Evaluation of single-use disk stack continuous centrifuge to harvest monoclonal antibody from cell culture fluid

IF 2.8 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Biotechnology Progress Pub Date : 2026-02-16 Epub Date: 2025-10-23 DOI:10.1002/btpr.70084
Ailan Xu, Lei Gong, Chenglong Deng, Wangjian Sheng, Chen Hua, Bingxin Lu, Chen Li, Jun Ma, Jingbo Zhou, Xiao Zhang, Yiqing Cui
{"title":"Evaluation of single-use disk stack continuous centrifuge to harvest monoclonal antibody from cell culture fluid","authors":"Ailan Xu,&nbsp;Lei Gong,&nbsp;Chenglong Deng,&nbsp;Wangjian Sheng,&nbsp;Chen Hua,&nbsp;Bingxin Lu,&nbsp;Chen Li,&nbsp;Jun Ma,&nbsp;Jingbo Zhou,&nbsp;Xiao Zhang,&nbsp;Yiqing Cui","doi":"10.1002/btpr.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Various technologies, including precipitation, flocculation, depth filtration, microfiltration, and centrifugation, have been developed to clarify mammalian cell culture fluids. For processing volumes between 2000 and 5000 L, continuous centrifugation followed by depth filtration is the preferred method. This process starts with the removal of cells and large debris through continuous centrifugation, followed by the filtration of small debris and some impurities. The newly introduced single-use centrifuge, designed to prevent cross-contamination and mimic traditional continuous centrifuges, was evaluated for its performance, particularly focusing on its impact on cell lysis and subsequent filtration and purification processes. The single-use centrifuge showed better performance in reducing turbidity and lactate dehydrogenase levels (LDH) in the supernatant, indicating less cell lysis compared to the conventional centrifuge. A separation load factor range of 0.91–2.73 was identified as optimal for balancing centrifugation throughput and product quality. Both centrifuge types had a comparable impact on the performance of subsequent depth filtration, supporting a load capacity of at least 100 L/m<sup>2</sup>. No significant differences in product quality, including SE-HPLC, NR/R CE-SDS, icIEF, HCP, and rDNA, were observed between the conventional and single-use centrifuges. These harvest strategies did not affect the subsequent purification steps. For volumes up to 5000 L, both centrifuge types are viable; however, for larger volumes, the conventional centrifuge is necessary due to the scale limitations of the single-use centrifuge.</p>","PeriodicalId":8856,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Progress","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/btpr.70084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various technologies, including precipitation, flocculation, depth filtration, microfiltration, and centrifugation, have been developed to clarify mammalian cell culture fluids. For processing volumes between 2000 and 5000 L, continuous centrifugation followed by depth filtration is the preferred method. This process starts with the removal of cells and large debris through continuous centrifugation, followed by the filtration of small debris and some impurities. The newly introduced single-use centrifuge, designed to prevent cross-contamination and mimic traditional continuous centrifuges, was evaluated for its performance, particularly focusing on its impact on cell lysis and subsequent filtration and purification processes. The single-use centrifuge showed better performance in reducing turbidity and lactate dehydrogenase levels (LDH) in the supernatant, indicating less cell lysis compared to the conventional centrifuge. A separation load factor range of 0.91–2.73 was identified as optimal for balancing centrifugation throughput and product quality. Both centrifuge types had a comparable impact on the performance of subsequent depth filtration, supporting a load capacity of at least 100 L/m2. No significant differences in product quality, including SE-HPLC, NR/R CE-SDS, icIEF, HCP, and rDNA, were observed between the conventional and single-use centrifuges. These harvest strategies did not affect the subsequent purification steps. For volumes up to 5000 L, both centrifuge types are viable; however, for larger volumes, the conventional centrifuge is necessary due to the scale limitations of the single-use centrifuge.

一次性圆盘叠置连续离心机从细胞培养液中获取单克隆抗体的评价。
各种技术,包括沉淀、絮凝、深度过滤、微滤和离心,已经发展用于澄清哺乳动物细胞培养液。对于2000 - 5000 L的处理量,首选的方法是连续离心,然后进行深度过滤。这个过程首先通过连续离心去除细胞和大的碎屑,然后过滤小的碎屑和一些杂质。新推出的一次性离心机旨在防止交叉污染,并模仿传统的连续离心机,对其性能进行了评估,特别关注其对细胞裂解和随后的过滤和纯化过程的影响。一次性离心机在降低上清浊度和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平方面表现出更好的性能,表明与常规离心机相比,细胞裂解较少。分离负荷因子范围为0.91 ~ 2.73,是平衡离心吞吐量和产品质量的最佳选择。两种离心机类型对后续深度过滤性能的影响相当,支持至少100 L/m2的负载能力。常规离心机与一次性离心机在SE-HPLC、NR/R CE-SDS、icIEF、HCP和rDNA等产品质量上无显著差异。这些收获策略不影响后续的纯化步骤。对于容量高达5000升,两种离心机类型都是可行的;然而,对于更大的体积,由于一次性离心机的规模限制,传统离心机是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biotechnology Progress
Biotechnology Progress 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
83
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Biotechnology Progress , an official, bimonthly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and its technological community, the Society for Biological Engineering, features peer-reviewed research articles, reviews, and descriptions of emerging techniques for the development and design of new processes, products, and devices for the biotechnology, biopharmaceutical and bioprocess industries. Widespread interest includes application of biological and engineering principles in fields such as applied cellular physiology and metabolic engineering, biocatalysis and bioreactor design, bioseparations and downstream processing, cell culture and tissue engineering, biosensors and process control, bioinformatics and systems biology, biomaterials and artificial organs, stem cell biology and genetics, and plant biology and food science. Manuscripts concerning the design of related processes, products, or devices are also encouraged. Four types of manuscripts are printed in the Journal: Research Papers, Topical or Review Papers, Letters to the Editor, and R & D Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书