An assessment of dental care quality and patient experience in Yerevan, Armenia.

IF 2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Marine Mkrtchyan, Lisle Hites, Irina Papieva, Michael E Thompson
{"title":"An assessment of dental care quality and patient experience in Yerevan, Armenia.","authors":"Marine Mkrtchyan, Lisle Hites, Irina Papieva, Michael E Thompson","doi":"10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2025-0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patient experience is a key component of quality of care. This study assessed patient experiences of dental care in Armenia, identifying associated factors and gaps between patients' expectations and care provided.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 164 dental patients from seven randomly selected dental clinics in Yerevan's seven largest districts. A self-administered questionnaire assessed patient experience and Patient Experience Scores (PES, range 1-5) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 164 respondents (response rate 83%) with mean age of 42 years completed the questionnaire. Overall satisfaction with the last visit was rated \"excellent\" by 52% (n = 86) patients, \"good\" by 34% (n = 56) and \"poor-fair\" by 13% (n = 21). The overall mean PES was 3.92. \"Respect,\" \"Pain management\" and \"Safety\" were scored highest, indicating that they are the most valued aspects of care. The lowest scores were observed in \"General satisfaction,\" \"Privacy\" and \"Quality of care.\" Most domains (9 of 11) were positively correlated with PES. Increasing age was associated with lower PES (OR 0.98 per year), and higher standard of living with higher PES (3.17 average, 5.64 above average as compared to below average). The single \"General Satisfaction\" item averaged less than 3.0 and did not track with the other PES domains, a concern since the single item is often used in place of the full scale.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>The concept of patient experience is complex. This first study of dental patient experience in Armenia provides a foundation for further research, including benchmarking and other efforts that will drive quality improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47455,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","volume":" ","pages":"56-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2025-0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patient experience is a key component of quality of care. This study assessed patient experiences of dental care in Armenia, identifying associated factors and gaps between patients' expectations and care provided.

Design/methodology/approach: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 164 dental patients from seven randomly selected dental clinics in Yerevan's seven largest districts. A self-administered questionnaire assessed patient experience and Patient Experience Scores (PES, range 1-5) were calculated.

Findings: A total of 164 respondents (response rate 83%) with mean age of 42 years completed the questionnaire. Overall satisfaction with the last visit was rated "excellent" by 52% (n = 86) patients, "good" by 34% (n = 56) and "poor-fair" by 13% (n = 21). The overall mean PES was 3.92. "Respect," "Pain management" and "Safety" were scored highest, indicating that they are the most valued aspects of care. The lowest scores were observed in "General satisfaction," "Privacy" and "Quality of care." Most domains (9 of 11) were positively correlated with PES. Increasing age was associated with lower PES (OR 0.98 per year), and higher standard of living with higher PES (3.17 average, 5.64 above average as compared to below average). The single "General Satisfaction" item averaged less than 3.0 and did not track with the other PES domains, a concern since the single item is often used in place of the full scale.

Originality/value: The concept of patient experience is complex. This first study of dental patient experience in Armenia provides a foundation for further research, including benchmarking and other efforts that will drive quality improvement.

亚美尼亚埃里温的牙科护理质量和患者经验评估。
目的:患者体验是护理质量的关键组成部分。本研究评估了亚美尼亚患者的牙科护理经历,确定了患者期望和提供的护理之间的相关因素和差距。设计/方法/方法:我们对埃里温七个最大地区随机选择的七个牙科诊所的164名牙科患者进行了横断面调查。采用自我管理问卷评估患者体验,并计算患者体验评分(PES,范围1-5)。调查结果:共有164名受访者(回复率83%)完成问卷调查,平均年龄42岁。52% (n = 86)患者对上次就诊的总体满意度为“优秀”,34% (n = 56)为“良好”,13% (n = 21)为“一般”。总平均PES为3.92。“尊重”、“疼痛管理”和“安全”得分最高,表明它们是护理中最受重视的方面。得分最低的是“总体满意度”、“隐私”和“护理质量”。多数域(9 / 11)与PES呈正相关。年龄增加与较低的PES相关(OR为每年0.98),较高的生活水平与较高的PES相关(平均值3.17,高于平均值5.64,低于平均值5.64)。单一的“一般满意度”项目平均低于3.0,并且与其他PES领域不一致,这是一个值得关注的问题,因为单一的项目经常被用来代替完整的量表。独创性/价值:患者体验的概念是复杂的。亚美尼亚牙科患者经验的首次研究为进一步研究提供了基础,包括基准和其他将推动质量改进的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: ■Successful quality/continuous improvement projects ■The use of quality tools and models in leadership management development such as the EFQM Excellence Model, Balanced Scorecard, Quality Standards, Managed Care ■Issues relating to process control such as Six Sigma, Leadership, Managing Change and Process Mapping ■Improving patient care through quality related programmes and/or research Articles that use quantitative and qualitative methods are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书