Development of a digital tool for semi-quantitative assessment of pesticide exposure risk in greenhouses

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-21 DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105975
Pablo Fernández del Olmo, Julián Sánchez-Hermosilla, Ángel Callejón-Ferre, Marta Gómez-Galán, José Pérez-Alonso
{"title":"Development of a digital tool for semi-quantitative assessment of pesticide exposure risk in greenhouses","authors":"Pablo Fernández del Olmo,&nbsp;Julián Sánchez-Hermosilla,&nbsp;Ángel Callejón-Ferre,&nbsp;Marta Gómez-Galán,&nbsp;José Pérez-Alonso","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate assessment of occupational exposure to plant protection products in greenhouses poses specific challenges due to confined environments, operator variability, and the limited suitability of existing models under real working conditions. This study presents the development of a digital tool that implements a semi-quantitative model for evaluating pesticide exposure risk among greenhouse workers. The model integrates task-specific variables across four exposure scenarios: mixing and loading, application, maintenance and re-entry; and applies a logarithmic scoring system to calculate an exposure index. This index is then combined with a toxicity score derived from product hazard classifications to obtain a comprehensive risk level, interpreted using a five-tier classification scheme with corresponding preventive recommendations. The application includes a preliminary questionnaire to ensure basic safety conditions are met and incorporates an automated update mechanism that maintains an up-to-date list of authorized products based on official registries. The tool was developed with a focus on usability and structured logic, supporting efficient data entry and interpretability of results. Field testing was carried out in different greenhouses under commercial production located in southeast Spain, confirming the coherence and functionality of the tool under practical conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 105975"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025002077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate assessment of occupational exposure to plant protection products in greenhouses poses specific challenges due to confined environments, operator variability, and the limited suitability of existing models under real working conditions. This study presents the development of a digital tool that implements a semi-quantitative model for evaluating pesticide exposure risk among greenhouse workers. The model integrates task-specific variables across four exposure scenarios: mixing and loading, application, maintenance and re-entry; and applies a logarithmic scoring system to calculate an exposure index. This index is then combined with a toxicity score derived from product hazard classifications to obtain a comprehensive risk level, interpreted using a five-tier classification scheme with corresponding preventive recommendations. The application includes a preliminary questionnaire to ensure basic safety conditions are met and incorporates an automated update mechanism that maintains an up-to-date list of authorized products based on official registries. The tool was developed with a focus on usability and structured logic, supporting efficient data entry and interpretability of results. Field testing was carried out in different greenhouses under commercial production located in southeast Spain, confirming the coherence and functionality of the tool under practical conditions.

Abstract Image

开发用于温室农药暴露风险半定量评估的数字工具。
由于环境的限制、操作人员的可变性以及现有模型在实际工作条件下的有限适用性,对温室植物保护产品职业暴露的准确评估提出了具体的挑战。本研究提出了一种数字工具的开发,该工具实现了评估温室工人农药暴露风险的半定量模型。该模型集成了四种暴露场景中的特定任务变量:混合和加载、应用程序、维护和重新进入;并应用对数评分系统来计算暴露指数。然后将该指数与从产品危害分类中得出的毒性评分相结合,以获得综合风险水平,使用具有相应预防建议的五层分类方案进行解释。该申请包括一份初步调查问卷,以确保满足基本的安全条件,并包含一个自动更新机制,根据官方注册表维护最新的授权产品清单。该工具的开发重点是可用性和结构化逻辑,支持有效的数据输入和结果的可解释性。在西班牙东南部的不同温室进行了现场测试,验证了该工具在实际条件下的一致性和功能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书