A modified double tract reconstruction with the NI method following proximal gastrectomy: a novel approach to prevent reflux and preserve nutritional status.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Toshikatsu Tsuji, Noriyuki Inaki, Shinichi Kadoya, Jun Kinoshita, Hideki Moriyama, Daisuke Yamamoto, Hiroto Saito, Ryota Matsui, Saki Hayashi, Kengo Hayashi, Yusuke Sakimura, Kenta Doden, Hiroshi Saito
{"title":"A modified double tract reconstruction with the NI method following proximal gastrectomy: a novel approach to prevent reflux and preserve nutritional status.","authors":"Toshikatsu Tsuji, Noriyuki Inaki, Shinichi Kadoya, Jun Kinoshita, Hideki Moriyama, Daisuke Yamamoto, Hiroto Saito, Ryota Matsui, Saki Hayashi, Kengo Hayashi, Yusuke Sakimura, Kenta Doden, Hiroshi Saito","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12287-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Double-tract reconstruction is commonly performed after proximal gastrectomy to prevent gastroesophageal reflux and ensure adequate nutrition. We developed a modified double-tract reconstruction intervention, denominated the NI method, in which the anastomosis between the remnant stomach and jejunum was strategically configured to optimize food passage and suppress gastroesophageal reflux.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with upper-third gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction who underwent proximal gastrectomy with either conventional or NI-modified double-tract reconstruction at two institutions. Postoperative outcomes, including body weight loss and incidence of reflux esophagitis, were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 115 patients underwent proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction, including 35 with the NI method and 110 using the conventional method. No significant differences were observed in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The incidence of reflux esophagitis was significantly lower in the NI group (0% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.032). Although not statistically significant, the NI group showed consistently lower weight loss rates, with approximately 2% less reduction at both 6 and 12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NI-modified double-tract reconstruction is a safe and function-preserving technique for proximal gastrectomy. The unique gastrojejunostomy design may contribute to reduce reflux and achieve better nutritional outcomes by restoring more physiological food passage.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12287-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Double-tract reconstruction is commonly performed after proximal gastrectomy to prevent gastroesophageal reflux and ensure adequate nutrition. We developed a modified double-tract reconstruction intervention, denominated the NI method, in which the anastomosis between the remnant stomach and jejunum was strategically configured to optimize food passage and suppress gastroesophageal reflux.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with upper-third gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction who underwent proximal gastrectomy with either conventional or NI-modified double-tract reconstruction at two institutions. Postoperative outcomes, including body weight loss and incidence of reflux esophagitis, were compared.

Results: In total, 115 patients underwent proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction, including 35 with the NI method and 110 using the conventional method. No significant differences were observed in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The incidence of reflux esophagitis was significantly lower in the NI group (0% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.032). Although not statistically significant, the NI group showed consistently lower weight loss rates, with approximately 2% less reduction at both 6 and 12 months after surgery.

Conclusions: The NI-modified double-tract reconstruction is a safe and function-preserving technique for proximal gastrectomy. The unique gastrojejunostomy design may contribute to reduce reflux and achieve better nutritional outcomes by restoring more physiological food passage.

近端胃切除术后改良双胃道重建的NI方法:一种防止反流和保持营养状态的新方法。
背景:为了防止胃食管反流和保证足够的营养,常在胃近端切除术后进行双道重建。我们开发了一种改良的双道重建干预,称为NI方法,其中残胃和空肠之间的吻合被策略性地配置以优化食物通道并抑制胃食管反流。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了在两家机构接受近端胃切除术并采用传统或ni改良双道重建的上三分之一胃癌和食管胃交界处腺癌患者。比较术后结果,包括体重减轻和反流性食管炎的发生率。结果:115例患者行胃近端切除双道重建,其中NI法35例,常规法110例。两组患者的基线特征无显著差异。NI组反流性食管炎的发生率显著降低(0% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.032)。虽然没有统计学意义,但NI组的减重率一直较低,手术后6个月和12个月的减重率均约为2%。结论:ni改良双束重建是一种安全、功能保留的胃近端切除术技术。独特的胃空肠造口设计可能有助于减少反流,并通过恢复更多的生理食物通道获得更好的营养结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信