Bertrand Hermann, Guillaume Decormeille, Tiphanie Gobé, Nathanaël Mangeard, Adel Maamar, Saria Sayadi, Bénédicte Pernod, Nadine Robquin, Jean-Pierre Ponthus, Sophie Le Potier, Pierre Bouju, Angélique Balabanian, Antoine Frouin, Sébastien Moschietto, Gwenaelle Jacq, Emeline Villemont, Clémence Houbé, Anaïs Queyreau, Célina Morand, Florence Boissier, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Sabine Valera, Sami Hraiech, Laure Clouet, Gaël Piton, Cindérella Noël, Anne Joosten, Cécilia Tabra Osorio, Adrien Constan, Jérôme Cecchini, Gwennaelle Mercier, Arnaud Bruyneel, Chloé Villamaux, François Pousset, Nicholas Heming, Laurent Poiroux, Jean-François Llitjos, Saber Davide Barbar
{"title":"Neuromuscular blockade and their monitoring in the intensive care unit: a multicenter observational prospective study.","authors":"Bertrand Hermann, Guillaume Decormeille, Tiphanie Gobé, Nathanaël Mangeard, Adel Maamar, Saria Sayadi, Bénédicte Pernod, Nadine Robquin, Jean-Pierre Ponthus, Sophie Le Potier, Pierre Bouju, Angélique Balabanian, Antoine Frouin, Sébastien Moschietto, Gwenaelle Jacq, Emeline Villemont, Clémence Houbé, Anaïs Queyreau, Célina Morand, Florence Boissier, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Sabine Valera, Sami Hraiech, Laure Clouet, Gaël Piton, Cindérella Noël, Anne Joosten, Cécilia Tabra Osorio, Adrien Constan, Jérôme Cecchini, Gwennaelle Mercier, Arnaud Bruyneel, Chloé Villamaux, François Pousset, Nicholas Heming, Laurent Poiroux, Jean-François Llitjos, Saber Davide Barbar","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01591-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuromuscular blocking agents may improve outcomes in specific conditions, including the early phase of acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, neuromuscular blocking agents are associated with side effects and uncertainty persists regarding their optimal dosing and efficacy. Our objective was to describe the use of neuromuscular blocking agents in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, prospective observational study, including adult patients who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation and received a continuous infusion of neuromuscular blocking agents. Patients were recruited across 19 intensive care units in France and Belgium.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 16, 2019, to February 19, 2020, a total of 2248 patients were hospitalized and mechanically ventilated in 19 participating ICUs. Of these, 270 (12%) patients received at least one dose of neuromuscular blocking agents, and 232 (10.3%) received a continuous infusion. The main indications for neuromuscular blocking agents use were acute respiratory distress syndrome (61%), prevention of shivering during therapeutic hypothermia (16%) and patient-ventilator asynchrony (12%). Infusion was initiated in median at 0 [0-2] days after ICU admission, with a median duration of 38 [22-71] hours. Cisatracurium was the preferred agent (74%). Neuromuscular blocking agents monitoring by train-of-four was employed in 48% of patients. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness was diagnosed in 25% of patients, pressure ulcers in 14% and ventilator-associated pneumonia in 26%. The median lengths of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay were 9 [4-16] and 13 [6-22] days, and ICU mortality was 41%. In multivariable analyses, a duration of neuromuscular blocking agents infusion exceeding 48 hours was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of weaning success (SHR 0.83 [0.76, 0.91], p < 0.001) and higher incidences of ventilator-associated pneumonia, while neuromuscular blocking agents monitoring was associated with both increased intensive care unit-acquired weakness (OR 2.90 [1.2, 7.01], p = 0.018) and reduced ICU mortality (HR 0.55 [95%CI 0.32, 0.95], p = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, the prevalence of continuous neuromuscular blocking agents infusion among mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit was 10.3%. While acute respiratory distress syndrome was the main indication, over one-third of patients received neuromuscular blocking agents for other reasons. A duration of neuromuscular blocking agents infusion exceeding 48 hours was associated with longer mechanical ventilation and increased complications. The role of neuromuscular blocking agents monitoring remains unclear. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04028362 Registered on 18 July 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04028362 . The study was conducted by the French Intensive Care Society/Société de Réanimation de Langue Française Trial Group.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"167"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01591-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Neuromuscular blocking agents may improve outcomes in specific conditions, including the early phase of acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, neuromuscular blocking agents are associated with side effects and uncertainty persists regarding their optimal dosing and efficacy. Our objective was to describe the use of neuromuscular blocking agents in a real-world setting.
Methods: We conducted a multicenter, prospective observational study, including adult patients who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation and received a continuous infusion of neuromuscular blocking agents. Patients were recruited across 19 intensive care units in France and Belgium.
Results: From November 16, 2019, to February 19, 2020, a total of 2248 patients were hospitalized and mechanically ventilated in 19 participating ICUs. Of these, 270 (12%) patients received at least one dose of neuromuscular blocking agents, and 232 (10.3%) received a continuous infusion. The main indications for neuromuscular blocking agents use were acute respiratory distress syndrome (61%), prevention of shivering during therapeutic hypothermia (16%) and patient-ventilator asynchrony (12%). Infusion was initiated in median at 0 [0-2] days after ICU admission, with a median duration of 38 [22-71] hours. Cisatracurium was the preferred agent (74%). Neuromuscular blocking agents monitoring by train-of-four was employed in 48% of patients. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness was diagnosed in 25% of patients, pressure ulcers in 14% and ventilator-associated pneumonia in 26%. The median lengths of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay were 9 [4-16] and 13 [6-22] days, and ICU mortality was 41%. In multivariable analyses, a duration of neuromuscular blocking agents infusion exceeding 48 hours was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of weaning success (SHR 0.83 [0.76, 0.91], p < 0.001) and higher incidences of ventilator-associated pneumonia, while neuromuscular blocking agents monitoring was associated with both increased intensive care unit-acquired weakness (OR 2.90 [1.2, 7.01], p = 0.018) and reduced ICU mortality (HR 0.55 [95%CI 0.32, 0.95], p = 0.032).
Conclusion: In our study, the prevalence of continuous neuromuscular blocking agents infusion among mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit was 10.3%. While acute respiratory distress syndrome was the main indication, over one-third of patients received neuromuscular blocking agents for other reasons. A duration of neuromuscular blocking agents infusion exceeding 48 hours was associated with longer mechanical ventilation and increased complications. The role of neuromuscular blocking agents monitoring remains unclear. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04028362 Registered on 18 July 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04028362 . The study was conducted by the French Intensive Care Society/Société de Réanimation de Langue Française Trial Group.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.