Evidence-informed propositions for a whole-of-program assessment approach.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrition & Dietetics Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-24 DOI:10.1111/1747-0080.70043
Janica Jamieson, Rachel Bacon, Andrea Bramley, Janeane Dart, Simone Gibson, Gemma Jenkins, Meredith Kennedy, Sue Kleve, Claire Palermo
{"title":"Evidence-informed propositions for a whole-of-program assessment approach.","authors":"Janica Jamieson, Rachel Bacon, Andrea Bramley, Janeane Dart, Simone Gibson, Gemma Jenkins, Meredith Kennedy, Sue Kleve, Claire Palermo","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop evidence-informed propositions for implementing whole-of-program assessment across dietetic education settings, in response to emerging education theory, technological advances such as generative artificial intelligence, and the need for meaningful learning and trustworthy progression decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A four-stage multiple methods study, grounded in pragmatism, was conducted. Initial propositions were developed through a systematic scoping review of programmatic assessment literature. Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns, which were iteratively refined into themes and then preliminary propositions. These were further refined through workshops with dietetic educators, who provided feedback based on their expertise. A repeated systematic scoping review incorporated recent research to ensure currency, with findings integrated into the propositions. In the final stage, feedback from external reviewers was used to enhance clarity and practical relevance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine propositions for evidence-informed practice in dietetic student assessment were developed. These propositions focus on aligning assessment with program learning outcomes, using varied learning tasks to generate trustworthy learning evidence, developing feedback literacy among education partners, involving expert assessors in progression decisions, and providing intermediate reviews to monitor student progress. The propositions emphasise the importance of student agency and recognise the influence of institutional structures and culture on assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The propositions provide a practical, whole-of-program approach to assessment that promotes learning and trustworthy progression decisions. The approach is recommended as the common assessment process across the dietetics profession. By aligning assessment practices across the curriculum and profession, these propositions seek to enhance educational outcomes and address the evolving challenges in dietetic student education.</p>","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":"518-536"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12583900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.70043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To develop evidence-informed propositions for implementing whole-of-program assessment across dietetic education settings, in response to emerging education theory, technological advances such as generative artificial intelligence, and the need for meaningful learning and trustworthy progression decisions.

Methods: A four-stage multiple methods study, grounded in pragmatism, was conducted. Initial propositions were developed through a systematic scoping review of programmatic assessment literature. Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns, which were iteratively refined into themes and then preliminary propositions. These were further refined through workshops with dietetic educators, who provided feedback based on their expertise. A repeated systematic scoping review incorporated recent research to ensure currency, with findings integrated into the propositions. In the final stage, feedback from external reviewers was used to enhance clarity and practical relevance.

Results: Nine propositions for evidence-informed practice in dietetic student assessment were developed. These propositions focus on aligning assessment with program learning outcomes, using varied learning tasks to generate trustworthy learning evidence, developing feedback literacy among education partners, involving expert assessors in progression decisions, and providing intermediate reviews to monitor student progress. The propositions emphasise the importance of student agency and recognise the influence of institutional structures and culture on assessment.

Conclusions: The propositions provide a practical, whole-of-program approach to assessment that promotes learning and trustworthy progression decisions. The approach is recommended as the common assessment process across the dietetics profession. By aligning assessment practices across the curriculum and profession, these propositions seek to enhance educational outcomes and address the evolving challenges in dietetic student education.

全项目评估方法的循证主张。
目的:针对新兴的教育理论、生成式人工智能等技术进步,以及对有意义的学习和值得信赖的进步决策的需求,为在饮食教育环境中实施全项目评估制定循证命题。方法:以实用主义为基础,进行四阶段多方法研究。最初的主张是通过对方案评估文献进行系统的范围审查而形成的。通过主题分析识别模式,迭代提炼成主题,再提炼成初步命题。通过与饮食教育工作者的研讨会,这些建议得到进一步完善,他们根据自己的专业知识提供反馈。一项反复的系统范围审查纳入了最近的研究,以确保有效,并将研究结果纳入各项主张。在最后阶段,使用外部审稿人的反馈来增强清晰度和实际相关性。结果:提出了9项关于膳食学生评估循证实践的建议。这些建议的重点是使评估与项目学习成果保持一致,使用不同的学习任务来生成可信的学习证据,在教育合作伙伴中培养反馈素养,让专家评估人员参与进度决策,并提供中间评估以监测学生的进步。这些主张强调学生代理的重要性,并承认制度结构和文化对评估的影响。结论:这些命题提供了一种实用的、全面的评估方法,促进了学习和值得信赖的进步决策。该方法被推荐为营养学专业的通用评估过程。通过调整整个课程和专业的评估实践,这些主张寻求提高教育成果,并解决营养学生教育中不断变化的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition & Dietetics
Nutrition & Dietetics 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书