Barriers and Facilitators for Implementation of Palliative Care for Patients with Heart failure - a Rapid Synthesis of Reviews.

IF 3.7 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Thomas Grice-Jackson, Pier Jaarsma, Maria Friedrichsen, Malin Idar Wallin, Everlien De Graaf, Anna Strömberg, Tiny Jaarsma
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators for Implementation of Palliative Care for Patients with Heart failure - a Rapid Synthesis of Reviews.","authors":"Thomas Grice-Jackson, Pier Jaarsma, Maria Friedrichsen, Malin Idar Wallin, Everlien De Graaf, Anna Strömberg, Tiny Jaarsma","doi":"10.1007/s11897-025-00715-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>While the benefits and need for integrating palliative care (PC) services into heart failure (HF) care have been well recognized, integration has been slow. Currently, only a small proportion of patients with HF utilize PC services, meaning there is a discrepancy between the knowledge about optimal care and the implementation of care. In recent years researchers have attempted to understand the barriers and facilitators of implementing PC models to patients with HF which has been captured in both primary, empirical research and secondary literature review papers. We aimed to synthesize these barriers and facilitators to the implementation of PC approaches for patients with HF within a well-known framework for assessing determinants of implementation, the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>We conducted a rapid synthesis of reviews using systematic review methods which sought to collate existing review articles pertaining to the research question. We used four search term categories: (1) Heart failure, (2) Palliative care, (3) Implementation, and (4) Review. We conducted searches in four databases (Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, COCHRANE) on the 1st of September 2025. We used the CFIR framework to synthesize the data. Firstly, we extracted key barriers and facilitators from the articles. We then categorized this information into sub-constructions of two of the CFIR's constructs (II. the Outer setting and III. The Inner setting). The search generated 2,080 results, of which 512 were duplicates. After screening, twenty-nine reviews were included in the data extraction and synthesis process. A range of barriers and facilitators were highlighted across the reviews. For the inner setting, this included a need for improving communication with patients and between healthcare professionals (HCPs) by engaging more openly and honestly about dying, an increase in joint working as part of multidisciplinary teams, funding and resource issues, and workforce recruitment and training issues. For the outer setting barriers and facilitators were associated with prognostic challenges and the complexity of caring for patients with HF, the needs of HF and geriatric patients, and the evidence and policy landscape associated with the principles of care and implementation of care for HF patients. Despite knowledge about the importance of PC, HCPs will struggle to integrate it into heart failure care unless they address practical, social, cultural, clinical, and economic determinants associated with care. By doing so, health care providers can develop implementation strategies for improving care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10830,"journal":{"name":"Current Heart Failure Reports","volume":"22 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12552346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Heart Failure Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-025-00715-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the review: While the benefits and need for integrating palliative care (PC) services into heart failure (HF) care have been well recognized, integration has been slow. Currently, only a small proportion of patients with HF utilize PC services, meaning there is a discrepancy between the knowledge about optimal care and the implementation of care. In recent years researchers have attempted to understand the barriers and facilitators of implementing PC models to patients with HF which has been captured in both primary, empirical research and secondary literature review papers. We aimed to synthesize these barriers and facilitators to the implementation of PC approaches for patients with HF within a well-known framework for assessing determinants of implementation, the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR).

Recent findings: We conducted a rapid synthesis of reviews using systematic review methods which sought to collate existing review articles pertaining to the research question. We used four search term categories: (1) Heart failure, (2) Palliative care, (3) Implementation, and (4) Review. We conducted searches in four databases (Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, COCHRANE) on the 1st of September 2025. We used the CFIR framework to synthesize the data. Firstly, we extracted key barriers and facilitators from the articles. We then categorized this information into sub-constructions of two of the CFIR's constructs (II. the Outer setting and III. The Inner setting). The search generated 2,080 results, of which 512 were duplicates. After screening, twenty-nine reviews were included in the data extraction and synthesis process. A range of barriers and facilitators were highlighted across the reviews. For the inner setting, this included a need for improving communication with patients and between healthcare professionals (HCPs) by engaging more openly and honestly about dying, an increase in joint working as part of multidisciplinary teams, funding and resource issues, and workforce recruitment and training issues. For the outer setting barriers and facilitators were associated with prognostic challenges and the complexity of caring for patients with HF, the needs of HF and geriatric patients, and the evidence and policy landscape associated with the principles of care and implementation of care for HF patients. Despite knowledge about the importance of PC, HCPs will struggle to integrate it into heart failure care unless they address practical, social, cultural, clinical, and economic determinants associated with care. By doing so, health care providers can develop implementation strategies for improving care.

Abstract Image

对心力衰竭患者实施姑息治疗的障碍和促进因素——综述的快速综合。
综述的目的:虽然将姑息治疗(PC)服务纳入心力衰竭(HF)治疗的益处和需求已得到充分认识,但整合进展缓慢。目前,只有一小部分心衰患者利用PC服务,这意味着关于最佳护理的知识与护理的实施之间存在差异。近年来,研究人员试图了解对心衰患者实施PC模型的障碍和促进因素,这在初级、实证研究和二级文献综述论文中都得到了证实。我们的目的是综合这些障碍和促进因素,在一个众所周知的评估实施决定因素的框架内,对心衰患者实施PC方法,即实施研究的综合框架(CFIR)。最近的发现:我们使用系统综述方法对综述进行了快速综合,该方法试图整理与研究问题相关的现有综述文章。我们使用了四个搜索词类别:(1)心力衰竭,(2)姑息治疗,(3)实施,(4)回顾。我们于2025年9月1日在Scopus、EMBASE、CINAHL、COCHRANE四个数据库中进行检索。我们使用CFIR框架对数据进行综合。首先,我们从文章中提取关键障碍和促进因素。然后,我们将这些信息分类为两个CFIR结构(II)的子结构。2 .外部环境;内部设置)。搜索产生了2080个结果,其中512个是重复的。经筛选,29篇综述纳入数据提取和综合过程。在审查过程中,突出了一系列障碍和促进因素。对于内部环境,这包括需要通过更公开和诚实地参与死亡来改善与患者和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)之间的沟通,增加作为多学科团队一部分的联合工作,资金和资源问题,以及劳动力招聘和培训问题。外部环境障碍和促进因素与心衰患者的预后挑战和护理复杂性、心衰患者和老年患者的需求以及与心衰患者护理原则和实施相关的证据和政策环境有关。尽管了解了PC的重要性,但HCPs将努力将其纳入心力衰竭护理,除非他们解决与护理相关的实际、社会、文化、临床和经济决定因素。通过这样做,卫生保健提供者可以制定改善护理的实施战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Heart Failure Reports
Current Heart Failure Reports Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of heart failure. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as investigative, pharmacologic, and nonpharmacologic therapies, pathophysiology, and prevention. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书