Kevin Connors, Ian Bussey, Andrew Broda, Genevieve Chartrand, Paul Kim, Igor Belyansky
{"title":"To close or not to close: morphologic changes associated with closure of the posterior rectus sheath after posterior component separation.","authors":"Kevin Connors, Ian Bussey, Andrew Broda, Genevieve Chartrand, Paul Kim, Igor Belyansky","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12208-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to evaluate morphologic changes of the rectus muscles after closure of the posterior rectus sheath (PRS) following component separation. There is no consensus on whether to close the PRS, and limited data exists on how closure affects the morphology and potential function of the abdominal wall musculature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of all patients between 1/1/2016 and 12/31/2022 who underwent PRS release for ventral hernia repair performed by a single surgeon. During this period, some patients had reconstitution of the PRS while others had the posterior layer buttressed with peritoneum. Subjects were included if preoperative and postoperative cross-sectional imaging was available for review and excluded with: transversus abdominis muscle release, external oblique muscle release, open surgery, or complication of hematoma or seroma. Measurements of rectus muscle width and distance between semilunar lines were obtained at the level of the umbilicus, upper, middle, and lower abdomen. Statistical analysis performed using Student's t-test analysis on continuous variables. Significance defined as p = .050.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results include 90 patients divided into two arms: PRS buttressed versus PRS closed. Closed PRS was associated with significantly decreased percent difference in distance between semilunar lines in the middle (4% vs -5%, p = .001), umbilical (2% vs -4%, p = .031), and lower abdomen (2% vs -3%, p = .018) and rectus muscle width in the middle (Right: 20% vs 11%, p = .009; Left: 20% vs 6%, p ≤ .001), umbilical (Right: 20% vs 9%, p = .001; Left: 21% vs 10%, p = .002), and lower abdomen (Right: 8% vs 0%, p = .006; Left: 8% vs -1%, p = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Release and decoupling of PRS results in increased width of rectus abdominis muscle in both cohorts although significantly larger change observed in PRS bridged. Reloading of the PRS brings the semilunar lines closer together as compared to preop measurements, the opposite is observed when leaving the PRS bridged with peritoneum.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12208-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to evaluate morphologic changes of the rectus muscles after closure of the posterior rectus sheath (PRS) following component separation. There is no consensus on whether to close the PRS, and limited data exists on how closure affects the morphology and potential function of the abdominal wall musculature.
Methods: Retrospective review of all patients between 1/1/2016 and 12/31/2022 who underwent PRS release for ventral hernia repair performed by a single surgeon. During this period, some patients had reconstitution of the PRS while others had the posterior layer buttressed with peritoneum. Subjects were included if preoperative and postoperative cross-sectional imaging was available for review and excluded with: transversus abdominis muscle release, external oblique muscle release, open surgery, or complication of hematoma or seroma. Measurements of rectus muscle width and distance between semilunar lines were obtained at the level of the umbilicus, upper, middle, and lower abdomen. Statistical analysis performed using Student's t-test analysis on continuous variables. Significance defined as p = .050.
Results: Results include 90 patients divided into two arms: PRS buttressed versus PRS closed. Closed PRS was associated with significantly decreased percent difference in distance between semilunar lines in the middle (4% vs -5%, p = .001), umbilical (2% vs -4%, p = .031), and lower abdomen (2% vs -3%, p = .018) and rectus muscle width in the middle (Right: 20% vs 11%, p = .009; Left: 20% vs 6%, p ≤ .001), umbilical (Right: 20% vs 9%, p = .001; Left: 21% vs 10%, p = .002), and lower abdomen (Right: 8% vs 0%, p = .006; Left: 8% vs -1%, p = .006).
Conclusions: Release and decoupling of PRS results in increased width of rectus abdominis muscle in both cohorts although significantly larger change observed in PRS bridged. Reloading of the PRS brings the semilunar lines closer together as compared to preop measurements, the opposite is observed when leaving the PRS bridged with peritoneum.
简介:本研究旨在评估后直肌鞘(PRS)关闭后部件分离后直肌的形态学变化。关于是否关闭PRS尚无共识,并且关于关闭如何影响腹壁肌肉组织的形态和潜在功能的数据有限。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间由同一位外科医生行PRS松解术进行腹疝修补的所有患者。在此期间,一些患者重建了PRS,而另一些患者则用腹膜支撑后层。如果术前和术后有可用的横断面成像,则纳入受试者,并排除:腹横肌释放、外斜肌释放、开放手术或血肿或血肿并发症。在脐、上、中、下腹部测量直肌宽度和半月线之间的距离。统计分析采用学生t检验对连续变量进行分析。显著性定义为p = 0.050。结果:90例患者分为两组:PRS支撑组和PRS闭合组。闭合PRS与中间半月线之间距离差异的百分比显著降低相关(4% vs -5%, p =。001),脐带(2% vs -4%, p =。031)和下腹部(2% vs -3%, p =。018)和中间的直肌宽度(右:20% vs 11%, p = 0.009;左:20% vs 6%, p≤。001),脐带(右:20% vs 9%, p = .001;左:21% vs . 10%, p = .001)。002)和下腹部(右:8% vs 0%, p = 0.006;左:8% vs -1%, p = 0.006)。结论:PRS的释放和解耦导致两组的腹直肌宽度增加,尽管在PRS桥中观察到明显更大的变化。与术前测量相比,重新加载PRS使半月线更靠近,当PRS与腹膜桥接时观察到相反的情况。
期刊介绍:
Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research.
Topics covered in the journal include:
-Surgical aspects of:
Interventional endoscopy,
Ultrasound,
Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology,
-Gastroenterologic surgery
-Thoracic surgery
-Traumatic surgery
-Orthopedic surgery
-Pediatric surgery