Physical activity and glycaemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes in Suva, Fiji: a cross sectional pilot study.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Elizabeth Mundia, Ramneek Goundar, Kissinger Marfoh
{"title":"Physical activity and glycaemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes in Suva, Fiji: a cross sectional pilot study.","authors":"Elizabeth Mundia, Ramneek Goundar, Kissinger Marfoh","doi":"10.1071/HC25096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a major health burden in Fiji (19.3% prevalence). Evidence suggests increased physical activity improves glycaemic control and health outcomes; however, this remains unstudied in Fiji's population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess physical activity levels and explore its relationship with glycaemic control among diabetic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative, cross-sectional pilot study was conducted at Samabula Health Center, Fiji, from September to November 2022 using convenience sampling for 174 adults with diabetes. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire, short form, assessed physical activity, whereas capillary fasting and random blood sugar assessed glycaemic control targets. Logistic regression analysed associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found 64% of participants were physically inactive, with females significantly less active than males (odds ratio (OR) = 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.25-0.98). Poor glycaemic control was common (75%), although adherence to lifestyle and pharmacological management plans were significantly associated with good control (OR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.05-5.37). Increased physical activity levels were not significantly associated with meeting glycaemic control targets.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite clinic attendance, patients with diabetes remained inactive, had poor glycaemic control and were non-adherent to lifestyle and drug treatment. Contradicting previous evidence, physical activity was not associated with meeting glycaemic control targets, possibly reflecting point-of-care glucose variability compared to the gold-standard glycated hemoglobin measure (HbA1c), and cross-sectional study design limiting causal interpretation. Future research should investigate glycaemic control and physical activity barriers, especially among women, physician practices and test culturally adapted interventions. Fiji's National Wellness Policy and Non-Communicable Disease (NCD) Strategic Plan must consider strengthening diabetes management guidelines, clinician training and patient support to address systemic gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":"295-302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC25096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a major health burden in Fiji (19.3% prevalence). Evidence suggests increased physical activity improves glycaemic control and health outcomes; however, this remains unstudied in Fiji's population.

Aim: This study aimed to assess physical activity levels and explore its relationship with glycaemic control among diabetic patients.

Methods: A quantitative, cross-sectional pilot study was conducted at Samabula Health Center, Fiji, from September to November 2022 using convenience sampling for 174 adults with diabetes. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire, short form, assessed physical activity, whereas capillary fasting and random blood sugar assessed glycaemic control targets. Logistic regression analysed associations.

Results: The study found 64% of participants were physically inactive, with females significantly less active than males (odds ratio (OR) = 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.25-0.98). Poor glycaemic control was common (75%), although adherence to lifestyle and pharmacological management plans were significantly associated with good control (OR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.05-5.37). Increased physical activity levels were not significantly associated with meeting glycaemic control targets.

Discussion: Despite clinic attendance, patients with diabetes remained inactive, had poor glycaemic control and were non-adherent to lifestyle and drug treatment. Contradicting previous evidence, physical activity was not associated with meeting glycaemic control targets, possibly reflecting point-of-care glucose variability compared to the gold-standard glycated hemoglobin measure (HbA1c), and cross-sectional study design limiting causal interpretation. Future research should investigate glycaemic control and physical activity barriers, especially among women, physician practices and test culturally adapted interventions. Fiji's National Wellness Policy and Non-Communicable Disease (NCD) Strategic Plan must consider strengthening diabetes management guidelines, clinician training and patient support to address systemic gaps.

斐济苏瓦成人2型糖尿病患者的身体活动和血糖控制:一项横断面试点研究
2型糖尿病是斐济的主要健康负担(患病率为19.3%)。有证据表明,增加体力活动可以改善血糖控制和健康状况;然而,这在斐济的人口中仍未得到研究。目的:探讨糖尿病患者身体活动水平与血糖控制的关系。方法:2022年9月至11月,在斐济Samabula卫生中心对174名成年糖尿病患者进行了一项定量、横断面的试点研究。简短的国际身体活动问卷评估身体活动,而毛细血管禁食和随机血糖评估血糖控制目标。Logistic回归分析相关性。结果:研究发现64%的参与者不运动,女性明显少于男性(优势比(OR) = 0.49, 95%可信区间(CI) = 0.25-0.98)。血糖控制不良是常见的(75%),尽管坚持生活方式和药物管理计划与良好控制显著相关(OR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.05-5.37)。增加的体力活动水平与达到血糖控制目标没有显著关联。讨论:尽管就诊,糖尿病患者仍然不运动,血糖控制不良,不坚持生活方式和药物治疗。与先前的证据相反,体力活动与达到血糖控制目标无关,与金标准糖化血红蛋白测量(HbA1c)相比,可能反映了即时血糖变异性,并且横断面研究设计限制了因果解释。未来的研究应该调查血糖控制和身体活动障碍,特别是在女性中,医生实践和测试适应文化的干预措施。斐济的国家健康政策和非传染性疾病战略计划必须考虑加强糖尿病管理指南、临床医生培训和患者支持,以解决系统性差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of primary health care
Journal of primary health care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书