E Simeon, S Roeun, M Miled, O Villejoubert, P Jorrot, N Mignot, J Durand, A Aissani, F Sebag
{"title":"When low is not low enough: zero-fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation using the VARIPULSE™ pulsed field system-a prospective single-center study.","authors":"E Simeon, S Roeun, M Miled, O Villejoubert, P Jorrot, N Mignot, J Durand, A Aissani, F Sebag","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02162-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a non-thermal, tissue-selective modality for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, potentially minimizing collateral damage to adjacent structures. The VARIPULSE™ PFA system, integrated with the CARTO™ 3 electroanatomical mapping system, facilitates real-time catheter visualization, enabling procedures with minimal or no fluoroscopy. The objective is to evaluate the feasibility and acute safety of performing zero-fluoroscopy AF catheter ablation using the VARIPULSE™ PFA system in a cohort of consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF for 1 year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, single-center study was conducted involving consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation (PVI ± linear ablations) with the VARIPULSE™ system. Procedures were guided exclusively by the CARTO™ 3 system, without the use of fluoroscopy as well as intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). Data on procedural parameters, acute success rates, and complications were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 121 consecutive patients were included in the study during 1 year with 60% of paroxysmal AF. Additional extra-pulmonary vein ablation (CTI or posterior wall isolation or both) was performed in 93 patients (76.9%). The mean time procedure was 44.5 ± 15.2 min and the success rate of zero-fluoroscopy was 98.4%. Two patients had an acute complication (1 TIA and 1 cardiogenic shock).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and time-efficiency of a fully standardized fluoroscopy-free workflow, including posterior wall and CTI ablation. The use of TEE instead of ICE enhances cost-efficiency, potentially facilitating broader adoption of the protocol. However, the single-center nature of the study and the lack of a comparative fluoroscopy group represent important limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02162-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a non-thermal, tissue-selective modality for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, potentially minimizing collateral damage to adjacent structures. The VARIPULSE™ PFA system, integrated with the CARTO™ 3 electroanatomical mapping system, facilitates real-time catheter visualization, enabling procedures with minimal or no fluoroscopy. The objective is to evaluate the feasibility and acute safety of performing zero-fluoroscopy AF catheter ablation using the VARIPULSE™ PFA system in a cohort of consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF for 1 year.
Methods: A prospective, single-center study was conducted involving consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation (PVI ± linear ablations) with the VARIPULSE™ system. Procedures were guided exclusively by the CARTO™ 3 system, without the use of fluoroscopy as well as intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). Data on procedural parameters, acute success rates, and complications were collected and analyzed.
Results: A total of 121 consecutive patients were included in the study during 1 year with 60% of paroxysmal AF. Additional extra-pulmonary vein ablation (CTI or posterior wall isolation or both) was performed in 93 patients (76.9%). The mean time procedure was 44.5 ± 15.2 min and the success rate of zero-fluoroscopy was 98.4%. Two patients had an acute complication (1 TIA and 1 cardiogenic shock).
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and time-efficiency of a fully standardized fluoroscopy-free workflow, including posterior wall and CTI ablation. The use of TEE instead of ICE enhances cost-efficiency, potentially facilitating broader adoption of the protocol. However, the single-center nature of the study and the lack of a comparative fluoroscopy group represent important limitations.