Comparative Evaluation of Wavelength-Dependent Photodynamic Therapy Efficacy Using Representative Red and Near-Infrared Photosensitizers in a Single Tumor Model.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-23 DOI:10.1177/15330338251390292
Winn Aung, Atsushi B Tsuji, Zhao-Hui Jin, Aya Sugyo, Chie Kajiwara, Tatsuya Higashi
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Wavelength-Dependent Photodynamic Therapy Efficacy Using Representative Red and Near-Infrared Photosensitizers in a Single Tumor Model.","authors":"Winn Aung, Atsushi B Tsuji, Zhao-Hui Jin, Aya Sugyo, Chie Kajiwara, Tatsuya Higashi","doi":"10.1177/15330338251390292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThis study aims to investigate and fairly compare the oncological therapeutic efficacy of red photodynamic therapy (Red-PDT) and near-infrared photodynamic therapy (NIR-PDT), to support the selection of suitable photosensitizers (PSs) for optimal PDT.MethodsTwo different representative PSs, trastuzumab-HiLyte Fluor™ 647 conjugate (Tra-HLF647) and trastuzumab-Indocyanine Green conjugate (Tra-ICG), activated by two laser systems at 635 nm and 808 nm, respectively, were used. To ensure a fair comparison, we used the same A4 cell line/tumor model expressing the same target, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), and employed the same delivery approach. To comprehensively evaluate and compare the potential effects of Tra-HLF647-mediated Red-PDT and Tra-ICG-mediated NIR-PDT, we conducted cell viability imaging assays, intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation measurements, longitudinal monitoring of tumor volume changes, histological and immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses of tumor sections, and measurements of tumor necrotic depth.ResultsBoth PDTs exerted similar rapid cell death in cell viability imaging assays. There was no significant difference in ROS generation between cells subjected to Red-PDT and NIR-PDT. Both PDTs caused a statistically significant tumor growth delay compared to the control groups; however, no significant difference was detected between the Red-PDT and NIR-PDT groups. The H&E-stained sections of tumors that received Red-PDT and NIR-PDT showed a similar pattern of necrosis-associated features. No conspicuous tissue damage was observed in the control groups. The depth of necrosis, estimated via the coincided accumulation of a fluorescent necrosis marker (AF546-pHLIP) and utilized as an indirect index to approximate laser light penetration, was also nearly identical between tumors treated with Red-PDT and NIR-PDT.ConclusionsTarget-specific Red-PDT and NIR-PDT, using their respective PSs, demonstrated equivalent therapeutic efficacy in tumor models. These findings suggest that wavelength differences between Red-PS and NIR-PS may not critically impact treatment outcomes, offering flexibility in fluorophore selection for future PS conjugate design.</p>","PeriodicalId":22203,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","volume":"24 ","pages":"15330338251390292"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338251390292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThis study aims to investigate and fairly compare the oncological therapeutic efficacy of red photodynamic therapy (Red-PDT) and near-infrared photodynamic therapy (NIR-PDT), to support the selection of suitable photosensitizers (PSs) for optimal PDT.MethodsTwo different representative PSs, trastuzumab-HiLyte Fluor™ 647 conjugate (Tra-HLF647) and trastuzumab-Indocyanine Green conjugate (Tra-ICG), activated by two laser systems at 635 nm and 808 nm, respectively, were used. To ensure a fair comparison, we used the same A4 cell line/tumor model expressing the same target, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), and employed the same delivery approach. To comprehensively evaluate and compare the potential effects of Tra-HLF647-mediated Red-PDT and Tra-ICG-mediated NIR-PDT, we conducted cell viability imaging assays, intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation measurements, longitudinal monitoring of tumor volume changes, histological and immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses of tumor sections, and measurements of tumor necrotic depth.ResultsBoth PDTs exerted similar rapid cell death in cell viability imaging assays. There was no significant difference in ROS generation between cells subjected to Red-PDT and NIR-PDT. Both PDTs caused a statistically significant tumor growth delay compared to the control groups; however, no significant difference was detected between the Red-PDT and NIR-PDT groups. The H&E-stained sections of tumors that received Red-PDT and NIR-PDT showed a similar pattern of necrosis-associated features. No conspicuous tissue damage was observed in the control groups. The depth of necrosis, estimated via the coincided accumulation of a fluorescent necrosis marker (AF546-pHLIP) and utilized as an indirect index to approximate laser light penetration, was also nearly identical between tumors treated with Red-PDT and NIR-PDT.ConclusionsTarget-specific Red-PDT and NIR-PDT, using their respective PSs, demonstrated equivalent therapeutic efficacy in tumor models. These findings suggest that wavelength differences between Red-PS and NIR-PS may not critically impact treatment outcomes, offering flexibility in fluorophore selection for future PS conjugate design.

在单一肿瘤模型中使用代表性红光和近红外光敏剂的波长依赖性光动力治疗效果的比较评价。
本研究旨在探讨并公平比较红光光动力治疗(red -PDT)和近红外光动力治疗(NIR-PDT)的肿瘤治疗效果,以支持选择合适的光敏剂(ps)进行最佳的PDT。方法采用曲妥珠单抗- hilyte Fluor™647偶联物(Tra-HLF647)和曲妥珠单抗-吲哚菁绿偶联物(Tra-ICG)两种不同的代表性ps,分别在635 nm和808 nm两种激光系统下激活。为了确保公平的比较,我们使用相同的A4细胞系/肿瘤模型表达相同的靶点,人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER-2),并采用相同的递送方法。为了全面评估和比较tra - hlf647介导的Red-PDT和tra - icg介导的NIR-PDT的潜在影响,我们进行了细胞活力成像分析、细胞内活性氧(ROS)生成测量、肿瘤体积变化的纵向监测、肿瘤切片的组织学和免疫组化(IHC)分析以及肿瘤坏死深度测量。结果两种pdt在细胞活力成像检测中表现出相似的细胞快速死亡。经Red-PDT和NIR-PDT处理的细胞ROS生成无显著差异。与对照组相比,两组pdt均导致肿瘤生长延迟,具有统计学意义;然而,在Red-PDT组和NIR-PDT组之间没有发现显著差异。接受Red-PDT和NIR-PDT的肿瘤的h&e染色切片显示出类似的坏死相关特征。对照组未见明显组织损伤。坏死深度,通过荧光坏死标记物(AF546-pHLIP)的一致积累来估计,并用作近似激光穿透的间接指标,在Red-PDT和NIR-PDT治疗的肿瘤之间几乎相同。结论target -specific Red-PDT和NIR-PDT使用各自的PSs在肿瘤模型中表现出相当的治疗效果。这些发现表明,Red-PS和NIR-PS之间的波长差异可能不会严重影响治疗结果,这为未来PS共轭设计的荧光团选择提供了灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (TCRT) is a JCR-ranked, broad-spectrum, open access, peer-reviewed publication whose aim is to provide researchers and clinicians with a platform to share and discuss developments in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信