To Recommend or Not to Recommend: Designing and Evaluating AI-Enabled Decision Support for Time-Critical Medical Events.

Q1 Social Sciences
Angela Mastrianni, Mary Suhyun Kim, Travis M Sullivan, Genevieve Jayne Sippel, Randall S Burd, Krzysztof Z Gajos, Aleksandra Sarcevic
{"title":"To Recommend or Not to Recommend: Designing and Evaluating AI-Enabled Decision Support for Time-Critical Medical Events.","authors":"Angela Mastrianni, Mary Suhyun Kim, Travis M Sullivan, Genevieve Jayne Sippel, Randall S Burd, Krzysztof Z Gajos, Aleksandra Sarcevic","doi":"10.1145/3757512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AI-enabled decision-support systems aim to help medical providers rapidly make decisions with limited information during medical emergencies. A critical challenge in developing these systems is supporting providers in interpreting the system output to make optimal treatment decisions. In this study, we designed and evaluated an AI-enabled decision-support system to aid providers in treating patients with traumatic injuries. We first conducted user research with physicians to identify and design information types and AI outputs for a decision-support display. We then conducted an online experiment with 35 medical providers from six health systems to evaluate two human-AI interaction strategies: (1) AI information synthesis and (2) AI information and recommendations. We found that providers were more likely to make correct decisions when AI information and recommendations were provided compared to receiving no AI support. We also identified two socio-technical barriers to providing AI recommendations during time-critical medical events: (1) an accuracy-time trade-off in providing recommendations and (2) polarizing perceptions of recommendations between providers. We discuss three implications for developing AI-enabled decision support used in time-critical events, contributing to the limited research on human-AI interaction in this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":36902,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"9 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12536412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3757512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI-enabled decision-support systems aim to help medical providers rapidly make decisions with limited information during medical emergencies. A critical challenge in developing these systems is supporting providers in interpreting the system output to make optimal treatment decisions. In this study, we designed and evaluated an AI-enabled decision-support system to aid providers in treating patients with traumatic injuries. We first conducted user research with physicians to identify and design information types and AI outputs for a decision-support display. We then conducted an online experiment with 35 medical providers from six health systems to evaluate two human-AI interaction strategies: (1) AI information synthesis and (2) AI information and recommendations. We found that providers were more likely to make correct decisions when AI information and recommendations were provided compared to receiving no AI support. We also identified two socio-technical barriers to providing AI recommendations during time-critical medical events: (1) an accuracy-time trade-off in providing recommendations and (2) polarizing perceptions of recommendations between providers. We discuss three implications for developing AI-enabled decision support used in time-critical events, contributing to the limited research on human-AI interaction in this context.

推荐还是不推荐:为时间关键型医疗事件设计和评估人工智能支持的决策支持。
支持人工智能的决策支持系统旨在帮助医疗提供者在医疗紧急情况下利用有限的信息快速做出决策。开发这些系统的一个关键挑战是支持提供者解释系统输出以做出最佳治疗决策。在这项研究中,我们设计并评估了一个人工智能支持的决策支持系统,以帮助提供者治疗创伤性损伤患者。我们首先与医生进行了用户研究,以确定和设计决策支持显示的信息类型和人工智能输出。然后,我们对来自6个卫生系统的35名医疗服务提供者进行了在线实验,以评估两种人类-人工智能交互策略:(1)人工智能信息合成和(2)人工智能信息和推荐。我们发现,与没有人工智能支持相比,在提供人工智能信息和建议时,提供者更有可能做出正确的决策。我们还确定了在时间紧迫的医疗事件中提供人工智能建议的两个社会技术障碍:(1)提供建议时的准确性和时间权衡;(2)提供者之间对建议的两极分化看法。我们讨论了在时间关键事件中开发人工智能支持决策支持的三个含义,有助于在此背景下对人类-人工智能交互的有限研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
257
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书