When low is not low enough: zero-fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation using the VARIPULSE™ pulsed field system-a prospective single-center study.

IF 2.6
E Simeon, S Roeun, M Miled, O Villejoubert, P Jorrot, N Mignot, J Durand, A Aissani, F Sebag
{"title":"When low is not low enough: zero-fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation using the VARIPULSE™ pulsed field system-a prospective single-center study.","authors":"E Simeon, S Roeun, M Miled, O Villejoubert, P Jorrot, N Mignot, J Durand, A Aissani, F Sebag","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02162-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a non-thermal, tissue-selective modality for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, potentially minimizing collateral damage to adjacent structures. The VARIPULSE™ PFA system, integrated with the CARTO™ 3 electroanatomical mapping system, facilitates real-time catheter visualization, enabling procedures with minimal or no fluoroscopy. The objective is to evaluate the feasibility and acute safety of performing zero-fluoroscopy AF catheter ablation using the VARIPULSE™ PFA system in a cohort of consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF for 1 year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, single-center study was conducted involving consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation (PVI ± linear ablations) with the VARIPULSE™ system. Procedures were guided exclusively by the CARTO™ 3 system, without the use of fluoroscopy as well as intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). Data on procedural parameters, acute success rates, and complications were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 121 consecutive patients were included in the study during 1 year with 60% of paroxysmal AF. Additional extra-pulmonary vein ablation (CTI or posterior wall isolation or both) was performed in 93 patients (76.9%). The mean time procedure was 44.5 ± 15.2 min and the success rate of zero-fluoroscopy was 98.4%. Two patients had an acute complication (1 TIA and 1 cardiogenic shock).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and time-efficiency of a fully standardized fluoroscopy-free workflow, including posterior wall and CTI ablation. The use of TEE instead of ICE enhances cost-efficiency, potentially facilitating broader adoption of the protocol. However, the single-center nature of the study and the lack of a comparative fluoroscopy group represent important limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02162-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a non-thermal, tissue-selective modality for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, potentially minimizing collateral damage to adjacent structures. The VARIPULSE™ PFA system, integrated with the CARTO™ 3 electroanatomical mapping system, facilitates real-time catheter visualization, enabling procedures with minimal or no fluoroscopy. The objective is to evaluate the feasibility and acute safety of performing zero-fluoroscopy AF catheter ablation using the VARIPULSE™ PFA system in a cohort of consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF for 1 year.

Methods: A prospective, single-center study was conducted involving consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation (PVI ± linear ablations) with the VARIPULSE™ system. Procedures were guided exclusively by the CARTO™ 3 system, without the use of fluoroscopy as well as intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). Data on procedural parameters, acute success rates, and complications were collected and analyzed.

Results: A total of 121 consecutive patients were included in the study during 1 year with 60% of paroxysmal AF. Additional extra-pulmonary vein ablation (CTI or posterior wall isolation or both) was performed in 93 patients (76.9%). The mean time procedure was 44.5 ± 15.2 min and the success rate of zero-fluoroscopy was 98.4%. Two patients had an acute complication (1 TIA and 1 cardiogenic shock).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and time-efficiency of a fully standardized fluoroscopy-free workflow, including posterior wall and CTI ablation. The use of TEE instead of ICE enhances cost-efficiency, potentially facilitating broader adoption of the protocol. However, the single-center nature of the study and the lack of a comparative fluoroscopy group represent important limitations.

当低不够低时:使用VARIPULSE™脉冲场系统的零透视房颤消融-一项前瞻性单中心研究。
背景:脉冲场消融(PFA)已成为心房颤动(AF)治疗中肺静脉隔离(PVI)的一种非热的、组织选择性的方式,可能最大限度地减少对邻近结构的附带损伤。VARIPULSE™PFA系统与CARTO™3电解剖制图系统集成,可实现实时导管可视化,实现极少或无需透视检查的操作。目的是评估使用VARIPULSE™PFA系统对连续1年的阵发性或持续性房颤患者进行无透视房颤导管消融的可行性和急性安全性。方法:一项前瞻性、单中心研究,涉及使用VARIPULSE™系统接受房颤消融(PVI±线性消融)的连续患者。手术完全由CARTO™3系统指导,不使用透视和心内超声心动图(ICE)。收集和分析手术参数、急性成功率和并发症的数据。结果:1年内共有121例连续患者被纳入研究,其中60%为阵发性房颤。93例(76.9%)患者接受了额外的肺外静脉消融(CTI或后壁隔离或两者兼有)。平均手术时间为44.5±15.2 min,零透视成功率为98.4%。2例患者出现急性并发症(1例TIA和心源性休克)。结论:本研究证明了一种完全标准化的无透视工作流程的可行性、安全性和时间效率,包括后壁和CTI消融。使用TEE代替ICE提高了成本效益,可能促进协议的更广泛采用。然而,该研究的单中心性质和缺乏比较透视组代表了重要的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信