Comparative performance of Scribe and database search engines in metaproteomic profiling of a ground-truth microbiome dataset

IF 3.1 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Journal of proteomics Pub Date : 2026-01-06 Epub Date: 2025-10-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jprot.2025.105549
Andrew T. Rajczewski , Subina Mehta , Reid Wagner , Wassim Gabriel , James Johnson , Katherine Do , Simina Vintila , Mathias Wilhelm , Manuel Kleiner , Brian C. Searle , Timothy J. Griffin , Pratik D. Jagtap
{"title":"Comparative performance of Scribe and database search engines in metaproteomic profiling of a ground-truth microbiome dataset","authors":"Andrew T. Rajczewski ,&nbsp;Subina Mehta ,&nbsp;Reid Wagner ,&nbsp;Wassim Gabriel ,&nbsp;James Johnson ,&nbsp;Katherine Do ,&nbsp;Simina Vintila ,&nbsp;Mathias Wilhelm ,&nbsp;Manuel Kleiner ,&nbsp;Brian C. Searle ,&nbsp;Timothy J. Griffin ,&nbsp;Pratik D. Jagtap","doi":"10.1016/j.jprot.2025.105549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mass spectrometry-based metaproteomics, the identification and quantification of thousands of proteins expressed by complex microbial communities, has become pivotal for unraveling functional interactions within microbiomes. However, metaproteomics data analysis encounters many challenges, including the search of tandem mass spectra against a protein sequence database using proteomics database search algorithms. We used a ground-truth dataset to assess a spectral library searching method against established database searching approaches. Mass spectrometry data collected by data-dependent acquisition (DDA-MS) was analyzed using database searching approaches (MaxQuant and FragPipe), as well as using Scribe with Prosit predicted spectral libraries. We used FASTA databases that included protein sequences from microbial species present in the ground-truth dataset along with background protein sequences, to estimate error rates and assess the effects on detection, peptide-spectral match quality, and quantification. Using the Scribe search engine resulted in more proteins detected at a 1 % false discovery rate (FDR) compared to MaxQuant or FragPipe, while FragPipe detected more peptides verified by PepQuery. Scribe was able to detect more low-abundance proteins in the microbiome dataset and was more accurate in quantifying the microbial community composition. This research provides insights and guidance for metaproteomics researchers aiming to optimize results in their analysis of DDA-MS data.</div></div><div><h3>Significance of the study</h3><div>Metaproteomics requires a balance between high numbers of peptide and protein identification and confidence in the accuracy of the identifications made. We demonstrate the utility of the Scribe search engine for metaproteomics applications, as it was found to detect low-abundance proteins with accurate quantitation than other DDA-MS search engines. This tool has great utility for both novel metaproteomics studies as well as hypothesis-generating experiments using previously acquired open source proteomics raw data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16891,"journal":{"name":"Journal of proteomics","volume":"322 ","pages":"Article 105549"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874391925001769","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mass spectrometry-based metaproteomics, the identification and quantification of thousands of proteins expressed by complex microbial communities, has become pivotal for unraveling functional interactions within microbiomes. However, metaproteomics data analysis encounters many challenges, including the search of tandem mass spectra against a protein sequence database using proteomics database search algorithms. We used a ground-truth dataset to assess a spectral library searching method against established database searching approaches. Mass spectrometry data collected by data-dependent acquisition (DDA-MS) was analyzed using database searching approaches (MaxQuant and FragPipe), as well as using Scribe with Prosit predicted spectral libraries. We used FASTA databases that included protein sequences from microbial species present in the ground-truth dataset along with background protein sequences, to estimate error rates and assess the effects on detection, peptide-spectral match quality, and quantification. Using the Scribe search engine resulted in more proteins detected at a 1 % false discovery rate (FDR) compared to MaxQuant or FragPipe, while FragPipe detected more peptides verified by PepQuery. Scribe was able to detect more low-abundance proteins in the microbiome dataset and was more accurate in quantifying the microbial community composition. This research provides insights and guidance for metaproteomics researchers aiming to optimize results in their analysis of DDA-MS data.

Significance of the study

Metaproteomics requires a balance between high numbers of peptide and protein identification and confidence in the accuracy of the identifications made. We demonstrate the utility of the Scribe search engine for metaproteomics applications, as it was found to detect low-abundance proteins with accurate quantitation than other DDA-MS search engines. This tool has great utility for both novel metaproteomics studies as well as hypothesis-generating experiments using previously acquired open source proteomics raw data.

Abstract Image

在真实微生物组数据集的元蛋白质组学分析中,scribe和数据库搜索引擎的比较性能。
基于质谱的宏蛋白质组学,鉴定和定量复杂微生物群落表达的数千种蛋白质,已成为揭示微生物组内功能相互作用的关键。然而,宏蛋白质组学数据分析面临着许多挑战,包括使用蛋白质组学数据库搜索算法在蛋白质序列数据库中搜索串联质谱。我们使用一个ground-truth数据集来评估光谱库搜索方法与现有数据库搜索方法的对比。通过数据依赖采集(DDA-MS)收集的质谱数据使用数据库搜索方法(MaxQuant和FragPipe)以及带有Prosit预测谱库的Scribe进行分析。我们使用FASTA数据库,包括来自微生物物种的蛋白质序列和背景蛋白质序列,以估计错误率并评估对检测、肽谱匹配质量和定量的影响。与MaxQuant或FragPipe相比,使用Scribe搜索引擎以1 %的错误发现率(FDR)检测到更多的蛋白质,而FragPipe检测到更多的经PepQuery验证的肽。Scribe能够在微生物组数据集中检测到更多的低丰度蛋白质,并且在量化微生物群落组成方面更加准确。本研究为宏蛋白质组学研究人员在DDA-MS数据分析中优化结果提供了见解和指导。研究意义:宏蛋白质组学需要在大量的肽和蛋白质鉴定和对鉴定准确性的信心之间取得平衡。我们展示了Scribe搜索引擎在宏蛋白质组学应用中的实用性,因为与其他DDA-MS搜索引擎相比,它可以准确定量地检测低丰度蛋白质。该工具对于新的宏蛋白质组学研究以及使用先前获得的开源蛋白质组学原始数据的假设生成实验都具有很大的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of proteomics
Journal of proteomics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
227
审稿时长
73 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteomics is aimed at protein scientists and analytical chemists in the field of proteomics, biomarker discovery, protein analytics, plant proteomics, microbial and animal proteomics, human studies, tissue imaging by mass spectrometry, non-conventional and non-model organism proteomics, and protein bioinformatics. The journal welcomes papers in new and upcoming areas such as metabolomics, genomics, systems biology, toxicogenomics, pharmacoproteomics. Journal of Proteomics unifies both fundamental scientists and clinicians, and includes translational research. Suggestions for reviews, webinars and thematic issues are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书