Crowding-out and crowding-in effects of out-of-pocket expenditures for non-communicable diseases care on household consumption patterns in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2022 household income and expenditure survey.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Md Tauhidul Islam, Adelakun Odunyemi, Mieghan Bruce, Khurshid Alam
{"title":"Crowding-out and crowding-in effects of out-of-pocket expenditures for non-communicable diseases care on household consumption patterns in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2022 household income and expenditure survey.","authors":"Md Tauhidul Islam, Adelakun Odunyemi, Mieghan Bruce, Khurshid Alam","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to analyse the crowding-out and crowding-in effects of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) related out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenditures on household consumption in Bangladesh.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>DESIGN: This study used data from the nationally representative Bangladesh household income and expenditure survey (HIES) 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eight divisions of Bangladesh.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>14 395 households.</p><p><strong>Primary and secondary outcome measures: </strong>We examined how household consumption patterns across 20 expenditure categories were impacted by OOP health spending for NCD management, with a focus on income-level disparities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Bangladesh, OOP health expenditures for NCDs crowded out household expenditures on essential items like food and rent. Across all households, OOP health expenditures for NCDs by 10 US$ crowded out -3.8 US$ of expenditure on food (95% CI -5.1 to -2.5), and more specifically on protein-rich foods (-2.0 US$, 95% CI -2.8 to -1.2), spices (-0.2 US$, 95% CI -0.3 to -0.1), and restaurant and café meals (-0.9 US$, 95% CI -1.4 to -0.5). Crowding-out was also seen for tobacco, rent, durable goods and miscellaneous. In lower-income households, expenditures on food (-4.1 US$, 95% CI -7.2 to -1.1), restaurant and café meals (-2.0 US$, 95% CI -3.1 to -0.8), spices (-0.4 US$, 95% CI -0.7 to -0.09), and rent (-3.1 US$, 95% CI -4.5 to -1.6) were significantly crowded out.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research demonstrates that NCD-related spending in Bangladesh reduces budgets for both food and non-food expenditures, with a stronger crowding-out effect on food items and rent, particularly in lower-income households. Effective financial and social protection mechanisms against NCDs are warranted to safeguard the consumption of the NCD-affected households in Bangladesh.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 10","pages":"e098791"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098791","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the crowding-out and crowding-in effects of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) related out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenditures on household consumption in Bangladesh.

Objective: DESIGN: This study used data from the nationally representative Bangladesh household income and expenditure survey (HIES) 2022.

Setting: Eight divisions of Bangladesh.

Participants: 14 395 households.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: We examined how household consumption patterns across 20 expenditure categories were impacted by OOP health spending for NCD management, with a focus on income-level disparities.

Results: In Bangladesh, OOP health expenditures for NCDs crowded out household expenditures on essential items like food and rent. Across all households, OOP health expenditures for NCDs by 10 US$ crowded out -3.8 US$ of expenditure on food (95% CI -5.1 to -2.5), and more specifically on protein-rich foods (-2.0 US$, 95% CI -2.8 to -1.2), spices (-0.2 US$, 95% CI -0.3 to -0.1), and restaurant and café meals (-0.9 US$, 95% CI -1.4 to -0.5). Crowding-out was also seen for tobacco, rent, durable goods and miscellaneous. In lower-income households, expenditures on food (-4.1 US$, 95% CI -7.2 to -1.1), restaurant and café meals (-2.0 US$, 95% CI -3.1 to -0.8), spices (-0.4 US$, 95% CI -0.7 to -0.09), and rent (-3.1 US$, 95% CI -4.5 to -1.6) were significantly crowded out.

Conclusion: This research demonstrates that NCD-related spending in Bangladesh reduces budgets for both food and non-food expenditures, with a stronger crowding-out effect on food items and rent, particularly in lower-income households. Effective financial and social protection mechanisms against NCDs are warranted to safeguard the consumption of the NCD-affected households in Bangladesh.

非传染性疾病护理自费支出对孟加拉国家庭消费模式的挤出和挤入效应:对2022年家庭收入和支出调查的横断面分析。
本研究旨在分析孟加拉国非传染性疾病(NCDs)相关的自付(OOP)卫生支出对家庭消费的挤出和挤入效应。目的:设计:本研究使用了具有全国代表性的孟加拉国家庭收入和支出调查(HIES) 2022的数据。环境:孟加拉国的八个分区。调查对象:14 395户。主要和次要结果测量:我们研究了20个支出类别的家庭消费模式如何受到非传染性疾病管理的OOP卫生支出的影响,重点是收入水平差异。结果:在孟加拉国,非传染性疾病的整体卫生支出挤占了家庭在食品和租金等基本项目上的支出。在所有家庭中,非传染性疾病的OOP卫生支出比食品支出多10美元(95%置信区间为-5.1至-2.5),特别是富含蛋白质的食品(-2.0美元,95%置信区间为-2.8至-1.2)、香料(-0.2美元,95%置信区间为-0.3至-0.1)以及餐馆和咖啡馆餐食(-0.9美元,95%置信区间为-1.4至-0.5)。烟草、租金、耐用品和杂项也出现了挤出现象。在低收入家庭中,食品支出(-4.1美元,95%置信区间为-7.2至-1.1)、餐馆和咖啡馆餐食支出(-2.0美元,95%置信区间为-3.1至-0.8)、香料支出(-0.4美元,95%置信区间为-0.7至-0.09)和租金支出(-3.1美元,95%置信区间为-4.5至-1.6)明显被挤出。结论:本研究表明,孟加拉国与非传染性疾病相关的支出减少了食品和非食品支出的预算,对食品和租金产生了更强的挤出效应,特别是在低收入家庭中。有必要建立针对非传染性疾病的有效财政和社会保护机制,以保障孟加拉国受非传染性疾病影响家庭的消费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信