Operational key points of super-low placement of an intestinal decompression tube and its clinical efficacy in elderly patients with incomplete small bowel obstruction.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Cai-Qin Lin, Ling-Li Pan, Yu Cheng, Sun-Jian Wang, Ju-Li Lin
{"title":"Operational key points of super-low placement of an intestinal decompression tube and its clinical efficacy in elderly patients with incomplete small bowel obstruction.","authors":"Cai-Qin Lin, Ling-Li Pan, Yu Cheng, Sun-Jian Wang, Ju-Li Lin","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12322-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarize the key operational points for super-low placement of intestinal decompression tubes and compare the short-term outcomes between super-low placement and traditional placement in elderly patients with incomplete small bowel obstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-eight elderly patients (aged ≥ 60 years) with incomplete small bowel obstruction following abdominal surgery admitted to Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between January 2014 and December 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. The super-low group comprised 55 patients treated with the super-low placement of an intestinal decompression tube. The traditional group comprised 23 patients treated with the traditional placement of intestinal decompression tubes. Short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The key operational points for super-low placement of the intestinal decompression tube involve three steps: (1) simultaneous insertion of the catheter and guidewire through the cardia; (2) advancement of the guidewire as deeply as possible; and (3) advancement of the catheter over the guidewire. No significant differences were observed in the baseline clinical characteristics between the two groups. The conservative treatment success rate was significantly greater in the super-low group than in the traditional group (89.1% vs. 69.6%, P = 0.035). The postplacement hospital stay was significantly shorter in the super-low group (7.8 ± 4.0 days vs. 16.1 ± 10.6 days, P < 0.001). Compared with the traditional group, the super-low group also demonstrated significantly shorter times to abdominal symptom relief (2.7 ± 2.3 days vs. 5.4 ± 5.0 days, P < 0.001) and time to resumption of flatus/defecation (4.6 ± 3.3 days vs. 8.1 ± 5.3 days, P = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three key operational points for the super-low placement of intestinal decompression tubes were identified to facilitate learning and dissemination. Super-low placement improved the success rate of conservative treatment and reduced the length of hospital stay in elderly patients with incomplete small bowel obstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12322-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To summarize the key operational points for super-low placement of intestinal decompression tubes and compare the short-term outcomes between super-low placement and traditional placement in elderly patients with incomplete small bowel obstruction.

Methods: Seventy-eight elderly patients (aged ≥ 60 years) with incomplete small bowel obstruction following abdominal surgery admitted to Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between January 2014 and December 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. The super-low group comprised 55 patients treated with the super-low placement of an intestinal decompression tube. The traditional group comprised 23 patients treated with the traditional placement of intestinal decompression tubes. Short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results: The key operational points for super-low placement of the intestinal decompression tube involve three steps: (1) simultaneous insertion of the catheter and guidewire through the cardia; (2) advancement of the guidewire as deeply as possible; and (3) advancement of the catheter over the guidewire. No significant differences were observed in the baseline clinical characteristics between the two groups. The conservative treatment success rate was significantly greater in the super-low group than in the traditional group (89.1% vs. 69.6%, P = 0.035). The postplacement hospital stay was significantly shorter in the super-low group (7.8 ± 4.0 days vs. 16.1 ± 10.6 days, P < 0.001). Compared with the traditional group, the super-low group also demonstrated significantly shorter times to abdominal symptom relief (2.7 ± 2.3 days vs. 5.4 ± 5.0 days, P < 0.001) and time to resumption of flatus/defecation (4.6 ± 3.3 days vs. 8.1 ± 5.3 days, P = 0.005).

Conclusion: Three key operational points for the super-low placement of intestinal decompression tubes were identified to facilitate learning and dissemination. Super-low placement improved the success rate of conservative treatment and reduced the length of hospital stay in elderly patients with incomplete small bowel obstruction.

老年不完全性小肠梗阻患者超低置肠减压管的操作要点及临床疗效。
目的:总结高龄不完全性小肠梗阻患者超低放置肠减压管的操作要点,并比较超低放置与传统放置的近期疗效。方法:回顾性分析2014年1月至2024年12月福建医科大学协和医院收治的78例腹部手术后不完全性小肠梗阻老年患者(年龄≥60岁)。超低位组55例患者接受超低位肠减压管治疗。传统组23例患者采用传统肠减压管置入治疗。比较两组患者的短期疗效。结果:超低置肠减压管的操作要点包括三个步骤:(1)导管与导丝经心同时插入;(2)导丝尽可能深入推进;(3)导管在导丝上推进。两组患者的基线临床特征无显著差异。超低组保守治疗成功率显著高于传统组(89.1%比69.6%,P = 0.035)。超低位组患者放置后住院时间明显缩短(7.8±4.0天),差异有统计学意义(16.1±10.6天)。结论:明确了超低位肠减压管放置的三个操作要点,便于学习和推广。超低置位提高了老年不完全性小肠梗阻患者保守治疗的成功率,缩短了住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信