The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Clinical and Laboratory Biomarkers in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.
Zahra Khatirnamani, Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki, Behzad Heidari, Ahmad Sohrabi
{"title":"The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Clinical and Laboratory Biomarkers in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.","authors":"Zahra Khatirnamani, Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki, Behzad Heidari, Ahmad Sohrabi","doi":"10.31138/mjr.090725.lar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is recognised as an inflammatory condition. Evidence indicates that vitamin D modulates inflammation by influencing diverse immune cells. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of vitamin D as a supplement for RA in comparison to a control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases through March 2025 using targeted search terms. Our inclusion criteria encompassed clinical studies that enrolled RA patients and compared vitamin D supplementation against either placebo or standard care protocols. The results from the chosen studies were reported as Standardised mean differences (SMD) using random effect model with a 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vitamin D supplementation resulted in a significant improvement in the VAS [SMD = -1.54, 95% CI (-2.53, -0.55), P = 0.002], serum vitamin D level [SMD = 1.52, 95% CI (0.86, 2.17), P = 0.001] and CRP [SMD = -0.88, 95% CI (-1.31, -0.44), P =0.001] but not in other outcomes. There was considerable heterogeneity among the studies for VAS (I<sup>2</sup> = 97.4%, P = 0.001), DAS28 (I<sup>2</sup> = 89.1%, P = 0.001), serum vitamin D Levels (I<sup>2</sup> = 94.7%, P = 0.001), CRP (I<sup>2</sup> = 84.1%, P = 0.001), and ESR (I<sup>2</sup> = 84.1%, P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intervention groups receiving vitamin D supplementation showed statistically significant improvements in serum vitamin D levels, visual analog scale VAS scores, and CRP levels compared to control groups among RA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":32816,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"36 3","pages":"428-439"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12536741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31138/mjr.090725.lar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is recognised as an inflammatory condition. Evidence indicates that vitamin D modulates inflammation by influencing diverse immune cells. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of vitamin D as a supplement for RA in comparison to a control group.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases through March 2025 using targeted search terms. Our inclusion criteria encompassed clinical studies that enrolled RA patients and compared vitamin D supplementation against either placebo or standard care protocols. The results from the chosen studies were reported as Standardised mean differences (SMD) using random effect model with a 95% confidence interval.
Results: Vitamin D supplementation resulted in a significant improvement in the VAS [SMD = -1.54, 95% CI (-2.53, -0.55), P = 0.002], serum vitamin D level [SMD = 1.52, 95% CI (0.86, 2.17), P = 0.001] and CRP [SMD = -0.88, 95% CI (-1.31, -0.44), P =0.001] but not in other outcomes. There was considerable heterogeneity among the studies for VAS (I2 = 97.4%, P = 0.001), DAS28 (I2 = 89.1%, P = 0.001), serum vitamin D Levels (I2 = 94.7%, P = 0.001), CRP (I2 = 84.1%, P = 0.001), and ESR (I2 = 84.1%, P = 0.001).
Conclusion: The intervention groups receiving vitamin D supplementation showed statistically significant improvements in serum vitamin D levels, visual analog scale VAS scores, and CRP levels compared to control groups among RA patients.
目的:类风湿关节炎(RA)被认为是一种炎症性疾病。有证据表明,维生素D通过影响多种免疫细胞来调节炎症。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估维生素D作为RA补充剂的有效性,并与对照组进行比较。方法:我们使用目标搜索词检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science数据库,检索时间截止到2025年3月。我们的纳入标准包括纳入RA患者的临床研究,并将维生素D补充剂与安慰剂或标准治疗方案进行比较。所选研究的结果采用随机效应模型,以95%置信区间的标准化平均差异(SMD)报告。结果:补充维生素D可显著改善VAS [SMD = -1.54, 95% CI (-2.53, -0.55), P = 0.002]、血清维生素D水平[SMD = 1.52, 95% CI (0.86, 2.17), P =0.001]和CRP [SMD = -0.88, 95% CI (-1.31, -0.44), P =0.001],但其他结果无显著改善。VAS (I2 = 97.4%, P = 0.001)、DAS28 (I2 = 89.1%, P = 0.001)、血清维生素D水平(I2 = 94.7%, P = 0.001)、CRP (I2 = 84.1%, P = 0.001)和ESR (I2 = 84.1%, P = 0.001)的研究存在相当大的异质性。结论:与对照组相比,补充维生素D干预组RA患者血清维生素D水平、视觉模拟量表VAS评分和CRP水平均有统计学意义的改善。