Trends in Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Funding and Its Relationship to Nursing Home Resident Care.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Katherine A Kennedy, Cyrus Kosar, Madison S Williams, Kali S Thomas
{"title":"Trends in Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Funding and Its Relationship to Nursing Home Resident Care.","authors":"Katherine A Kennedy, Cyrus Kosar, Madison S Williams, Kali S Thomas","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policy Points Funding that states' Long-Term Care Ombudsman Programs (LTCOPs) receive must cover all activities in that state related to the care of all individuals in nursing homes (NHs) and board and care (i.e., residential care communities, assisted living, and similar care homes); over time, duties and demands have expanded without similar increases in funding. States are contributing more to their federally mandated LTCOPs than they have historically. Evidence from this study suggests that increased spending on LTCOPs is associated with improved NH resident care, supporting the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's recent call for increased funding to LTCOPs.</p><p><strong>Context: </strong>Funded partially by the Older Americans Act, state Long-Term Care Ombudsman Programs (LTCOPs) provide a critical role in serving as advocates for older adults in long-term care (LTC) facilities. Ombudsmen regularly visit residents, resolve disputes, and assist with discharge planning. In 2022, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine called for increased LTCOP funding to improve nursing home (NH) quality. However, it is unclear how changes in program funding are associated with the care provided to NH residents. Based on the functions that the LTC Ombudsmen are intended to provide, we hypothesized that increases in LTCOP spending would be associated with improved care in NHs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined 20-year trends in funding for the LTCOP (2000 to 2019). Using 2011-2019 data from the National Ombudsman Reporting System, LTCFocus.org, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Care Compare, and the Area Health Resource File, we examined the relationship between LTCOP spending per LTC bed at the state level and NH outcomes, controlling for year, state, facility, and market characteristics.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Overall, LTCOP funding increased over 20 years. However, the share of federal contributions to the LTCOP has decreased from 58.8% in 2000 to 46.9% of the total program's budget in 2019. The LTCOP spent an average of $37.30 per LTC bed in 2019, with wide state variation. In 2011, the average share of residents receiving antipsychotics was 25.4%, the share of those who were physically restrained was 2.9%, and the share of those with low-care needs was 13.5%. For every $100 annual increase in total spending per bed, there was a statistically significant 1.32, 1.13, and 2.95 percentage-point decrease in the share of residents receiving antipsychotics, those who were physically restrained, and those who with low-care needs, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>States that have increased funding for their LTCOP observe better NH resident care. These findings support calls to increase funding for LTCOPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49810,"journal":{"name":"Milbank Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milbank Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.70061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy Points Funding that states' Long-Term Care Ombudsman Programs (LTCOPs) receive must cover all activities in that state related to the care of all individuals in nursing homes (NHs) and board and care (i.e., residential care communities, assisted living, and similar care homes); over time, duties and demands have expanded without similar increases in funding. States are contributing more to their federally mandated LTCOPs than they have historically. Evidence from this study suggests that increased spending on LTCOPs is associated with improved NH resident care, supporting the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's recent call for increased funding to LTCOPs.

Context: Funded partially by the Older Americans Act, state Long-Term Care Ombudsman Programs (LTCOPs) provide a critical role in serving as advocates for older adults in long-term care (LTC) facilities. Ombudsmen regularly visit residents, resolve disputes, and assist with discharge planning. In 2022, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine called for increased LTCOP funding to improve nursing home (NH) quality. However, it is unclear how changes in program funding are associated with the care provided to NH residents. Based on the functions that the LTC Ombudsmen are intended to provide, we hypothesized that increases in LTCOP spending would be associated with improved care in NHs.

Methods: We examined 20-year trends in funding for the LTCOP (2000 to 2019). Using 2011-2019 data from the National Ombudsman Reporting System, LTCFocus.org, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Care Compare, and the Area Health Resource File, we examined the relationship between LTCOP spending per LTC bed at the state level and NH outcomes, controlling for year, state, facility, and market characteristics.

Findings: Overall, LTCOP funding increased over 20 years. However, the share of federal contributions to the LTCOP has decreased from 58.8% in 2000 to 46.9% of the total program's budget in 2019. The LTCOP spent an average of $37.30 per LTC bed in 2019, with wide state variation. In 2011, the average share of residents receiving antipsychotics was 25.4%, the share of those who were physically restrained was 2.9%, and the share of those with low-care needs was 13.5%. For every $100 annual increase in total spending per bed, there was a statistically significant 1.32, 1.13, and 2.95 percentage-point decrease in the share of residents receiving antipsychotics, those who were physically restrained, and those who with low-care needs, respectively.

Conclusions: States that have increased funding for their LTCOP observe better NH resident care. These findings support calls to increase funding for LTCOPs.

长期照护申诉专员计划经费之趋势及其与养老院住客照护之关系。
政策要点:各州的长期护理监察员计划(ltcop)收到的资金必须涵盖该州与护理之家(NHs)和董事会和护理(即住宿护理社区,辅助生活和类似的护理之家)中所有个人护理相关的所有活动;随着时间的推移,关税和需求在没有类似资金增加的情况下扩大了。各州对联邦授权的长期警务计划的贡献比以往任何时候都要多。来自本研究的证据表明,在ltcop上增加的支出与改善NH居民护理有关,这支持了美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院最近呼吁增加对ltcop的资助。背景:部分由美国老年人法案资助,州长期护理监察员计划(LTCOPs)在长期护理(LTC)设施中为老年人提供倡导方面发挥了关键作用。监察员定期访问居民,解决纠纷,并协助出院计划。2022年,美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院呼吁增加LTCOP资金,以提高养老院(NH)的质量。然而,目前尚不清楚项目资金的变化如何与向NH居民提供的护理相关联。基于LTC监察员打算提供的功能,我们假设LTCOP支出的增加将与NHs护理的改善有关。方法:我们研究了20年来LTCOP的资金趋势(2000年至2019年)。使用2011-2019年来自国家监察员报告系统、LTCFocus.org、医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心护理比较和地区卫生资源文件的数据,我们检查了州一级LTCOP每个LTC床位支出与NH结果之间的关系,控制了年份、州、设施和市场特征。研究结果:总体而言,LTCOP的资金在20年内有所增加。然而,联邦对LTCOP的贡献份额已从2000年的58.8%下降到2019年项目总预算的46.9%。2019年,LTCOP平均每个LTC床位花费37.30美元,各州差异很大。2011年,接受抗精神病药物治疗的平均比例为25.4%,身体约束的平均比例为2.9%,低护理需求的平均比例为13.5%。每张病床每年增加100美元的总支出,接受抗精神病药物治疗的居民、身体受到限制的居民和低护理需求的居民的比例分别下降1.32、1.13和2.95个百分点,这在统计上是显著的。结论:增加LTCOP资金的州观察到更好的NH住院患者护理。这些发现支持了增加ltcop资金的呼吁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Milbank Quarterly
Milbank Quarterly 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Milbank Quarterly is devoted to scholarly analysis of significant issues in health and health care policy. It presents original research, policy analysis, and commentary from academics, clinicians, and policymakers. The in-depth, multidisciplinary approach of the journal permits contributors to explore fully the social origins of health in our society and to examine in detail the implications of different health policies. Topics addressed in The Milbank Quarterly include the impact of social factors on health, prevention, allocation of health care resources, legal and ethical issues in health policy, health and health care administration, and the organization and financing of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信