Artificial intelligence-based approaches for advance care planning: a scoping review.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Umut Arioz, Matthew John Allsop, William D Goodman, Suzanne Timmons, Kseniya Simbirtseva, Izidor Mlakar, Grega Mocnik
{"title":"Artificial intelligence-based approaches for advance care planning: a scoping review.","authors":"Umut Arioz, Matthew John Allsop, William D Goodman, Suzanne Timmons, Kseniya Simbirtseva, Izidor Mlakar, Grega Mocnik","doi":"10.1186/s12904-025-01827-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advance Care Planning (ACP) empowers individuals to make informed decisions about their future healthcare. However, barriers including time constraints and a lack of clarity on professional responsibilities for ACP hinder its implementation. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) could potentially optimise elements of ACP in practice by, for example, identifying patients for whom ACP may be relevant and aiding ACP-related decision-making. However, it is unclear how applications of AI for ACP are currently being used in the delivery of palliative care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the use of AI models for ACP, identifying key features that influence model performance, transparency of data used, source code availability, and generalizability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Electronic databases (Scopus and Web of Science (WoS)) and seven preprint servers were searched to identify published research articles and conference papers in English, German and French for the last 10 years' records. Our search strategy was based on terms for ACP and artificial intelligence models (including machine learning). The GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included studies (N = 41) predominantly used retrospective cohort designs and real-world electronic health record data. Most studies (n = 39) focused on identifying individuals who might benefit from ACP, while fewer studies addressed initiating ACP discussions (n = 10) or documenting and sharing ACP information (n = 8). Among AI and machine learning models, logistic regression was the most frequent analytical method (n = 15). Most models (n = 28) demonstrated good to very good performance. However, concerns remain regarding data and code availability, as many studies lacked transparency and reproducibility (n = 17 and n = 36, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most studies report models with promising results for predicting patient outcomes and supporting decision-making, but significant challenges remain, particularly regarding data and code availability. Future research should prioritize transparency and open-source code to facilitate rigorous evaluation. There is scope to explore novel AI-based approaches to ACP, including to support processes surrounding the review and updating of ACP information.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01827-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advance Care Planning (ACP) empowers individuals to make informed decisions about their future healthcare. However, barriers including time constraints and a lack of clarity on professional responsibilities for ACP hinder its implementation. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) could potentially optimise elements of ACP in practice by, for example, identifying patients for whom ACP may be relevant and aiding ACP-related decision-making. However, it is unclear how applications of AI for ACP are currently being used in the delivery of palliative care.

Objectives: To explore the use of AI models for ACP, identifying key features that influence model performance, transparency of data used, source code availability, and generalizability.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Electronic databases (Scopus and Web of Science (WoS)) and seven preprint servers were searched to identify published research articles and conference papers in English, German and French for the last 10 years' records. Our search strategy was based on terms for ACP and artificial intelligence models (including machine learning). The GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of included studies.

Results: Included studies (N = 41) predominantly used retrospective cohort designs and real-world electronic health record data. Most studies (n = 39) focused on identifying individuals who might benefit from ACP, while fewer studies addressed initiating ACP discussions (n = 10) or documenting and sharing ACP information (n = 8). Among AI and machine learning models, logistic regression was the most frequent analytical method (n = 15). Most models (n = 28) demonstrated good to very good performance. However, concerns remain regarding data and code availability, as many studies lacked transparency and reproducibility (n = 17 and n = 36, respectively).

Conclusion: Most studies report models with promising results for predicting patient outcomes and supporting decision-making, but significant challenges remain, particularly regarding data and code availability. Future research should prioritize transparency and open-source code to facilitate rigorous evaluation. There is scope to explore novel AI-based approaches to ACP, including to support processes surrounding the review and updating of ACP information.

基于人工智能的预先护理计划方法:范围审查。
背景:预先护理计划(ACP)使个人能够对他们未来的医疗保健做出明智的决定。然而,包括时间限制和非加太专业责任不明确在内的障碍阻碍了其实施。人工智能(AI)的应用可能会在实践中优化ACP的要素,例如,通过识别可能与ACP相关的患者并协助ACP相关的决策。然而,目前尚不清楚人工智能在ACP中的应用如何用于姑息治疗的提供。目的:探索人工智能模型在ACP中的应用,确定影响模型性能、所用数据透明度、源代码可用性和通用性的关键特征。方法:采用Arksey和O'Malley框架和PRISMA-ScR指南进行范围审查。检索电子数据库(Scopus和Web of Science (WoS))和7个预印本服务器,以确定最近10Â年记录的已发表的英语、德语和法语研究论文和会议论文。我们的搜索策略基于ACP和人工智能模型(包括机器学习)的术语。GRADE方法用于评估纳入研究的质量。结果:纳入的研究(N = 41)主要采用回顾性队列设计和真实世界的电子健康记录数据。大多数研究(n = 39)侧重于识别可能从ACP中受益的个体,而较少的研究涉及启动ACP讨论(n = 10)或记录和共享ACP信息(n = 8)。在人工智能和机器学习模型中,逻辑回归是最常用的分析方法(n = 15)。大多数模型(n = 28)表现出良好到非常好的性能。然而,由于许多研究缺乏透明度和可重复性(分别为n = 17和n = 36),数据和代码可用性方面的担忧仍然存在。结论:大多数研究报告的模型在预测患者预后和支持决策方面具有良好的结果,但仍然存在重大挑战,特别是在数据和代码可用性方面。未来的研究应该优先考虑透明度和开源代码,以促进严格的评估。探索新的基于人工智能的ACP方法还有空间,包括支持围绕ACP信息的审查和更新的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信