discuss the necessity of a multilevel approach, additional challenges, and possible future extensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48520,"journal":{"name":"Network Neuroscience","volume":"9 3","pages":"896-912"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12543299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Network Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In fMRI research, graphical models are used to uncover complex patterns of relationships between brain regions. Connectivity-based fMRI studies typically analyze nested data; raw observations, for example, BOLD responses, are nested within participants, which are nested within populations, for example, healthy controls. Often, studies ignore the nested structure and analyze participants either individually or in aggregate. This overlooks the distinction between within-participant and between-participant variance, which can lead to poor generalizability of results because group-level effects do not necessarily reflect effects for each member of the group and, at worst, risk paradoxical results where group-level effects are opposite to individual-level effects (e.g., Kievit, Frankenhuis, Waldorp, & Borsboom, 2013; Robinson, 2009; Simpson, 1951). To address these concerns, we propose a multilevel approach to model the fMRI networks, using a Gaussian graphical model at the individual level and a Curie-Weiss graphical model at the group level. Simulations show that our method outperforms individual or aggregate analysis in edge retrieval. We apply the proposed multilevel approach to resting-state fMRI data of 724 healthy participants, examining both their commonalities and individual differences. We not only recover the seven previously found resting-state networks at the group level but also observe considerable heterogeneity in the individual-level networks. Finally, we discuss the necessity of a multilevel approach, additional challenges, and possible future extensions.

从功能磁共振成像数据中联合估计个体和群体网络。
在功能磁共振成像研究中,图形模型被用来揭示大脑区域之间关系的复杂模式。基于连接的fMRI研究通常分析嵌套数据;原始观察,例如,BOLD反应,嵌套在参与者中,而参与者嵌套在群体中,例如,健康对照。通常,研究忽略了嵌套结构,而单独或总体地分析参与者。这忽略了参与者内部和参与者之间差异的区别,这可能导致结果的普遍性较差,因为群体水平效应不一定反映群体中每个成员的效应,在最坏的情况下,群体水平效应与个人水平效应相反的结果可能是矛盾的(例如,Kievit, Frankenhuis, Waldorp, & Borsboom, 2013; Robinson, 2009; Simpson, 1951)。为了解决这些问题,我们提出了一种多层方法来建模fMRI网络,在个体层面使用高斯图形模型,在群体层面使用居里-魏斯图形模型。仿真结果表明,该方法在边缘检索方面优于单个分析和集合分析。我们将提出的多层次方法应用于724名健康参与者的静息状态fMRI数据,检查他们的共性和个体差异。我们不仅在群体层面恢复了先前发现的七个静息状态网络,而且在个体层面的网络中也观察到相当大的异质性。最后,我们讨论了多层方法的必要性、其他挑战以及未来可能的扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Network Neuroscience
Network Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
68
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书