Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Cranial Ultrasound for Initial Assessment of Infants Without Suspected Trauma in the Pediatric Emergency Department

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.05.002
Takaaki Mori MD, MRCPCH, MSc, Sung Shin Teng MBBS, MRCPCH, FAMS, Gene Yong-Kwang Ong MBBS, MRCPCH
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Cranial Ultrasound for Initial Assessment of Infants Without Suspected Trauma in the Pediatric Emergency Department","authors":"Takaaki Mori MD, MRCPCH, MSc,&nbsp;Sung Shin Teng MBBS, MRCPCH, FAMS,&nbsp;Gene Yong-Kwang Ong MBBS, MRCPCH","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cranial point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has shown efficacy for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in pediatric emergency care. However, reports of its use in patients without trauma are limited.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of cranial POCUS for identifying intracranial pathologies in infants without a history of trauma in a pediatric emergency department (PED).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective, observational study was conducted in the PED of a tertiary children’s hospital between March 2020 and March 2024. Pediatric patients aged &lt;2 years without a history of trauma who underwent cranial POCUS were included in the study. Pediatric patients with suspected traumatic brain injuries who underwent cranial POCUS were excluded. The cranial POCUS was performed by trained pediatric emergency physicians. Neuroradiological imaging including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and radiology department ultrasound was used as the reference standard. If patients did not undergo neuroradiological imaging, clinical follow-up was used as a surrogate to detect the likelihood of serious intercranial pathologies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the study period, 75 patients underwent cranial POCUS, and 51 were included in the analyses. The median age was 2 months, [interquartile range; 0 to 5 months]. Seizures (20/52), and apnea (8/52) were the common indications for cranial POCUS. The sensitivity and specificity of cranial POCUS were 40.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]; 13.4–56.1%) and 97.8% (95% CI; 94.9–99.6%), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cranial POCUS performed by pediatric emergency physicians demonstrated high specificity for identifying intracranial pathologies in infants without trauma in the PED. However, the sensitivity of this method was low.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"79 ","pages":"Pages 143-150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467925001726","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cranial point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has shown efficacy for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in pediatric emergency care. However, reports of its use in patients without trauma are limited.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of cranial POCUS for identifying intracranial pathologies in infants without a history of trauma in a pediatric emergency department (PED).

Methods

This retrospective, observational study was conducted in the PED of a tertiary children’s hospital between March 2020 and March 2024. Pediatric patients aged <2 years without a history of trauma who underwent cranial POCUS were included in the study. Pediatric patients with suspected traumatic brain injuries who underwent cranial POCUS were excluded. The cranial POCUS was performed by trained pediatric emergency physicians. Neuroradiological imaging including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and radiology department ultrasound was used as the reference standard. If patients did not undergo neuroradiological imaging, clinical follow-up was used as a surrogate to detect the likelihood of serious intercranial pathologies.

Results

During the study period, 75 patients underwent cranial POCUS, and 51 were included in the analyses. The median age was 2 months, [interquartile range; 0 to 5 months]. Seizures (20/52), and apnea (8/52) were the common indications for cranial POCUS. The sensitivity and specificity of cranial POCUS were 40.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]; 13.4–56.1%) and 97.8% (95% CI; 94.9–99.6%), respectively.

Conclusions

Cranial POCUS performed by pediatric emergency physicians demonstrated high specificity for identifying intracranial pathologies in infants without trauma in the PED. However, the sensitivity of this method was low.
在儿科急诊科对无疑似创伤的婴儿进行初步评估的即时颅脑超声诊断的准确性。
背景:颅点超声(POCUS)在小儿外伤性颅内出血的急诊治疗中显示出疗效。然而,在无创伤患者中使用的报道是有限的。目的:本研究旨在评估颅内POCUS在儿科急诊科(PED)无创伤史婴儿颅内病变诊断中的准确性。方法:本回顾性观察性研究于2020年3月至2024年3月在某三级儿童医院PED进行。结果:在研究期间,75例患者接受了颅脑POCUS,其中51例纳入分析。中位年龄为2个月,[四分位数范围;0 ~ 5个月]。癫痫发作(20/52)和呼吸暂停(8/52)是颅脑POCUS的常见适应症。颅内POCUS的敏感性和特异性分别为40.0%(95%可信区间[CI]; 13.4 ~ 56.1%)和97.8% (95% CI; 94.9 ~ 99.6%)。结论:儿科急诊医师进行的颅POCUS在识别无PED创伤的婴儿颅内病变方面具有很高的特异性。但该方法的灵敏度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书