{"title":"Predictive factors for inter-agency partnership success","authors":"Nicola Drago , Tullio Vardanega","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Building partnerships among development cooperation agencies strengthens their collective capacity. However, 2 partnerships out of 10 fail to achieve their intended objectives. Ex-ante evaluation of future partnerships should help attain a higher rate of success. To do this, agencies need a better understanding of the factors behind successful or unsuccessful partnerships. This paper draws from the first stage of a research project aimed at systematically identifying and classifying such factors by importance in a semi-automated manner, to streamline partnership planning and evaluation tasks. The principal result we report here is a dataset containing 750 factors of influence, visualized along three axes: operations and country context, governance and management, and project quality, and grouped into ten clusters. Evaluators and planners can readily use the factors and complete method to focus multi-stakeholder discussions and information gathering, as well as to learn to use Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning approaches on project design and evaluation document corpora. Future research can overcome the limitations of the method by standardizing the factor set through ontological and taxonomic work, as well as incorporating automated context and behavioral analyses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102719"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001867","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Building partnerships among development cooperation agencies strengthens their collective capacity. However, 2 partnerships out of 10 fail to achieve their intended objectives. Ex-ante evaluation of future partnerships should help attain a higher rate of success. To do this, agencies need a better understanding of the factors behind successful or unsuccessful partnerships. This paper draws from the first stage of a research project aimed at systematically identifying and classifying such factors by importance in a semi-automated manner, to streamline partnership planning and evaluation tasks. The principal result we report here is a dataset containing 750 factors of influence, visualized along three axes: operations and country context, governance and management, and project quality, and grouped into ten clusters. Evaluators and planners can readily use the factors and complete method to focus multi-stakeholder discussions and information gathering, as well as to learn to use Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning approaches on project design and evaluation document corpora. Future research can overcome the limitations of the method by standardizing the factor set through ontological and taxonomic work, as well as incorporating automated context and behavioral analyses.
期刊介绍:
Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.