A qualitative study on healthcare providers' biases towards transgender and gender diverse people accessing contraceptive care.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yasaman Zia, Connie Folse, Adrien Lawyer, Felix Zeid, Alejandra Alvarez, Erica Somerson, Kathryn Albergate Davis, Dane Menkin, Mitzi Hawkins, Jen Hastings, Cynthia Harper
{"title":"A qualitative study on healthcare providers' biases towards transgender and gender diverse people accessing contraceptive care.","authors":"Yasaman Zia, Connie Folse, Adrien Lawyer, Felix Zeid, Alejandra Alvarez, Erica Somerson, Kathryn Albergate Davis, Dane Menkin, Mitzi Hawkins, Jen Hastings, Cynthia Harper","doi":"10.1080/26410397.2025.2577002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bias in sexual and reproductive health care (SRH) undermines the quality and delivery of essential services. For transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients, barriers to care may be acute when seeking gendered services, such as contraception. Few studies have assessed providers' perceptions of TGD patients in SRH. Our objective was to examine bias in contraceptive providers' attitudes towards and experiences with TGD patients. We conducted in-depth interviews, from August 2022 to August 2024, with 41 healthcare providers located throughout the US and attending CME-accredited trainings on contraceptive counselling. We utilised deductive thematic analysis to identify the domains of implicit and explicit bias specific to TGD patients. Many providers struggled to understand gender diversity and had difficulty using gender-inclusive frameworks in care delivery. Explicit biases were exemplified in the pervasiveness of gender binarism within the healthcare system and providers' lack of experience with TGD patients. Providers demonstrated implicit biases through their deficits in knowledge regarding TGD patients' medical needs and culturally insensitive approaches. They offered suggestions to mitigate bias, including institutional changes to make clinics more trans-inclusive and affirming. Biases and disparities specific to TGD patients are perpetuated through a lack of awareness and stigmatisation in healthcare settings. Our findings highlight areas to improve awareness of bias, dispel confusion with evidence on gender-inclusive care, and integrate structural changes within clinics to reduce the burdensome impacts of bias on TGD patients. Advocacy at both the provider and institutional levels is needed to offer quality contraceptive care for TGD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":37074,"journal":{"name":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","volume":" ","pages":"2577002"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12624886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2025.2577002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bias in sexual and reproductive health care (SRH) undermines the quality and delivery of essential services. For transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients, barriers to care may be acute when seeking gendered services, such as contraception. Few studies have assessed providers' perceptions of TGD patients in SRH. Our objective was to examine bias in contraceptive providers' attitudes towards and experiences with TGD patients. We conducted in-depth interviews, from August 2022 to August 2024, with 41 healthcare providers located throughout the US and attending CME-accredited trainings on contraceptive counselling. We utilised deductive thematic analysis to identify the domains of implicit and explicit bias specific to TGD patients. Many providers struggled to understand gender diversity and had difficulty using gender-inclusive frameworks in care delivery. Explicit biases were exemplified in the pervasiveness of gender binarism within the healthcare system and providers' lack of experience with TGD patients. Providers demonstrated implicit biases through their deficits in knowledge regarding TGD patients' medical needs and culturally insensitive approaches. They offered suggestions to mitigate bias, including institutional changes to make clinics more trans-inclusive and affirming. Biases and disparities specific to TGD patients are perpetuated through a lack of awareness and stigmatisation in healthcare settings. Our findings highlight areas to improve awareness of bias, dispel confusion with evidence on gender-inclusive care, and integrate structural changes within clinics to reduce the burdensome impacts of bias on TGD patients. Advocacy at both the provider and institutional levels is needed to offer quality contraceptive care for TGD patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

卫生保健提供者对跨性别和性别多样化的人获得避孕护理的偏见的定性研究。
性保健和生殖保健方面的偏见破坏了基本服务的质量和提供。对于跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)患者,在寻求性别服务(如避孕)时,护理障碍可能很严重。很少有研究评估提供者对SRH中TGD患者的看法。我们的目的是检查避孕提供者对TGD患者的态度和经验的偏见。从2022年8月至2024年8月,我们对美国各地的41名医疗保健提供者进行了深入访谈,并参加了cme认可的避孕咨询培训。我们利用演绎主题分析来确定TGD患者特定的内隐和外显偏见领域。许多提供者难以理解性别多样性,难以在护理服务中使用性别包容性框架。明确的偏见体现在医疗保健系统中普遍存在的性别二元主义和提供者缺乏TGD患者的经验。提供者通过他们在TGD患者医疗需求和文化不敏感方法方面的知识缺陷表现出隐性偏见。他们提出了减轻偏见的建议,包括进行制度改革,使诊所更加包容和肯定跨性别者。由于在卫生保健环境中缺乏认识和污名化,对TGD患者特有的偏见和差异一直存在。我们的研究结果强调了提高对偏见的认识,消除对性别包容性护理证据的混淆,以及在诊所内整合结构变化以减少偏见对TGD患者的沉重影响的领域。需要在提供者和机构层面进行宣传,为TGD患者提供高质量的避孕护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: SRHM is a multidisciplinary journal, welcoming submissions from a wide range of disciplines, including the social sciences and humanities, behavioural science, public health, human rights and law. The journal welcomes a range of methodological approaches, including qualitative and quantitative analyses such as policy analysis; mixed methods approaches to public health and health systems research; economic, political and historical analysis; and epidemiological work with a focus on SRHR. Key topics addressed in SRHM include (but are not limited to) abortion, family planning, contraception, female genital mutilation, HIV and other STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV), maternal health, SRHR in humanitarian settings, gender-based and other forms of interpersonal violence, young people, gender, sexuality, sexual rights and sexual pleasure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书