Emma Macfarlane, Helen Paterson, Michael Stitely, Pauline Dawson
{"title":"The journey of people accessing first trimester abortion in Aotearoa New Zealand: health consumers' perspectives.","authors":"Emma Macfarlane, Helen Paterson, Michael Stitely, Pauline Dawson","doi":"10.1071/HC25011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) achieved abortion law reform in 2020, allowing people to choose abortion without legal restriction up to 20 weeks gestation. Abortion can now be provided by a range of health practitioners in a variety of settings. While some progress has been made, we are yet to see abortion care being provided within the full extent of the law.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe the journey of people accessing first-trimester abortion care in NZ to identify how abortion services can be developed to deliver optimal first-trimester abortion care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative study informed by phenomenology. Participants were recruited via a separate national survey to participate in in-depth interviews. Analysis was undertaken using a reflexive inductive approach to identify themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven people were recruited. Analysis revealed four themes: (1) decision making (to have an abortion, choice of method, and coercive contraceptive decision making); (2) barriers to access (abortion service navigation, lack of access in rural areas including requirement to travel, abortion requirements); (3) abortion as a societal issue (abortion is isolating, 'slut-shaming', abortion is the taking of a life); and (4) empathy and advocacy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite decriminalisation of abortion in NZ, barriers remain. Work is required to improve access to accurate and non-judgemental information to inform decision-making. People value kind, non-judgemental clinicians and supportive whanau/friends play a major role in optimising the experience. Abortion stigma persists and has a negative impact on the abortion experience. Abortion services need support to ensure they are responsive to the needs of health consumers and reduce barriers to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":"117-123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC25011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) achieved abortion law reform in 2020, allowing people to choose abortion without legal restriction up to 20 weeks gestation. Abortion can now be provided by a range of health practitioners in a variety of settings. While some progress has been made, we are yet to see abortion care being provided within the full extent of the law.
Aim: To describe the journey of people accessing first-trimester abortion care in NZ to identify how abortion services can be developed to deliver optimal first-trimester abortion care.
Methods: This was a qualitative study informed by phenomenology. Participants were recruited via a separate national survey to participate in in-depth interviews. Analysis was undertaken using a reflexive inductive approach to identify themes.
Results: Seven people were recruited. Analysis revealed four themes: (1) decision making (to have an abortion, choice of method, and coercive contraceptive decision making); (2) barriers to access (abortion service navigation, lack of access in rural areas including requirement to travel, abortion requirements); (3) abortion as a societal issue (abortion is isolating, 'slut-shaming', abortion is the taking of a life); and (4) empathy and advocacy.
Discussion: Despite decriminalisation of abortion in NZ, barriers remain. Work is required to improve access to accurate and non-judgemental information to inform decision-making. People value kind, non-judgemental clinicians and supportive whanau/friends play a major role in optimising the experience. Abortion stigma persists and has a negative impact on the abortion experience. Abortion services need support to ensure they are responsive to the needs of health consumers and reduce barriers to care.