Cancer Interception During Treatment: Using Growth Kinetics to Create a Continuous Variable for Assessing Disease Response.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-10-22 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf353
Mengxi Zhou, Antonion T Fojo, Lawrence H Schwartz, Susan E Bates, Krastan B Blagoev
{"title":"Cancer Interception During Treatment: Using Growth Kinetics to Create a Continuous Variable for Assessing Disease Response.","authors":"Mengxi Zhou, Antonion T Fojo, Lawrence H Schwartz, Susan E Bates, Krastan B Blagoev","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We applied 11 mathematical models of tumor growth to clinical trial data available from public and private sources. We have previously described the remarkable capacity for a simple biexponential model to describe the kinetics of tumor growth, fit thousands of datasets, and correlate with overall survival. We sought to extend our analysis to additional tumor types and to evaluate whether alternate growth models could describe the time course of disease burden in the small subset of patients in whom the biexponential model failed.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data were available from 17,140 patients including imaging data for 3,346 patients and serum levels of tumor markers for 13,794 patients. Data from patients were analyzed using the biexponential model to determine rates of tumor growth (g) and regression (d); for those whose data could not be described by this model, fit of their data was assessed using seven alternative models. The rates of tumor growth (g rate), a continuous variable, were examined for association with the gold-standard of clinical trials, overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As we have previously reported, data from most patients fit a simple model of exponential growth and exponential regression (86%). Data from another 7% of patients fit an alternative model. We found growth rate correlates inversely with overall survival, remarkably even when data from various histologies are considered together. For patients with multiple timepoints of tumor measurement, growth rate could often be estimated even during the phase when only net regression could be discerned.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Validation of a simple mathematical model across different cancers and its application to existing clinical data allowed estimation of the rate of growth of a treatment resistant subpopulation of cancer cells. The quantification of available clinical data using the growth rate of tumors in individual patients and its strong correlation with overall survival makes the growth rate an excellent marker of the efficacy of therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We applied 11 mathematical models of tumor growth to clinical trial data available from public and private sources. We have previously described the remarkable capacity for a simple biexponential model to describe the kinetics of tumor growth, fit thousands of datasets, and correlate with overall survival. We sought to extend our analysis to additional tumor types and to evaluate whether alternate growth models could describe the time course of disease burden in the small subset of patients in whom the biexponential model failed.

Patients and methods: Data were available from 17,140 patients including imaging data for 3,346 patients and serum levels of tumor markers for 13,794 patients. Data from patients were analyzed using the biexponential model to determine rates of tumor growth (g) and regression (d); for those whose data could not be described by this model, fit of their data was assessed using seven alternative models. The rates of tumor growth (g rate), a continuous variable, were examined for association with the gold-standard of clinical trials, overall survival.

Results: As we have previously reported, data from most patients fit a simple model of exponential growth and exponential regression (86%). Data from another 7% of patients fit an alternative model. We found growth rate correlates inversely with overall survival, remarkably even when data from various histologies are considered together. For patients with multiple timepoints of tumor measurement, growth rate could often be estimated even during the phase when only net regression could be discerned.

Conclusions: Validation of a simple mathematical model across different cancers and its application to existing clinical data allowed estimation of the rate of growth of a treatment resistant subpopulation of cancer cells. The quantification of available clinical data using the growth rate of tumors in individual patients and its strong correlation with overall survival makes the growth rate an excellent marker of the efficacy of therapy.

治疗期间的癌症拦截:使用生长动力学创建评估疾病反应的连续变量。
背景:我们将11种肿瘤生长的数学模型应用于来自公共和私人来源的临床试验数据。我们之前已经描述了简单的双指数模型描述肿瘤生长动力学的非凡能力,适合数千个数据集,并与总体生存相关。我们试图将我们的分析扩展到其他肿瘤类型,并评估替代生长模型是否可以描述双指数模型失败的一小部分患者的疾病负担的时间过程。患者和方法:数据来自17,140例患者,包括3,346例患者的影像学数据和13,794例患者的血清肿瘤标志物水平。采用双指数模型分析患者数据,确定肿瘤生长速率(g)和回归速率(d);对于那些数据不能用这个模型描述的人,他们的数据的拟合使用七个替代模型进行评估。肿瘤生长速率(g率),一个连续变量,被检查与临床试验的黄金标准,总生存。结果:正如我们之前报道的那样,大多数患者的数据符合指数增长和指数回归的简单模型(86%)。另外7%患者的数据符合另一种模式。我们发现生长率与总生存率呈负相关,即使将不同组织学的数据放在一起考虑也是如此。对于有多个肿瘤测量时间点的患者,即使在只有净回归的阶段,也往往可以估计出生长速度。结论:在不同癌症中验证一个简单的数学模型,并将其应用于现有的临床数据,可以估计癌细胞治疗耐药亚群的生长速度。利用个体患者肿瘤生长速度及其与总生存期的强相关性对现有临床数据进行量化,使生长速度成为治疗效果的极好标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信