The journey of people accessing first trimester abortion in Aotearoa New Zealand: health consumers' perspectives.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Emma Macfarlane, Helen Paterson, Michael Stitely, Pauline Dawson
{"title":"The journey of people accessing first trimester abortion in Aotearoa New Zealand: health consumers' perspectives.","authors":"Emma Macfarlane, Helen Paterson, Michael Stitely, Pauline Dawson","doi":"10.1071/HC25011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) achieved abortion law reform in 2020, allowing people to choose abortion without legal restriction up to 20 weeks gestation. Abortion can now be provided by a range of health practitioners in a variety of settings. While some progress has been made, we are yet to see abortion care being provided within the full extent of the law.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe the journey of people accessing first-trimester abortion care in NZ to identify how abortion services can be developed to deliver optimal first-trimester abortion care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative study informed by phenomenology. Participants were recruited via a separate national survey to participate in in-depth interviews. Analysis was undertaken using a reflexive inductive approach to identify themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven people were recruited. Analysis revealed four themes: (1) decision making (to have an abortion, choice of method, and coercive contraceptive decision making); (2) barriers to access (abortion service navigation, lack of access in rural areas including requirement to travel, abortion requirements); (3) abortion as a societal issue (abortion is isolating, 'slut-shaming', abortion is the taking of a life); and (4) empathy and advocacy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite decriminalisation of abortion in NZ, barriers remain. Work is required to improve access to accurate and non-judgemental information to inform decision-making. People value kind, non-judgemental clinicians and supportive whanau/friends play a major role in optimising the experience. Abortion stigma persists and has a negative impact on the abortion experience. Abortion services need support to ensure they are responsive to the needs of health consumers and reduce barriers to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":"117-123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC25011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) achieved abortion law reform in 2020, allowing people to choose abortion without legal restriction up to 20 weeks gestation. Abortion can now be provided by a range of health practitioners in a variety of settings. While some progress has been made, we are yet to see abortion care being provided within the full extent of the law.

Aim: To describe the journey of people accessing first-trimester abortion care in NZ to identify how abortion services can be developed to deliver optimal first-trimester abortion care.

Methods: This was a qualitative study informed by phenomenology. Participants were recruited via a separate national survey to participate in in-depth interviews. Analysis was undertaken using a reflexive inductive approach to identify themes.

Results: Seven people were recruited. Analysis revealed four themes: (1) decision making (to have an abortion, choice of method, and coercive contraceptive decision making); (2) barriers to access (abortion service navigation, lack of access in rural areas including requirement to travel, abortion requirements); (3) abortion as a societal issue (abortion is isolating, 'slut-shaming', abortion is the taking of a life); and (4) empathy and advocacy.

Discussion: Despite decriminalisation of abortion in NZ, barriers remain. Work is required to improve access to accurate and non-judgemental information to inform decision-making. People value kind, non-judgemental clinicians and supportive whanau/friends play a major role in optimising the experience. Abortion stigma persists and has a negative impact on the abortion experience. Abortion services need support to ensure they are responsive to the needs of health consumers and reduce barriers to care.

新西兰奥特罗阿人获得早期妊娠流产的历程:保健消费者的观点。
导言:新西兰(NZ)在2020年实现了堕胎法改革,允许人们在怀孕20周内不受法律限制地选择堕胎。堕胎现在可以由各种卫生从业人员在各种环境中提供。虽然已经取得了一些进展,但我们还没有看到在法律的全部范围内提供堕胎护理。目的:描述在新西兰获得早期妊娠流产护理的人的旅程,以确定如何开发堕胎服务以提供最佳的早期妊娠流产护理。方法:采用现象学的定性研究方法。参与者是通过一项单独的全国性调查招募的,参与深度访谈。采用反身性归纳方法进行分析以确定主题。结果:招募了7人。分析揭示了四个主题:(1)决策(是否堕胎、方法选择和强制避孕决策);(2)获取障碍(堕胎服务导航、农村地区缺乏包括旅行要求在内的获取渠道、堕胎要求);(3)堕胎是一个社会问题(堕胎是孤立的,“荡妇耻辱”,堕胎是夺走生命);(4)移情和倡导。讨论:尽管堕胎在新西兰合法化,障碍仍然存在。需要努力改善获得准确和非判断性信息的机会,以便为决策提供信息。人们重视善良、不评判的临床医生和支持他们的朋友在优化体验方面发挥着重要作用。堕胎耻辱持续存在,并对堕胎经历产生负面影响。堕胎服务需要得到支持,以确保它们能够满足保健消费者的需求,并减少获得护理的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of primary health care
Journal of primary health care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书