Remote monitoring in peritoneal dialysis: an underutilized tool.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Osama El Shamy
{"title":"Remote monitoring in peritoneal dialysis: an underutilized tool.","authors":"Osama El Shamy","doi":"10.1097/MNH.0000000000001127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Remote monitoring in peritoneal dialysis and its practical implementation is an important technology to leverage in optimizing automated peritoneal dialysis delivery. The more advanced our remote monitoring capabilities become, the greater the urgency to implement protocols to appropriately utilize and leverage the technology for the betterment of patient care. Debates about its utility tend to center around two main issues: responsibility and skepticism around the findings of studies that examined its utility, owing to a combination of hyperbolic claims and methodology variations. This review discusses the theory behind remote monitoring, the available data and capabilities, and a path forward towards adopting remote monitoring in peritoneal dialysis.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Numerous clinical studies have demonstrated the association of remote monitoring protocol implementation with reduced hospitalization rates, shorter hospital stays, decreased automated peritoneal dialysis technique failure, and longer time on peritoneal dialysis.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is a need for standardized remote monitoring in peritoneal dialysis protocols. Fewer reported hospitalization rates, shorter hospital stays, and lower automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) technique rates are some of the findings demonstrated in remote monitoring studies. While it is more costly to implement than traditional automated peritoneal dialysis, the reported benefits of remote monitoring outweigh the cost burden. Patients have an overall positive perception and experiences with remote monitoring-APD. Remote patient monitoring provides an additional invaluable resource to enhance the quality of care delivered to.</p>","PeriodicalId":10960,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"80-84"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNH.0000000000001127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Remote monitoring in peritoneal dialysis and its practical implementation is an important technology to leverage in optimizing automated peritoneal dialysis delivery. The more advanced our remote monitoring capabilities become, the greater the urgency to implement protocols to appropriately utilize and leverage the technology for the betterment of patient care. Debates about its utility tend to center around two main issues: responsibility and skepticism around the findings of studies that examined its utility, owing to a combination of hyperbolic claims and methodology variations. This review discusses the theory behind remote monitoring, the available data and capabilities, and a path forward towards adopting remote monitoring in peritoneal dialysis.

Recent findings: Numerous clinical studies have demonstrated the association of remote monitoring protocol implementation with reduced hospitalization rates, shorter hospital stays, decreased automated peritoneal dialysis technique failure, and longer time on peritoneal dialysis.

Summary: There is a need for standardized remote monitoring in peritoneal dialysis protocols. Fewer reported hospitalization rates, shorter hospital stays, and lower automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) technique rates are some of the findings demonstrated in remote monitoring studies. While it is more costly to implement than traditional automated peritoneal dialysis, the reported benefits of remote monitoring outweigh the cost burden. Patients have an overall positive perception and experiences with remote monitoring-APD. Remote patient monitoring provides an additional invaluable resource to enhance the quality of care delivered to.

远程监测腹膜透析:一个未充分利用的工具。
综述目的:腹膜透析远程监测及其实际应用是优化自动腹膜透析输送的重要技术。我们的远程监控能力越先进,实施协议以适当利用和利用技术来改善患者护理的紧迫性就越大。关于其效用的争论往往集中在两个主要问题上:由于双曲声明和方法变化的结合,对检验其效用的研究结果的责任和怀疑。这篇综述讨论了远程监测背后的理论,现有的数据和能力,以及在腹膜透析中采用远程监测的途径。最近的发现:许多临床研究表明,远程监测方案的实施与降低住院率、缩短住院时间、减少自动腹膜透析技术失败和延长腹膜透析时间有关。总结:在腹膜透析方案中需要标准化的远程监测。报告的住院率较低,住院时间较短,自动腹膜透析(APD)技术率较低是远程监测研究的一些发现。虽然实施它比传统的自动腹膜透析成本更高,但据报道,远程监测的好处超过了成本负担。患者对远程监控apd总体上有积极的认知和体验。远程患者监测为提高所提供的护理质量提供了额外的宝贵资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension
Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A reader-friendly resource, Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension provides an up-to-date account of the most important advances in the field of nephrology and hypertension. Each issue contains either two or three sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive coverage of all the key issues, including pathophysiology of hypertension, circulation and hemodynamics, and clinical nephrology. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书