Barriers to Effective Perioperative Handoffs: An Interview-Based Qualitative Descriptive Study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rathnayaka M Kalpanee D Gunasingha, McKenzie O'Brien, Matthew Lutynski, Bryan Spear, Rachell Allnutt, Jennifer Hepps, Adrian Mora, Jeremy Nelson, Michele Gage, Candy Wilson, Clifton Yu
{"title":"Barriers to Effective Perioperative Handoffs: An Interview-Based Qualitative Descriptive Study.","authors":"Rathnayaka M Kalpanee D Gunasingha, McKenzie O'Brien, Matthew Lutynski, Bryan Spear, Rachell Allnutt, Jennifer Hepps, Adrian Mora, Jeremy Nelson, Michele Gage, Candy Wilson, Clifton Yu","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Miscommunication is the leading cause of hospital medical error, most occurring during patient care handoffs. Even with successful implementation of a standardized handoff methodology, our hospital experienced continued handoff problems in the perioperative space. No studies have yet examined barriers to effective perioperative handoff communication.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to identify and understand the barriers to effective perioperative handoffs that persist despite quality improvement efforts to improve handoff communication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We initiated a qualitative study using thematic analysis of semistructured face-to-face interviews with nurses and physicians from perioperative units. Interviews were coded into themes and then categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The barriers were categorized into administration, communication, and personnel. Administration involves knowledge and interpretation of administrative processes. Communication refers to forms and components of handoff communication and the environment where handoffs occur. Personnel refers to individual roles and responsibilities, and also as a quantitative resource. Specific quality improvement initiatives were proposed based on our study results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that successful handoff communication between perioperative areas requires identification of critical administrative, communication, and personnel barriers.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Hospitals can conduct similar interview-based studies to discover barriers to effective handoffs, and implement policies and procedures to improve safety in the perioperative space.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Miscommunication is the leading cause of hospital medical error, most occurring during patient care handoffs. Even with successful implementation of a standardized handoff methodology, our hospital experienced continued handoff problems in the perioperative space. No studies have yet examined barriers to effective perioperative handoff communication.

Purpose: This study aims to identify and understand the barriers to effective perioperative handoffs that persist despite quality improvement efforts to improve handoff communication.

Methods: We initiated a qualitative study using thematic analysis of semistructured face-to-face interviews with nurses and physicians from perioperative units. Interviews were coded into themes and then categories.

Results: The barriers were categorized into administration, communication, and personnel. Administration involves knowledge and interpretation of administrative processes. Communication refers to forms and components of handoff communication and the environment where handoffs occur. Personnel refers to individual roles and responsibilities, and also as a quantitative resource. Specific quality improvement initiatives were proposed based on our study results.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that successful handoff communication between perioperative areas requires identification of critical administrative, communication, and personnel barriers.

Implications: Hospitals can conduct similar interview-based studies to discover barriers to effective handoffs, and implement policies and procedures to improve safety in the perioperative space.

围手术期有效交接的障碍:一项基于访谈的定性描述性研究。
背景:沟通不端是医院医疗差错的主要原因,大多数发生在病人护理交接期间。即使成功实施了标准化的交接方法,我们医院在围手术期仍然遇到了持续的交接问题。目前还没有研究检查围手术期有效交接沟通的障碍。目的:本研究旨在识别和理解有效的围手术期交接的障碍,尽管质量改进努力改善交接沟通,但这些障碍仍然存在。方法:我们对围手术期病房的护士和医生进行了半结构化的面对面访谈,并采用主题分析进行了定性研究。采访被编码成主题,然后分类。结果:主要障碍为管理障碍、沟通障碍和人员障碍。行政管理涉及对行政程序的了解和解释。沟通是指交接沟通的形式和组成,以及交接发生的环境。人员是指个人的角色和职责,也是一种定量的资源。根据我们的研究结果提出了具体的质量改进措施。结论:我们的研究结果表明围手术期区域之间成功的交接沟通需要识别关键的管理、沟通和人员障碍。意义:医院可以进行类似的基于访谈的研究,以发现有效交接的障碍,并实施政策和程序,以提高围手术期空间的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信