A retrospective evaluation of the BIOFIRE FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panel for the detection of pathogenic yeasts.

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Emily Puumala, Noelle H Adler, Sharon M Deml, Nancy L Wengenack
{"title":"A retrospective evaluation of the BIOFIRE FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panel for the detection of pathogenic yeasts.","authors":"Emily Puumala, Noelle H Adler, Sharon M Deml, Nancy L Wengenack","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.02258-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by opportunistic yeasts, namely those of the genus <i>Candida</i>, demonstrate strikingly high mortality rates and require early therapeutic intervention to optimize patient outcomes. Advancements in microbiological diagnosis of BSIs have introduced rapid molecular methods, including multiplex PCR panels, to detect common organisms directly from blood culture media. The BIOFIRE FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) assay is one such method and detects seven of the most common yeast species responsible for fungemia, enabling timelier therapeutic optimization by clinicians. Here, we evaluated the clinical performance of BCID2 for yeast identification from positive blood cultures between 2021 and 2025 at a tertiary medical center, compared to the reference standard method, which couples subculturing and diagnostic mass spectrometry. A total of 252 individual yeast identification events were confirmed using the reference method during our study period, 33 (13%) of which represent organisms that lack BCID2 PCR-based targets and 219 (87%) represent organisms targeted by this assay. Of the 219 identifications compatible with the BCID2 panel targets, 209 (95%) were correctly identified. Discordance between BCID2 and the reference method commonly stemmed from the inability of BCID2 to target all yeasts encountered clinically in blood culture, as well as its reduced accuracy in cultures where >1 yeast is present. Overall, these data suggest that the BCID2 assay is a rapid and accurate method to identify the most common organisms causing yeast BSI from blood culture; however, subculture-based reference techniques are important complementary tools in the clinical microbiology laboratory.IMPORTANCEInvasive fungal diseases, including bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by yeasts, are increasing in prevalence alongside the growing global population of immunocompromised individuals. Prompt and targeted treatment is necessary for effective management of yeast BSI, and microbiological diagnostics play an important role in tailoring patient treatment. Rapid molecular assays that simultaneously detect multiple pathogens associated with a specific syndrome are attractive strategies to expedite pathogen identification. This includes the BIOFIRE FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) assay, which detects 33 organisms including 7 yeasts commonly associated with fungemia, directly from blood culture media. Its performance has been well established for the detection of bacteria and bacterial resistance markers from blood cultures. Here, we provide a yeast-specific snapshot into the microbiological performance of BCID2, highlighting its accuracy as well as limitations in detecting medically important yeasts compared to standard culture-based identification from a four-year specimen cohort collected in a tertiary care hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0225825"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02258-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by opportunistic yeasts, namely those of the genus Candida, demonstrate strikingly high mortality rates and require early therapeutic intervention to optimize patient outcomes. Advancements in microbiological diagnosis of BSIs have introduced rapid molecular methods, including multiplex PCR panels, to detect common organisms directly from blood culture media. The BIOFIRE FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) assay is one such method and detects seven of the most common yeast species responsible for fungemia, enabling timelier therapeutic optimization by clinicians. Here, we evaluated the clinical performance of BCID2 for yeast identification from positive blood cultures between 2021 and 2025 at a tertiary medical center, compared to the reference standard method, which couples subculturing and diagnostic mass spectrometry. A total of 252 individual yeast identification events were confirmed using the reference method during our study period, 33 (13%) of which represent organisms that lack BCID2 PCR-based targets and 219 (87%) represent organisms targeted by this assay. Of the 219 identifications compatible with the BCID2 panel targets, 209 (95%) were correctly identified. Discordance between BCID2 and the reference method commonly stemmed from the inability of BCID2 to target all yeasts encountered clinically in blood culture, as well as its reduced accuracy in cultures where >1 yeast is present. Overall, these data suggest that the BCID2 assay is a rapid and accurate method to identify the most common organisms causing yeast BSI from blood culture; however, subculture-based reference techniques are important complementary tools in the clinical microbiology laboratory.IMPORTANCEInvasive fungal diseases, including bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by yeasts, are increasing in prevalence alongside the growing global population of immunocompromised individuals. Prompt and targeted treatment is necessary for effective management of yeast BSI, and microbiological diagnostics play an important role in tailoring patient treatment. Rapid molecular assays that simultaneously detect multiple pathogens associated with a specific syndrome are attractive strategies to expedite pathogen identification. This includes the BIOFIRE FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) assay, which detects 33 organisms including 7 yeasts commonly associated with fungemia, directly from blood culture media. Its performance has been well established for the detection of bacteria and bacterial resistance markers from blood cultures. Here, we provide a yeast-specific snapshot into the microbiological performance of BCID2, highlighting its accuracy as well as limitations in detecting medically important yeasts compared to standard culture-based identification from a four-year specimen cohort collected in a tertiary care hospital.

BIOFIRE FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2检测病原菌的回顾性评价
由机会性酵母菌(即念珠菌属)引起的血液感染(bsi)显示出惊人的高死亡率,需要早期治疗干预以优化患者预后。bsi微生物学诊断的进步引入了快速分子方法,包括多重PCR检测板,直接从血液培养基中检测常见微生物。BIOFIRE FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 (bccid2)检测就是这样一种方法,可以检测7种最常见的导致真菌血症的酵母菌,使临床医生能够更及时地优化治疗方法。在这里,我们评估了bccid2在2021年至2025年间在三级医疗中心阳性血液培养中鉴定酵母的临床性能,并与参考标准方法(将传代培养和诊断质谱结合使用)进行了比较。在我们的研究期间,使用参考方法共确认了252个酵母菌个体鉴定事件,其中33个(13%)代表缺乏bccid2 pcr靶点的生物体,219个(87%)代表该试验靶向的生物体。在219个与bccid2靶蛋白兼容的鉴定中,209个(95%)被正确鉴定。bbcid2与参考方法之间的不一致通常源于bbcid2无法靶向临床血培养中遇到的所有酵母,以及在存在bbb101酵母的培养物中准确性降低。总的来说,这些数据表明,bid2检测是一种快速准确的方法,可以从血培养中识别最常见的引起酵母BSI的微生物;然而,基于传代培养的参考技术是临床微生物学实验室重要的补充工具。侵袭性真菌疾病,包括由酵母菌引起的血液感染(bsi),随着全球免疫功能低下人群的增加,患病率也在增加。及时和有针对性的治疗是有效管理酵母BSI的必要条件,微生物学诊断在定制患者治疗中起着重要作用。同时检测与特定综合征相关的多种病原体的快速分子分析是加快病原体鉴定的有吸引力的策略。这包括BIOFIRE FilmArray血液培养鉴定2 (bid2)试验,可直接从血液培养基中检测33种生物,包括7种通常与真菌血症相关的酵母。它的性能已经很好地建立了检测细菌和细菌耐药标记血培养。在这里,我们对bccid2的微生物学性能提供了一个酵母特异性的快照,强调了它在检测医学上重要的酵母方面的准确性,以及与在三级保健医院收集的四年标本队列中基于标准培养的鉴定相比的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信