Disparity between capacity and performance in the International Classification of Functioning: implications for functionality in older adults.

IF 4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
AIMS Public Health Pub Date : 2025-08-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3934/publichealth.2025040
María Cristina Ruiz-Garrós, Ana Alejandra Laborda Soriano, Alba Cambra-Aliaga, Pilar Dominguez-Oliván, Marta Perez-de-Heredia-Torres, Laura Gonzalo-Ciria, Ana Gascón-Catalán
{"title":"Disparity between capacity and performance in the International Classification of Functioning: implications for functionality in older adults.","authors":"María Cristina Ruiz-Garrós, Ana Alejandra Laborda Soriano, Alba Cambra-Aliaga, Pilar Dominguez-Oliván, Marta Perez-de-Heredia-Torres, Laura Gonzalo-Ciria, Ana Gascón-Catalán","doi":"10.3934/publichealth.2025040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functioning, recognized as the third health indicator and a key metric for rehabilitation, can be assessed by measuring capacity and performance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify the prevalence of disability and cognitive impairment in individuals aged 50+ and evaluate the reliability and clinical relevance of capacity and performance qualifiers in the activity and participation domains of the international classification of functioning checklist (ICF checklist).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in a population from rural and urban areas of Aragón (Spain), including 1707 participants. Disability and cognitive impairment were assessed using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 12-item version (WHODAS 12) and mini-mental state examination. A randomly selected subsample (n = 129) underwent a detailed functional evaluation. The ICF checklist was used to compare capacity and performance, analyzing their agreement and differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Disability was present in 50.6% of participants. Severe or total disability was most prevalent in general tasks/demands (10.1%) and domestic life (7.1%), reflecting significant daily functioning limitations. The largest capacity-performance discrepancies were in domestic life, self-care, and learning, indicating key intervention areas. Notably, 40.5% of participants had lower performance in domestic life, followed by learning/knowledge (28%) and mobility (17%). Conversely, performance exceeded capacity in community living (13.3%) and personal relationships (5.5%), highlighting the influence of environmental factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disability is highly prevalent in adults aged 50+, notably affecting daily functioning. Gaps between ability and performance indicate environmental barriers, especially at home and in learning contexts. Improved outcomes in social domains suggest enabling conditions. Findings support the ICF checklist's clinical value and advocate for integrating environmental factors into disability care.</p>","PeriodicalId":45684,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Public Health","volume":"12 3","pages":"796-811"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12538239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2025040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Functioning, recognized as the third health indicator and a key metric for rehabilitation, can be assessed by measuring capacity and performance.

Objective: To quantify the prevalence of disability and cognitive impairment in individuals aged 50+ and evaluate the reliability and clinical relevance of capacity and performance qualifiers in the activity and participation domains of the international classification of functioning checklist (ICF checklist).

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a population from rural and urban areas of Aragón (Spain), including 1707 participants. Disability and cognitive impairment were assessed using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 12-item version (WHODAS 12) and mini-mental state examination. A randomly selected subsample (n = 129) underwent a detailed functional evaluation. The ICF checklist was used to compare capacity and performance, analyzing their agreement and differences.

Results: Disability was present in 50.6% of participants. Severe or total disability was most prevalent in general tasks/demands (10.1%) and domestic life (7.1%), reflecting significant daily functioning limitations. The largest capacity-performance discrepancies were in domestic life, self-care, and learning, indicating key intervention areas. Notably, 40.5% of participants had lower performance in domestic life, followed by learning/knowledge (28%) and mobility (17%). Conversely, performance exceeded capacity in community living (13.3%) and personal relationships (5.5%), highlighting the influence of environmental factors.

Conclusions: Disability is highly prevalent in adults aged 50+, notably affecting daily functioning. Gaps between ability and performance indicate environmental barriers, especially at home and in learning contexts. Improved outcomes in social domains suggest enabling conditions. Findings support the ICF checklist's clinical value and advocate for integrating environmental factors into disability care.

国际功能分类中能力与表现的差异:对老年人功能的影响。
背景:功能被认为是第三个健康指标和康复的关键指标,可以通过衡量能力和绩效来评估。目的:量化50岁以上人群残疾和认知障碍的患病率,评估国际功能分类检查表(ICF)活动和参与领域的能力和表现限定词的可靠性和临床相关性。方法:在Aragón(西班牙)的农村和城市地区进行了一项横断面研究,包括1707名参与者。采用世界卫生组织残疾评估表12项版本(WHODAS 12)和简易精神状态检查评估残疾和认知障碍。随机选择一个子样本(n = 129)进行详细的功能评估。ICF检查表用于比较容量和性能,分析它们的一致和差异。结果:50.6%的参与者存在残疾。严重或完全残疾在一般工作/需求(10.1%)和家庭生活(7.1%)中最为普遍,反映出严重的日常功能限制。能力-绩效差异最大的是家庭生活、自我照顾和学习,这表明了重点干预领域。值得注意的是,40.5%的参与者在家庭生活方面表现较差,其次是学习/知识(28%)和流动性(17%)。相反,在社区生活(13.3%)和个人关系(5.5%)中,绩效超过容量,突出了环境因素的影响。结论:残疾在50岁以上的成年人中非常普遍,明显影响日常功能。能力和表现之间的差距表明环境障碍,特别是在家庭和学习环境中。社会领域成果的改善表明了有利条件。研究结果支持ICF检查表的临床价值,并提倡将环境因素纳入残疾护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIMS Public Health
AIMS Public Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书