Diagnostic performance of PAPP-A and β-hCG in early detection of gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Maryam Rahimi, Ladan Haghighi, Mostafa Majidnia, Babak Ghadirzadeh, Yousef Moradi
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of PAPP-A and β-hCG in early detection of gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Maryam Rahimi, Ladan Haghighi, Mostafa Majidnia, Babak Ghadirzadeh, Yousef Moradi","doi":"10.1007/s00592-025-02597-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common metabolic disorder that creates considerable risks regarding both maternal and fetal health. Conventional screening approaches for GDM which are typically performed in the late second trimester; frequently miss an important window for early intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis seeks to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of first-trimester maternal serum biomarkers, particularly pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), in the prediction of GDM. This systematic review of observational studies was conducted to assess PAPP-A and/or β-hCG levels during the first trimester, examining their correlation with the subsequent diagnosis of GDM. This meta-analysis collected data from numerous studies to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratios; alongside with developing summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This diagnostic meta-analysis assessed 23 studies encompassing first-trimester PAPP-A and β-hCG measurements with regards to early prediction of GDM. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity were found to be 63% (95% CI: 53-73%) and 70% (95% CI: 61-78%), alongside an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.68-0.76). Substantial heterogeneity was observed regarding both sensitivity and specificity (I² >95%). Unaccompanied PAPP-A showed a sensitivity of 67% (95% CI: 55-77%) and specificity of 66% (95% CI: 54-76%) with AUC of 0.71, while β-hCG alone exhibited low sensitivity of 29% (95% CI: 7-69%) despite a high specificity of 87% (95% CI: 64-96%) with its AUC found to be 0.71. Fagan's analysis revealed modest clinical impact; which was found to be raising post-test probability from 20% to ~ 39% after a positive result. Deek's tests suggested no major publication bias (p = 0.45 for overall, 0.41 for PAPP-A, 0.08 for β-hCG). Subgroup analyses revealed higher sensitivity levels in studies utilizing ADA criteria and in studies with smaller samples, while those with cohort designs generated more conservative estimates upon comparison with their case-control counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>First-trimester PAPP-A and β-hCG are found to express modest diagnostic accuracy and therefore are best considered as adjuncts to early risk stratification regarding GDM. PAPP-A, as stand-alone, provides balanced though moderate levels of sensitivity and specificity, whereas β-hCG shows high specificity levels but very low sensitivity level; thus, limiting its independent predictive value. Neither biomarker is found to be sufficient as a stand-alone diagnostic tool, but both may contribute to comprehensive risk models which might inform timely intervention. Future research should emphasize standardized methodologies and validation in large, diverse populations in order to improve clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":6921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Diabetologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Diabetologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-025-02597-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common metabolic disorder that creates considerable risks regarding both maternal and fetal health. Conventional screening approaches for GDM which are typically performed in the late second trimester; frequently miss an important window for early intervention.

Methods: This meta-analysis seeks to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of first-trimester maternal serum biomarkers, particularly pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), in the prediction of GDM. This systematic review of observational studies was conducted to assess PAPP-A and/or β-hCG levels during the first trimester, examining their correlation with the subsequent diagnosis of GDM. This meta-analysis collected data from numerous studies to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratios; alongside with developing summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves.

Results: This diagnostic meta-analysis assessed 23 studies encompassing first-trimester PAPP-A and β-hCG measurements with regards to early prediction of GDM. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity were found to be 63% (95% CI: 53-73%) and 70% (95% CI: 61-78%), alongside an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.68-0.76). Substantial heterogeneity was observed regarding both sensitivity and specificity (I² >95%). Unaccompanied PAPP-A showed a sensitivity of 67% (95% CI: 55-77%) and specificity of 66% (95% CI: 54-76%) with AUC of 0.71, while β-hCG alone exhibited low sensitivity of 29% (95% CI: 7-69%) despite a high specificity of 87% (95% CI: 64-96%) with its AUC found to be 0.71. Fagan's analysis revealed modest clinical impact; which was found to be raising post-test probability from 20% to ~ 39% after a positive result. Deek's tests suggested no major publication bias (p = 0.45 for overall, 0.41 for PAPP-A, 0.08 for β-hCG). Subgroup analyses revealed higher sensitivity levels in studies utilizing ADA criteria and in studies with smaller samples, while those with cohort designs generated more conservative estimates upon comparison with their case-control counterparts.

