Single or double suture-based devices with additional endovascular plug for vascular closure after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Alessandro Comis, Giuliano Costa, Elena Dipietro, Valentina Frittitta, Sofia Sammartino, Mariachiara Calì, Luigi LA Rosa, Alessia Giaquinta, Pierfrancesco Veroux, Corrado Tamburino, Marco Barbanti
{"title":"Single or double suture-based devices with additional endovascular plug for vascular closure after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.","authors":"Alessandro Comis, Giuliano Costa, Elena Dipietro, Valentina Frittitta, Sofia Sammartino, Mariachiara Calì, Luigi LA Rosa, Alessia Giaquinta, Pierfrancesco Veroux, Corrado Tamburino, Marco Barbanti","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5683.25.06859-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Procedure-related vascular and bleeding complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) still represents an important issue that impact on patients' mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of single or double suture-based devices (SBDs) combined with a plug-based device to obtain large bore arteriotomy hemostasis after transfemoral (TF) TAVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with available preprocedural computed tomography angiography (CTA) assessment undergoing 14Fr TF-TAVI from February 2018 to May 2023 at our Institution were considered. Patient receiving single or double SBD combined with a plug-based device were compared after propensity score matching. The primary outcomes were major vascular complications and type 2 to 4 bleeding due to endovascular closure system failure according VARC-3 criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among a total of 490 patients, 130 matched pairs of patients were compared. At 30 days, there was no difference in major vascular complications (0.0% vs. 2.3%, P=0.25) and in type 2 to 4 bleedings (4.6% vs. 6.2%, P=0.78) between two matched groups. No difference in 30-day (1.5% vs. 3.8%, P=0.45) and one-year (12.0% vs. 9.5%, P=0.60) all-cause death was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A simpler strategy with single SBD had comparable safety and effectiveness to the use of double SBD when combined to a plug-base device after 14 Fr TF-TAVI.</p>","PeriodicalId":18668,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5683.25.06859-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Procedure-related vascular and bleeding complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) still represents an important issue that impact on patients' mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of single or double suture-based devices (SBDs) combined with a plug-based device to obtain large bore arteriotomy hemostasis after transfemoral (TF) TAVI.

Methods: Consecutive patients with available preprocedural computed tomography angiography (CTA) assessment undergoing 14Fr TF-TAVI from February 2018 to May 2023 at our Institution were considered. Patient receiving single or double SBD combined with a plug-based device were compared after propensity score matching. The primary outcomes were major vascular complications and type 2 to 4 bleeding due to endovascular closure system failure according VARC-3 criteria.

Results: Among a total of 490 patients, 130 matched pairs of patients were compared. At 30 days, there was no difference in major vascular complications (0.0% vs. 2.3%, P=0.25) and in type 2 to 4 bleedings (4.6% vs. 6.2%, P=0.78) between two matched groups. No difference in 30-day (1.5% vs. 3.8%, P=0.45) and one-year (12.0% vs. 9.5%, P=0.60) all-cause death was observed.

Conclusions: A simpler strategy with single SBD had comparable safety and effectiveness to the use of double SBD when combined to a plug-base device after 14 Fr TF-TAVI.

经股动脉主动脉瓣植入术后,单缝合线或双缝合线装置附加血管内塞用于血管闭合。
背景:经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后与手术相关的血管和出血并发症仍然是影响患者死亡率和发病率的重要问题。本研究的目的是比较单缝线装置(sbd)或双缝线装置(sbd)联合塞式装置在经股动脉TAVI (TF)后获得大口径动脉切开止血的有效性。方法:纳入2018年2月至2023年5月在我院接受14Fr TF-TAVI的术前ct血管造影(CTA)评估的连续患者。在倾向评分匹配后,对接受单次或双次SBD联合插入式装置的患者进行比较。根据VARC-3标准,主要结局是主要血管并发症和血管内关闭系统失败导致的2至4型出血。结果:在490例患者中,共比较了130对匹配的患者。30天时,两组主要血管并发症(0.0% vs. 2.3%, P=0.25)和2 ~ 4型出血(4.6% vs. 6.2%, P=0.78)无差异。30天(1.5% vs. 3.8%, P=0.45)和1年(12.0% vs. 9.5%, P=0.60)全因死亡率无差异。结论:在14 Fr TF-TAVI后,单SBD的简单策略与双SBD联合塞基装置的安全性和有效性相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva cardiology and angiology
Minerva cardiology and angiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书