Ailan Xu, Lei Gong, Chenglong Deng, Wangjian Sheng, Chen Hua, Bingxin Lu, Chen Li, Jun Ma, Jingbo Zhou, Xiao Zhang, Yiqing Cui
{"title":"Evaluation of single-use disk stack continuous centrifuge to harvest monoclonal antibody from cell culture fluid","authors":"Ailan Xu, Lei Gong, Chenglong Deng, Wangjian Sheng, Chen Hua, Bingxin Lu, Chen Li, Jun Ma, Jingbo Zhou, Xiao Zhang, Yiqing Cui","doi":"10.1002/btpr.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Various technologies, including precipitation, flocculation, depth filtration, microfiltration, and centrifugation, have been developed to clarify mammalian cell culture fluids. For processing volumes between 2000 and 5000 L, continuous centrifugation followed by depth filtration is the preferred method. This process starts with the removal of cells and large debris through continuous centrifugation, followed by the filtration of small debris and some impurities. The newly introduced single-use centrifuge, designed to prevent cross-contamination and mimic traditional continuous centrifuges, was evaluated for its performance, particularly focusing on its impact on cell lysis and subsequent filtration and purification processes. The single-use centrifuge showed better performance in reducing turbidity and lactate dehydrogenase levels (LDH) in the supernatant, indicating less cell lysis compared to the conventional centrifuge. A separation load factor range of 0.91–2.73 was identified as optimal for balancing centrifugation throughput and product quality. Both centrifuge types had a comparable impact on the performance of subsequent depth filtration, supporting a load capacity of at least 100 L/m<sup>2</sup>. No significant differences in product quality, including SE-HPLC, NR/R CE-SDS, icIEF, HCP, and rDNA, were observed between the conventional and single-use centrifuges. These harvest strategies did not affect the subsequent purification steps. For volumes up to 5000 L, both centrifuge types are viable; however, for larger volumes, the conventional centrifuge is necessary due to the scale limitations of the single-use centrifuge.</p>","PeriodicalId":8856,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Progress","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/btpr.70084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Various technologies, including precipitation, flocculation, depth filtration, microfiltration, and centrifugation, have been developed to clarify mammalian cell culture fluids. For processing volumes between 2000 and 5000 L, continuous centrifugation followed by depth filtration is the preferred method. This process starts with the removal of cells and large debris through continuous centrifugation, followed by the filtration of small debris and some impurities. The newly introduced single-use centrifuge, designed to prevent cross-contamination and mimic traditional continuous centrifuges, was evaluated for its performance, particularly focusing on its impact on cell lysis and subsequent filtration and purification processes. The single-use centrifuge showed better performance in reducing turbidity and lactate dehydrogenase levels (LDH) in the supernatant, indicating less cell lysis compared to the conventional centrifuge. A separation load factor range of 0.91–2.73 was identified as optimal for balancing centrifugation throughput and product quality. Both centrifuge types had a comparable impact on the performance of subsequent depth filtration, supporting a load capacity of at least 100 L/m2. No significant differences in product quality, including SE-HPLC, NR/R CE-SDS, icIEF, HCP, and rDNA, were observed between the conventional and single-use centrifuges. These harvest strategies did not affect the subsequent purification steps. For volumes up to 5000 L, both centrifuge types are viable; however, for larger volumes, the conventional centrifuge is necessary due to the scale limitations of the single-use centrifuge.
期刊介绍:
Biotechnology Progress , an official, bimonthly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and its technological community, the Society for Biological Engineering, features peer-reviewed research articles, reviews, and descriptions of emerging techniques for the development and design of new processes, products, and devices for the biotechnology, biopharmaceutical and bioprocess industries.
Widespread interest includes application of biological and engineering principles in fields such as applied cellular physiology and metabolic engineering, biocatalysis and bioreactor design, bioseparations and downstream processing, cell culture and tissue engineering, biosensors and process control, bioinformatics and systems biology, biomaterials and artificial organs, stem cell biology and genetics, and plant biology and food science. Manuscripts concerning the design of related processes, products, or devices are also encouraged. Four types of manuscripts are printed in the Journal: Research Papers, Topical or Review Papers, Letters to the Editor, and R & D Notes.