Conclusion: First-trimester PAPP-A and β-hCG are found to express modest diagnostic accuracy and therefore are best considered as adjuncts to early risk stratification regarding GDM. PAPP-A, as stand-alone, provides balanced though moderate levels of sensitivity and specificity, whereas β-hCG shows high specificity levels but very low sensitivity level; thus, limiting its independent predictive value. Neither biomarker is found to be sufficient as a stand-alone diagnostic tool, but both may contribute to comprehensive risk models which might inform timely intervention. Future research should emphasize standardized methodologies and validation in large, diverse populations in order to improve clinical applicability.

pap -a和β-hCG在妊娠期糖尿病早期检测中的诊断价值:荟萃分析。
背景:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)是一种常见的代谢性疾病,对母体和胎儿健康都有相当大的风险。GDM的常规筛查方法通常在妊娠中期晚期进行;经常错过早期干预的重要窗口期。方法:本荟萃分析旨在评估妊娠早期母体血清生物标志物,特别是妊娠相关血浆蛋白-a (ppap -a)和β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-hCG)在预测GDM中的诊断准确性。本研究对观察性研究进行了系统回顾,以评估妊娠前三个月的pap - a和/或β-hCG水平,并检查其与随后GDM诊断的相关性。本荟萃分析收集了大量研究的数据,以评估敏感性、特异性、似然比和诊断优势比;同时还开发了接受者工作特征(sROC)曲线。结果:本诊断荟萃分析评估了23项研究,包括孕早期pap -a和β-hCG测量与早期预测GDM的关系。总体合并敏感性和特异性分别为63% (95% CI: 53-73%)和70% (95% CI: 61-78%), AUC为0.72 (95% CI: 0.68-0.76)。在敏感性和特异性方面观察到实质性的异质性(I²>95%)。无伴pap - a的敏感性为67% (95% CI: 55-77%),特异性为66% (95% CI: 54-76%), AUC为0.71,而单独使用β-hCG的敏感性为29% (95% CI: 7-69%),特异性为87% (95% CI: 64-96%), AUC为0.71。Fagan的分析显示临床影响不大;结果发现,在阳性结果后,将后验概率从20%提高到~ 39%。Deek的检验显示没有重大的发表偏倚(总体p = 0.45, PAPP-A p = 0.41, β-hCG p = 0.08)。亚组分析显示,在使用ADA标准的研究和样本较小的研究中,敏感性水平较高,而那些采用队列设计的研究与病例对照研究相比,产生了更保守的估计。结论:发现妊娠早期pap - a和β-hCG的诊断准确性不高,因此最好将其作为GDM早期风险分层的辅助手段。单独使用时,PAPP-A的敏感性和特异性平衡但中等,而β-hCG的特异性较高,但敏感性很低;从而限制了其独立的预测价值。这两种生物标志物都不足以作为单独的诊断工具,但两者都可能有助于建立全面的风险模型,从而为及时干预提供信息。未来的研究应强调标准化的方法和在大量不同人群中的验证,以提高临床适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Diabetologica
Acta Diabetologica 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Acta Diabetologica is a journal that publishes reports of experimental and clinical research on diabetes mellitus and related metabolic diseases. Original contributions on biochemical, physiological, pathophysiological and clinical aspects of research on diabetes and metabolic diseases are welcome. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications and letters to the editor. Invited reviews and editorials are also published. A Methodology forum, which publishes contributions on methodological aspects of diabetes in vivo and in vitro, is also available. The Editor-in-chief will be pleased to consider articles describing new techniques (e.g., new transplantation methods, metabolic models), of innovative importance in the field of diabetes/metabolism. Finally, workshop reports are also welcome in Acta Diabetologica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信